#21
|
|||
|
|||
Andre Jute FAQ
In article ,
RonSonic wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2009 08:28:04 -0400, Still Just Me wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:16:31 -0700, jim beam wrote: er, i'm not lazy at all - you're just too dim to understand. I understand just fine. There's a very a limited number of reasons someone would consistently not use the shift key: 1. Too lazy 2. Too stupid Take your pick. 3. Indifference to legibility and convenience of readers. 4. Affectation 5. e.e. cummings E.E. Cummings capitalized proper names (except his own). -- Michael Press |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Andre Jute FAQ
In article ,
Tom_Sherman wrote: RonSonic aka Ron Bales wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2009 08:28:04 -0400, Still Just Me wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:16:31 -0700, jim beam wrote: er, i'm not lazy at all - you're just too dim to understand. I understand just fine. There's a very a limited number of reasons someone would consistently not use the shift key: 1. Too lazy 2. Too stupid Take your pick. 3. Indifference to legibility and convenience of readers. 4. Affectation 5. e.e. cummings No. 5 is more applicable to gene daniels than "jim beam". No. E.E. Cummings capitalized proper names, whereas Gene Daniels does not. -- Michael Press |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Andre Jute FAQ
On May 22, 1:42*pm, jim beam wrote:
RonSonic wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2009 08:28:04 -0400, Still Just Me wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:16:31 -0700, jim beam wrote: er, i'm not lazy at all - you're just too dim to understand. I understand just fine. There's a very a limited number of reasons someone would consistently not use the shift key: 1. Too lazy 2. Too stupid Take your pick. 3. Indifference to legibility and convenience of readers. 4. Affectation 5. e.e. cummings 6. c.l.i. capability So you're usenetting from an Apple ][+ that has no shift key? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Andre Jute FAQ
Hank Wirtz wrote:
On May 22, 1:42�pm, jim beam wrote: RonSonic wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2009 08:28:04 -0400, Still Just Me wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:16:31 -0700, jim beam wrote: er, i'm not lazy at all - you're just too dim to understand. I understand just fine. There's a very a limited number of reasons someone would consistently not use the shift key: 1. Too lazy 2. Too stupid Take your pick. 3. Indifference to legibility and convenience of readers. 4. Affectation 5. e.e. cummings 6. c.l.i. capability So you're usenetting from an Apple ][+ that has no shift key? yes. no. oh well, i should probably confess - it's called "retard baiting". sick, i know, but i just love it when they can't help themselves. go ahead and report me to the s.p.c.a. - it's cruel to bait dumb animals. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Andre Jute FAQ
Still Just Me wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009 06:21:48 -0700, jim beam wrote: Still Just Me wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:16:31 -0700, jim beam wrote: er, i'm not lazy at all - you're just too dim to understand. I understand just fine. There's a very a limited number of reasons someone would consistently not use the shift key: 1. Too lazy 2. Too stupid Take your pick. er, no. it's been explained, by others, not just me. but apparently you're either too stupid or too dishonest to go there. Please explain clearly why you can't use a shift key other than laziness or stupidity. Unless the excuse includes loss of one arm due to an accident involving a rotating camshaft you did not expect to find in a two cycle diesel, it doesn't count. now you stand by your word and go ahead and send me your money - i'll show you what i do with it. Post your address and I will renew the call for the keyboard collection and forward it to you. We can't send money to an anonymous poster. hey, dip****, have you any clue what happens to big, dumb, slow moving fish when they're too busy chowing chum to notice a gaffe being lowered into the water? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Andre Jute FAQ
