#1
|
|||
|
|||
No Fat Trucks
The subconscious mind, once sold on the idea that bigger things are
better, will often override our best intentions. We, in turn, find ourselves along for the ride, and as the things around us grow bigger, so do we. Check out this article http://www.NoFatTrucks.com/suvfat07.htm site of my dreams! |
Ads |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
No Fat Trucks
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
No Fat Trucks
"Chalo" wrote in message om... (Joe Pig) wrote: The subconscious mind, once sold on the idea that bigger things are better, will often override our best intentions. We, in turn, find ourselves along for the ride, and as the things around us grow bigger, so do we. Check out this article http://www.NoFatTrucks.com/suvfat07.htm site of my dreams! There is a name for the mindset that says, "smaller is better". That name is stinginess. If you were a big person trying to find a comfortable fit in a stingy world, sizeist crap like that you are shoveling would just be more of a dreadfully familiar irritant. I grew too big for most cars (6'7") before I was allowed to drive one. Now at 6'8" and about 400 lbs., I am constantly presented with "one size" public accomodations that are not, in fact, accomodations to me. 400 pounds? So you eat 4000 calories a day, right? You're 6 inches shorter than Shaquille O'Neal, and weigh 80 pounds more? Sure..... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
No Fat Trucks
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:26:22 GMT, "Gooserider" wrote:
"Chalo" wrote in message . com... (Joe Pig) wrote: The subconscious mind, once sold on the idea that bigger things are better, will often override our best intentions. We, in turn, find ourselves along for the ride, and as the things around us grow bigger, so do we. Check out this article http://www.NoFatTrucks.com/suvfat07.htm site of my dreams! There is a name for the mindset that says, "smaller is better". That name is stinginess. If you were a big person trying to find a comfortable fit in a stingy world, sizeist crap like that you are shoveling would just be more of a dreadfully familiar irritant. I grew too big for most cars (6'7") before I was allowed to drive one. Now at 6'8" and about 400 lbs., I am constantly presented with "one size" public accomodations that are not, in fact, accomodations to me. 400 pounds? So you eat 4000 calories a day, right? You're 6 inches shorter than Shaquille O'Neal, and weigh 80 pounds more? Sure..... Dude, Imagine the kind of BIKE he rides! It's gotta be the Hummer of bicycles, eh? lol http://www.recordholders.org/en/records/didi.html -B |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
No Fat Trucks
In article ,
says... On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:26:22 GMT, "Gooserider" wrote: "Chalo" wrote in message . com... (Joe Pig) wrote: The subconscious mind, once sold on the idea that bigger things are better, will often override our best intentions. We, in turn, find ourselves along for the ride, and as the things around us grow bigger, so do we. Check out this article http://www.NoFatTrucks.com/suvfat07.htm site of my dreams! There is a name for the mindset that says, "smaller is better". That name is stinginess. If you were a big person trying to find a comfortable fit in a stingy world, sizeist crap like that you are shoveling would just be more of a dreadfully familiar irritant. I grew too big for most cars (6'7") before I was allowed to drive one. Now at 6'8" and about 400 lbs., I am constantly presented with "one size" public accomodations that are not, in fact, accomodations to me. 400 pounds? So you eat 4000 calories a day, right? You're 6 inches shorter than Shaquille O'Neal, and weigh 80 pounds more? Sure..... Dude, Imagine the kind of BIKE he rides! It's gotta be the Hummer of bicycles, eh? lol Did you see the custom frame that Cannondale made for Shaq in the current issue of Bicycling mag? They didn't give the size (at least I didn't see it), but when they put one of the three copies of the frame through their destructive test routine, they couldn't break it; the machine was at its max output, and still couldn't break the frame. -- Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the newsgroups if possible). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
No Fat Trucks
"vic" wrote
The latest stats I could find say that 99% of US adult males lie in the height range 5' 2" - 6' 3". You are way up the top end of the curve for height (along with about 1 in 10,000 of the population) , so it's not surprising that you have had a hard time fitting in cars designed for the majority. It's poor economcs for general automotive manufacturers to design their vehicles to accomodate the very top and tail of the height curve: The middling majority would be forced to pay for the extra metal and glass (plus the associated vehicle mass and wind resistance), while gaining no real benefit from the increased size. All I can say is that I'm grateful for claustrophobics. Peter (6'10") Cole |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
No Fat Trucks
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:20:00 -0500, Badger_South
wrote: On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:26:22 GMT, "Gooserider" wrote: "Chalo" wrote in message .com... (Joe Pig) wrote: The subconscious mind, once sold on the idea that bigger things are better, will often override our best intentions. We, in turn, find ourselves along for the ride, and as the things around us grow bigger, so do we. Check out this article http://www.NoFatTrucks.com/suvfat07.htm site of my dreams! There is a name for the mindset that says, "smaller is better". That name is stinginess. If you were a big person trying to find a comfortable fit in a stingy world, sizeist crap like that you are shoveling would just be more of a dreadfully familiar irritant. I grew too big for most cars (6'7") before I was allowed to drive one. Now at 6'8" and about 400 lbs., I am constantly presented with "one size" public accomodations that are not, in fact, accomodations to me. 400 pounds? So you eat 4000 calories a day, right? You're 6 inches shorter than Shaquille O'Neal, and weigh 80 pounds more? Sure..... Dude, Imagine the kind of BIKE he rides! It's gotta be the Hummer of bicycles, eh? lol Chalo is our resident destructive-testing expert. When he speaks of the durability of frames, wheels, cranks, etc, I listen. The sorts of loads he's capable of putting on stressed parts of the bicycle--especially when he's pushing hard--really test the outer limits. -Luigi |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
No Fat Trucks
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
No Fat Trucks
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:03:49 -0500, Luigi de Guzman
wrote: On 25 Feb 2004 17:22:28 -0800, (Chalo) wrote: So before you go suggesting that SUV gluttony makes one fat, consider that one who is fat for reasons other than gluttony might choose a large, truck-based vehicle simply in order to fit into his or her own car. That is the fault of the manufacturers and the sizeist society at large, not of the big person who is making do. A valid point, Chalo, but it doesn't explain why it seems that a vast number of SUV drivers (especially 'luxury' SUV drivers) seem to be diminuitive white women. They certainly don't need all the extra space, and sometimes I wonder if they can see properly. Are you suggesting rich trophy wives, with no day job? g I'm just askin'... -B They also use those giant suburban-like SUVs as battery rams. I had one cut me off by inches in my car the other day like 'I'm in a Tank, get used to it. I suspect these same ppl use their baby carriages in a similar manner, thrusting them out into the street without really looking to stop traffic and gain safe passage. Even at crosswalks, pause a freakin' second and look will ya? I'm just sayin'... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Young cyclist killed | Brian | General | 208 | February 12th 04 12:09 AM |
Bicycle Rack Mishaps? | NYRides | General | 105 | December 7th 03 03:42 PM |
First road bike: braking? | Alan Hoyle | General | 47 | September 28th 03 11:40 PM |