#11
|
|||
|
|||
URCM?
On 31/12/2009 19:07, Nigel Cliffe wrote:
Marc wrote: On 31/12/2009 18:09, Tosspot wrote: Marc wrote: On 31/12/2009 17:58, Tosspot wrote: Marc wrote: Broke? Or am I just being stood on the naughty step again? Was ok a while ago. Leave it for a bit, have a beer or two, it'll be fine. A bit? I posted something over 6 hrs ago... You might be right. Seems quiet since this morning. Right, beer time. All further posts from me should be ignored! Forever? Moderation queue empty when I just checked at 19.06. Posting from you timed at 18.13 in the group, which suggests a moderator got back around then. Kindly ****-off from discussing URCM issues here. If your group can't handle it, then tough - here is not the place to discuss your group's short-comings, you hypocritical ******! Thanks, Happi |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
URCM?
Happi Monday wrote:
snip Kindly ****-off from discussing URCM issues here. If your group can't handle it, then tough - here is not the place to discuss your group's short-comings, you hypocritical ******! Thanks, Happi Oooh look, URCs new moderator, telling people what they can and can't post. Why don't you just ****off back to mummy you flacid little cocksucking prick. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
URCM?
On 01/01/2010 12:48, Tosspot wrote:
Happi Monday wrote: snip Kindly ****-off from discussing URCM issues here. If your group can't handle it, then tough - here is not the place to discuss your group's short-comings, you hypocritical ******! Thanks, Happi Oooh look, URCs new moderator, telling people what they can and can't post. Why don't you just ****off back to mummy you flacid little cocksucking prick. Although hypocritical in the extreme, I can accept URCM mods. posting here on cycling matters. However, I do object to them posting here due to the shortcomings of their own little ******s' club. HTH, Happi PS. You have a very apt nick. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
URCM?
Tosspot wrote:
Happi Monday wrote: snip Kindly ***-off from discussing URCM issues here. If your group can't handle it, then tough - here is not the place to discuss your group's short-comings, you hypocritical w*****! Thanks, Happi Oooh look, URCs new moderator, telling people what they can and can't post. Why don't you just f***off back to mummy you flacid little c***sucking p****. Happy New Year! plonk -- www.slowbicyclemovement.org - enjoy the ride |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
URCM?
On 01/01/2010 17:54, Jim A wrote:
Tosspot wrote: Happi Monday wrote: snip Kindly ***-off from discussing URCM issues here. If your group can't handle it, then tough - here is not the place to discuss your group's short-comings, you hypocritical w*****! Thanks, Happi Oooh look, URCs new moderator, telling people what they can and can't post. Why don't you just f***off back to mummy you flacid little c***sucking p****. Happy New Year! plonk It took you this long? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
URCM?
On 1 Jan, 12:48, Tosspot wrote:
*Why don't you just ****off back to mummy you flaccid little cocksucking prick. Is that even possible? :-/ |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
URCM?
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 10:00:20 -0800 (PST), "
wrote: On 1 Jan, 12:48, Tosspot wrote: *Why don't you just ****off back to mummy you flaccid little cocksucking prick. Is that even possible? :-/ I have heard that about 5% of men can bend their head as far as their penis. What I do not know is how many can do this while their penis is flaccid. However, having seen some Chinese contortionists walking about with their head between their legs, I have no doubt that some people can. Even more exceptional, I expect there are those who can kiss their own arse. This picture illustrates my point while remaining decent. http://www.leyogi.com/leyogi/images/galeries/14.JPG |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
URCM?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
URCM?
Tosspot wrote in
: wrote: On 1 Jan, 12:48, Tosspot wrote: Why don't you just ****off back to mummy you flaccid little cocksucking prick. Is that even possible? :-/ I've no idea, I had a hangover of biblical proportions and thought I'd give happi some of the **** he's been dishing out back and see how he responded. I reckon if more people treated trolls like that this place would be a bit better. It was indicative his was probably the most relevant post there was Still, normal service resumed Why are you using a European Space Agency email address )? Do you work for them? If you do work for the ESA, you should learn to tame your language as I'm sure your employer would not condone such behaviour. If you don't work for the ESA, you are deliberately misusing their domain name and possibly the actual email address of a real ESA employee. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
URCM?
Mr. Benn wrote:
Tosspot wrote in : wrote: On 1 Jan, 12:48, Tosspot wrote: Why don't you just ****off back to mummy you flaccid little cocksucking prick. Is that even possible? :-/ I've no idea, I had a hangover of biblical proportions and thought I'd give happi some of the **** he's been dishing out back and see how he responded. I reckon if more people treated trolls like that this place would be a bit better. It was indicative his was probably the most relevant post there was Still, normal service resumed Why are you using a European Space Agency email address )? Do you work for them? No, but they see fit to give me an email address. If you do work for the ESA, you should learn to tame your language as I'm sure your employer would not condone such behaviour. If you don't work for the ESA, you are deliberately misusing their domain name and possibly the actual email address of a real ESA employee. Well, given my employer has not told me to moderate my language when I've used similar terms of endearment at him in meetings, I can't say he will be very bothered. I use the work email address as because it has a very good spam filter. I suppose I could use gmail or similar as these days spam filters are pretty good the world over, but I never got around to it. Tbf, people from this NG have contacted me on it in the past, but only for more civilised conversation or a bit of underground railway work. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
URCM | Marc[_2_] | UK | 29 | December 16th 09 08:39 PM |
Missing Messages from URCM | Judith M Smith | UK | 80 | December 11th 09 08:58 AM |
urcm It is using urc to do its own job | Trevor A Panther | UK | 20 | November 13th 09 06:49 PM |
Post rejection on urcm | Adam Funk[_5_] | UK | 0 | October 25th 09 06:23 PM |
Re Proposed URCM | jms | UK | 9 | May 29th 09 04:12 PM |