Still Just Me wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009 14:56:20 -0700, jim beam wrote: Still Just Me wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2009 06:21:48 -0700, jim beam wrote: Still Just Me wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:16:31 -0700, jim beam wrote: er, i'm not lazy at all - you're just too dim to understand. I understand just fine. There's a very a limited number of reasons someone would consistently not use the shift key: 1. Too lazy 2. Too stupid Take your pick. er, no. it's been explained, by others, not just me. but apparently you're either too stupid or too dishonest to go there. Please explain clearly why you can't use a shift key other than laziness or stupidity. Unless the excuse includes loss of one arm due to an accident involving a rotating camshaft you did not expect to find in a two cycle diesel, it doesn't count. now you stand by your word and go ahead and send me your money - i'll show you what i do with it. Post your address and I will renew the call for the keyboard collection and forward it to you. We can't send money to an anonymous poster. hey, dip****, have you any clue what happens to big, dumb, slow moving fish when they're too busy chowing chum to notice a gaffe being lowered into the water? Sorry, but this thread has been settled. in your tiny mind? not much room for honesty in that microscopic space, is there!!! You are obviously both lazy and stupid. whatever you say dude! integrity is your watchword! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Andre Jute FAQ
Still Just Me wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009 14:56:20 -0700, jim beam wrote: Still Just Me wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2009 06:21:48 -0700, jim beam wrote: Still Just Me wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:16:31 -0700, jim beam wrote: er, i'm not lazy at all - you're just too dim to understand. I understand just fine. There's a very a limited number of reasons someone would consistently not use the shift key: 1. Too lazy 2. Too stupid Take your pick. er, no. it's been explained, by others, not just me. but apparently you're either too stupid or too dishonest to go there. Please explain clearly why you can't use a shift key other than laziness or stupidity. Unless the excuse includes loss of one arm due to an accident involving a rotating camshaft you did not expect to find in a two cycle diesel, it doesn't count. now you stand by your word and go ahead and send me your money - i'll show you what i do with it. Post your address and I will renew the call for the keyboard collection and forward it to you. We can't send money to an anonymous poster. hey, dip****, have you any clue what happens to big, dumb, slow moving fish when they're too busy chowing chum to notice a gaffe being lowered into the water? Sorry, but this thread has been settled. not very honest with yourself are you! You are obviously both lazy and stupid. whatever you say dude! we can trust your word based on your proven integrity! |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Andre Jute FAQ
Still Just Me wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:43:15 -0700, jim beam a lazy and stupid poster wrote: Still Just Me wrote: On Sat, 23 May 2009 14:56:20 -0700, jim beam wrote: Still Just Me wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2009 06:21:48 -0700, jim beam wrote: Still Just Me wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:16:31 -0700, jim beam wrote: er, i'm not lazy at all - you're just too dim to understand. I understand just fine. There's a very a limited number of reasons someone would consistently not use the shift key: 1. Too lazy 2. Too stupid Take your pick. er, no. it's been explained, by others, not just me. but apparently you're either too stupid or too dishonest to go there. Please explain clearly why you can't use a shift key other than laziness or stupidity. Unless the excuse includes loss of one arm due to an accident involving a rotating camshaft you did not expect to find in a two cycle diesel, it doesn't count. now you stand by your word and go ahead and send me your money - i'll show you what i do with it. Post your address and I will renew the call for the keyboard collection and forward it to you. We can't send money to an anonymous poster. hey, dip****, have you any clue what happens to big, dumb, slow moving fish when they're too busy chowing chum to notice a gaffe being lowered into the water? Sorry, but this thread has been settled. not very honest with yourself are you! You are obviously both lazy and stupid. whatever you say dude! we can trust your word based on your proven integrity! Pardon me You're questioning my integrity? yes. or i'm pointing out that you're delusional. It's uncompromised - although I can't see how pointing out your self admitted laziness and stupidity is related in any way. people who resort to suggestio falsi have uncompromised integrity? dude, you have a problem. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
McCoy (Jute) and the (putative) forgeries | _[_2_] | Techniques | 0 | April 24th 09 04:11 PM |
NEWSFLASH: Andre Jute is actually Donald Crowhurst | D'ohBoy | Techniques | 0 | April 24th 09 01:17 PM |
Jute on Bicycles welcomes you to new home | Andre Jute[_2_] | Techniques | 0 | February 7th 09 05:40 PM |
Jute of the Yukon | Peter Howard | Techniques | 1 | January 18th 09 05:17 AM |