|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
AP Breaking News: Prosecutors close Armstrong inquiry, no charges
On Feb 7, 3:06*pm, Fred Flintstein
wrote: On 2/7/2012 3:10 PM, BLafferty wrote: It's not over. Dumbass, True. Some gifts never stop giving. Now we'll have to wait for Jeff Novitsky to figure out what details of the investigation he can print in his book without breaching any grand jury secrecy. I can't wait to find out, and neither should you! Sincerely, Jeff Novitsky |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
AP Breaking News: Prosecutors close Armstrong inquiry, no charges
Fred Flintstein wrote:
I'm getting the urge to make a chart out of that. I'll just lay down until the feeling goes away. Wanting to make a chart is to rbr what getting laid is to everyone else. Just take a cold shower and you'll feel much better. If that doesn't work try imagining Newt Gingrich having sex with Rosie O'Donnell and Susan Boyle. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
AP Breaking News: Prosecutors close Armstrong inquiry, no charges
Frederick the Great wrote:
When you find you are riding a dead horse, dismount. I think he prefers flogging it. Anyway i doubt whether necrophilia with a beast of burden is a crime in most US states. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
AP Breaking News: Prosecutors close Armstrong inquiry, no charges
BLafferty wrote:
We did get an indictment and a guilty plea there of Polgar's webmaster, Gregory Alexander. He is awaiting sentencing on March 22. His allocution will be interesting. Stay tuned. William Fred wrote: At last it's safe to play chess again! Until Kasparov's flying penis returns. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
AP Breaking News: Prosecutors close Armstrong inquiry, no charges
On 2/8/2012 1:42 AM, Fredmaster of Brainerd wrote:
On Feb 7, 3:06 pm, Fred wrote: On 2/7/2012 3:10 PM, BLafferty wrote: It's not over. Dumbass, True. Some gifts never stop giving. Now we'll have to wait for Jeff Novitsky to figure out what details of the investigation he can print in his book without breaching any grand jury secrecy. I can't wait to find out, and neither should you! Sincerely, Jeff Novitsky When he publishes it in English it'll all she wrote for LANCE. F |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
AP Breaking News: Prosecutors close Armstrong inquiry, no charges
On 2/7/2012 10:38 PM, Rick Hopkins wrote:
On Feb 7, 1:10 pm, wrote: On Feb 7, 11:05 am, "William R. wrote: On 2/4/2012 7:46 AM, tritonrider wrote: Let's face it he's easily the most tested/investigated athlete in history and comes out, if not clean at least reasonably so in comparison. Now if Brian would just agree with this then we could all move ong Bill -- William R. Mattil http://www.celestial-images.com Well, it now appears that something odd went on. The investigators think there was a strong criminal case. The US Attorney has discretion to diagree, but the manner in which the USA acted on short notice with no apparent consultation with his investigators, smell to high heaven. It's not over.http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/conc...f-federal-inve... Why am I reminded of Lucy holding the football for Charlie Brown. If it helps you get through the day Brian, believe whatever..... Hey let me hold the football and I promise not to pull out this time, really...... But I always hated Lucy, while in this case... |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
AP Breaking News: Prosecutors close Armstrong inquiry, no charges
On Feb 4, 9:33*am, Brad Anders wrote:
On Feb 3, 8:11*pm, tritonrider wrote: On Feb 3, 9:40*pm, Jimmy July wrote: On 2/3/2012 6:17 PM, William R. Mattil wrote: Hope LAFF doesn't go off the deep end with this announcement....... When has Laff ever been out of the deep end? Believe it or not Brian is one of the most rational, objective, and reasonable people I know with the exception of one or two minor issues related to *doping in sports. What about chess? Transcript of Alexander's plea hearing is available he http://www.krinternetlaw.com/internet-l ... y-Plea.pdf Q. Mr. Alexander, do you understand that, as we've just talked about, once you enter a guilty plea, a presentence report would be prepared, and the sentencing judge, in this case, probably Magistrate Judge Laporte, will have to review that, and you will have a chance to comment or object to the report before any sentencing. Do you understand that? A. Yes, your Honor. Q. And you understand that although the sentencing judgewill consider the recommendation, it's not bound by the recommendation that is in this plea agreement, that she could impose a sentence that is different than that which is recommended here? A. Yes, your Honor. Q. And that even if she imposes a sentence that's more severe than is recommended, you would not have a right to withdraw your plea once you enter it. Do you understand that? A. I understand. Q. All right. And you've discussed with your attorney how the sentencing guidelines operate here? A. Yes, your Honor. Q. And you understand that the United States Supreme Court has ruled that the guideline ranges, once they're calculated, is advisory only and not binding on the Court? A. Yes. Q. And that you will have a chance to, as I I mentioned, to address any calculation that you disagree with at the sentencing hearing. Do you understand that? A. Can you repeat the last sentence? Q. That at the sentencing hearing, if for some reason you disagree with the judge's calculation, you have a chance to comment on that? A. Yes, your Honor. Q. And you understand that parole in the federal system has been abolished, and if you are sentenced to prison, you will not be released on parole. Do you understand that? A. Yes, your Honor.................... Q.And that during the time you repeatedly accessed his personal e-mail account, Hough was a member of the U.S. Chess Federation board of directors. By gaining access to his e-mail account you were able to obtain confidential information related to the United States Chess Federation internal investigation; that you forwarded some of that information to other individuals who were associated with the United States Chess Federation. Is that true? A. Yes, your Honor. I anticipate that the USCF and a number of former Polgar defendants, including myself, will ask the court to to require Alexander to name ALL of the above referenced individuals. Failing to do that, the court will be asked to sentence Alexander to a term in prison not exceeding one year for failure to properly and fully accept responsibility for his criminal act(s) as set forth in his plea agreement. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
