|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sparrows are a protected species
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sparrows are a protected species
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sparrows are a protected species
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ed-camera.html
Sometimes you need to _force_ an issue. He's done everything exactly right. Bret Cahill |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sparrows are a protected species
On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 6:13:13 AM UTC+1, Bret Cahill wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ed-camera.html Sometimes you need to _force_ an issue. He's done everything exactly right. Bret Cahill Except the sparrows are NOT actually endangered! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sparrows are a protected species
On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 06:13:11 +0100, Bret Cahill wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ed-camera.html Sometimes you need to _force_ an issue. He's done everything exactly right. Bret Cahill Here's an earlier version: http://www.itv.com/news/wales/2017-0...ts-in-swansea/ -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sparrows are a protected species
Kerr Mudd-John wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 06:13:11 +0100, Bret Cahill wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ed-camera.html Sometimes you need to _force_ an issue. He's done everything exactly right. Bret Cahill Here's an earlier version: http://www.itv.com/news/wales/2017-0...ts-in-swansea/ I like this earlier version better. Even if it did confuse you from a distance surely you wouldn't like to admit that to anyone having got a little closer to it. Only a speed merchant could be anything like ****ed off by it enough to complain of its existence. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Sparrows are a protected species
Kerr Mudd-John wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 06:13:11 +0100, Bret Cahill wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ed-camera.html Sometimes you need to _force_ an issue. He's done everything exactly right. Bret Cahill Here's an earlier version: http://www.itv.com/news/wales/2017-0...ts-in-swansea/ Get a life, you sad little **** all. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Sparrows are a protected species
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ed-camera.html
Sometimes you need to _force_ an issue. He's done everything exactly right. Here's an earlier version: http://www.itv.com/news/wales/2017-0...ts-in-swansea/ In many stores esp. in U. S. airports they have life size card board cut outs of guys that look like federal agents. Everyone knows it's a cardboard cutout but just reminding people that someone could be watching reduces theft. The bird box is at least as transparent and honest in that it's only deceptive to those who are driving too fast. If you are a good alert driver going the speed limit then you can read the sign. I would not mount a big crusade to keep anyone, even the state, from doing this. Bret Cahill |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Sparrows are a protected species
On 10/07/17 06:11, Bret Cahill wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ed-camera.html Sometimes you need to _force_ an issue. He's done everything exactly right. Here's an earlier version: http://www.itv.com/news/wales/2017-0...ts-in-swansea/ In many stores esp. in U. S. airports they have life size card board cut outs of guys that look like federal agents. Everyone knows it's a cardboard cutout but just reminding people that someone could be watching reduces theft. The bird box is at least as transparent and honest in that it's only deceptive to those who are driving too fast. If you are a good alert driver going the speed limit then you can read the sign. It isn't just speed merchants. It is about all the not particularly alert drivers going "just over" the limit that has caused all the hoo haa about the "unfairness" of cameras. Since the typical tolerance is 10% + 2mph and that speedometers over read it means that when going "just over" a 30mph limit their needle will be pointing to 40mph or more. That is an example of the level of alertness required of drivers. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Sparrows are a protected species
On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 22:27:00 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Kerr Mudd-John wrote: On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 06:13:11 +0100, Bret Cahill wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ed-camera.html Sometimes you need to _force_ an issue. He's done everything exactly right. Bret Cahill Here's an earlier version: http://www.itv.com/news/wales/2017-0...ts-in-swansea/ Get a life, you sad little **** all. Get your own life, you great big bigot. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Riding a Bicycle Isnąt Protected Expression for First Amendment Purposes | John White | Techniques | 39 | August 21st 13 03:35 AM |
Off Topic - Protected Bike Lanes | JR Namida | Techniques | 24 | January 25th 13 07:55 AM |
Cervelo et al. not to be protected by Canada | Sandy | Techniques | 4 | August 14th 06 01:11 AM |
Eggs protected from breakage by the use of 'polystyrene helmet'. | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 60 | July 13th 04 01:59 PM |
New Sub-species of Stealth Cyclist | Mark Thompson | UK | 64 | December 8th 03 10:02 PM |