|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
"S Curtiss" wrote in message newsdCog.26013$FR1.25358@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... "S Curtiss" wrote in message news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave. com... [...] ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their idiotic messages. Hello Dolan, the great idiot Thus proving my point! To who...? I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know? Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk. Thus proving my point! You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and jerk. We've known that for quite some time. The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is being Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet, he does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because he is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like Saint Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because he is a man of the groin preoccupied with ****, **** and sex and not a man of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great. "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as interesting as myself. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
"Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as interesting as myself. pathetic |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
"S Curtiss" wrote in message newsNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message newsNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message newsNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman. He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots, jerks and assholes. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
A troll sets up camp in a newsgroup where he's got nothing to offer and
stirs up crap. Then he responds to any answers to create interminably long threads filled with interminably long messages since he never snips. These strings of nonsense help boost his sense of power and consequently his shriveled sense of self esteem. Typical of cubicle dwellers who've been shunted off to a deadend to await retirement. The only order of perpetual sorrow is populated by those exposed to his drivel. Oh well, it's an open usenet. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
Edward Dolan wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message newsNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman. He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots, jerks and assholes. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
Edward Dolan wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message newsNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman. He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots, jerks and assholes. Intellect is a required given necessary for constructing verbiage. What don't you understand about this basic concept ... dullard. - Jim McNamara. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message newsNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
"Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Really...? Then I would suggest you drop it. After all, you spread the Vandy topic into other realms of rec/alt bicycles. You have continued the topic with silly accusations and your own attempts to draw attention away from your cross-posting disaster. You are merely extending the topic so you can continue to claim it is someone else's fault. If you want to post on point concerning the opinions of MV, have at it. Otherwise, this thread is dead. The same "argument" in several spots. Beyond meaningless. Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as that best describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st edward the sorrowfully miniscule. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. [...] I don't have any monopoly money. This thread is dead. The same "argument" in several spots. Beyond meaningless. Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as that best describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st edward the sorrowfully miniscule. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 75 | July 8th 06 04:24 AM |
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups | Edward Dolan | Recumbent Biking | 78 | July 8th 06 04:24 AM |
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups | Edward Dolan | General | 0 | June 28th 06 07:26 AM |
Hey Dolan I hope Vandeman doesn't stop suddenly | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 0 | June 10th 06 07:57 AM |
An experiment to prove the helmet law proponants RIGHT (or wrong) | David | Recumbent Biking | 65 | December 21st 04 06:42 AM |