Question for Tom "Fearless Fosdick" Sherman

On Aug 19, 8:20 pm, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman"
wrote:
RonSonic wrote:

Could it possibly be more obvious that I am not and never have used the "Google
Usenet interface."

That would require viewing of current and past headers.


Is your life that empty? Are you such a clueless wacko, such a lameass
loser that you spend your time "viewing current and past headers" of
posts to a Usenet group?

Sad..........

Ozark Bicycle - 100% Service and 0% "Attitude [1]" - wrote:
On Aug 19, 8:20 pm, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman"
wrote:
RonSonic wrote:

Could it possibly be more obvious that I am not and never have used the "Google
Usenet interface."
That would require viewing of current and past headers.


Is your life that empty? Are you such a clueless wacko, such a lameass
loser that you spend your time "viewing current and past headers" of
posts to a Usenet group?

Sad..........

No Zarkie, just a statement of fact that it is generally not possible to
tell where a Usenet post comes from without looking at the header.

[1] That's saved for Usenet.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
“Twisting may help if yawl can chew gum and walk.” - gene daniels

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Aug 20, 5:24 pm, "Tom "Oldest male virgin on Usenet" Sherman"
wrote:
Ozark Bicycle - 100% Service and 0% "Attitude [1]" - wrote:

On Aug 19, 8:20 pm, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman"
wrote:
RonSonic wrote:

Could it possibly be more obvious that I am not and never have used the "Google
Usenet interface."
That would require viewing of current and past headers.

Is your life that empty? Are you such a clueless wacko, such a lameass
loser that you spend your time "viewing current and past headers" of
posts to a Usenet group?

Sad..........

No Zarkie, just a statement of fact that it is generally not possible to
tell where a Usenet post comes from without looking at the header.


Just think, Tommy, maybe one day you'll actually get laid; then, you
can worry about how long it will take you to get it up again, instead
of worrying about "where a Usenet post comes from".

Ozark Bicycle wrote:
On Aug 20, 5:24 pm, "Tom "Oldest male virgin on Usenet" Sherman"
wrote:
Ozark Bicycle - 100% Service and 0% "Attitude [1]" - wrote:

On Aug 19, 8:20 pm, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman"
wrote:
RonSonic wrote:
Could it possibly be more obvious that I am not and never have used the "Google
Usenet interface."
That would require viewing of current and past headers.
Is your life that empty? Are you such a clueless wacko, such a lameass
loser that you spend your time "viewing current and past headers" of
posts to a Usenet group?
Sad..........
No Zarkie, just a statement of fact that it is generally not possible to
tell where a Usenet post comes from without looking at the header.


Just think, Tommy, maybe one day you'll actually get laid; then, you
can worry about how long it will take you to get it up again, instead
of worrying about "where a Usenet post comes from".

[Yawn]

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:56:45 -0700, Ozark Bicycle
wrote:

Just think, Tommy, maybe one day you'll actually get laid; then, you
can worry about how long it will take you to get it up again,

At his age, no doubt *very much faster* than you.

instead
of worrying about "where a Usenet post comes from".

That can be seen with one key-stroke on most newsreaders.