AP Breaking News: Prosecutors close Armstrong inquiry, no charges
On Feb 5, 10:13*am, tritonrider wrote:
On Feb 5, 12:10*am, BLafferty wrote: On Feb 4, 10:16*pm, tritonrider wrote: On Feb 4, 8:59*pm, Phil H wrote: On Feb 3, 8:11*pm, tritonrider wrote: On Feb 3, 9:40*pm, Jimmy July wrote: On 2/3/2012 6:17 PM, William R. Mattil wrote: Hope LAFF doesn't go off the deep end with this announcement........ When has Laff ever been out of the deep end? Believe it or not Brian is one of the most rational, objective, and reasonable people I know with the exception of one or two minor issues related to *doping in sports. *Good friend, great guy *Bill C How very odd, *what you describe is the antithesis of the BL in rbr. Phil H *Rbr is a sideshow and Brian understands that pretty well. He's also a lawyer and they like to argue and win, at least in general. He may also be half as hard headed as I am, and that's saying something. I'm not telling anyone anything new when I point out that Brian is (My word here) fanatically dedicated to a fair and level playing field for everyone. People will use that kind of dedication to yank your chain, anything is grounds for chain yanking around here anyway. It gets messier from there and what you see now here is what you get from years and years of back and forth in rbr. *I respect where He's coming from and his dedication, and amazingly enough if He's treated with basic respect he returns it even when you disagree, and, lord knows, Brian and I don't agree on a whole lot but I can't think of a single angry word between us. *He does understand "Reasonable people can have reasonable differences" and that we don't all place the same value, or priority, on the same things in life and is incredibly good at respecting others positions if they respect his. *Bill C Thanks again,Bill. (snipped) It's decline is sad, but the electronic world has changed a lot since 1993 when I first posted to rbr. It is what it is today. Rather mean spirited and ad homenium. Ride on....... No problem. Haven't even done much lurking here in a while and really thought hard about joining into this but wanted to at least comment on what's become the myth and legend of "Laff atMe" on rbr. There's always a bit of truth at the bottom of folklore, and I think you still exist, but you've been used to create a new chunk of social myth and legend. For someone interested in that stuff it's been fun to watch, mostly from the sidelines. *What's been really strange is watching "Gummer" conduct reasonable human interactions on quite a few boards I read. Leaves me wondering just how much he was playing a character here too. *Interesting take hehttp://news.yahoo.com/90-days-withou...social-media-0... *Still some great people here. One of the reasons I do come back is to just really enjoy D-y's stuff. It's always great to be able to get a reminder that people like him are still out there. *Best to everyone Bill C *Not my place to speak for you, or even about you really, but as we all know watching a friend trashed unfairly is one of my buttons. Sheesh. I don't know if you're talking with tongue in cheek or simply trying to be BL's PR flack in full-on damage control mode. Nobody used BL's words to make him look like an obsessive idiot. He did it all by his lonesome. People used his words to ridicule his On Any Tuesday & I Don't Need No Steenking Presumed Innocent campaign platforms. Witness his recent diatribe summation post "proving" LANCE's guilt. See? He's been right all along and he shall rise up again and woe to the wicked! Sancho! My horse! Stop enabling a destructive obsession and schedule an intervention. It's what a good friend would do. R |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
AP Breaking News: Prosecutors close Armstrong inquiry, no charges
BLafferty wrote:
Transcript of Alexander's plea hearing is available he http://www.krinternetlaw.com/internet-l ... y-Plea.pdf Q. Mr. Alexander, do you understand that, as we've just talked about, once you enter a guilty plea, a presentence report would be prepared, and the sentencing I anticipate that the USCF and a number of former Polgar defendants, including myself, will ask the court to to require Alexander to name ALL of the above referenced individuals. You should ask him whether he ever operated a mechanical flying penis during a political speech. A subpenis should help Kasparov get to the bottom of the matter. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WSJ: Prosecutors Step Up Armstrong Probe | bar | Racing | 104 | August 2nd 10 05:08 AM |
ARMSTRONG -- He Of Dubious Cancer Recovery And Sworn Non-SteroidsUser -- Takes A SHOWER, But Ducks DRUG INQUIRY! | MissSouth | Racing | 9 | April 12th 09 03:24 PM |
ARMSTRONG -- He Of Dubious Cancer Recovery And Sworn Non-SteroidsUser -- Takes A SHOWER, But Ducks DRUG INQUIRY! | MissSouth | General | 4 | April 11th 09 10:00 PM |
Armstrong cleared in EPO inquiry | Mark Thompson | UK | 4 | June 1st 06 06:15 PM |
Breaking news on ITV | Tony Raven | UK | 3 | January 8th 06 01:34 PM |