![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:02:29 -0800 (PST), jbeattie
wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 4:46:17 PM UTC-8, Duane wrote: Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 15:05, Duane wrote: James wrote: On 17/01/17 04:49, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-04 22:55, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:59:28 -0800, Joerg wrote: Try these: https://www.amazon.com/Sunlite-Thorn.../dp/B000BMT2TM I never looked back. Reviews are mixed and sometimes they do have poor valve attachment. Also, some are thick only towards the running surface and that is less protecting than thick all around. Thanks. I should probably get something like that instead of the cheap tubes that I've been buying. Note that the cheap tubes seem to leak without any riding. I've built wheels, applied pressure, and watched the pressure drop slowly over a period of several days. The leaks are small, difficult to find, tricky to plug without a patch, and very irritating. Yup. Standard bicycle tubes are usually junk. Would you accept it if you had to pump up the tires of your car every two weeks? Yet most cyclists think this is "normal". I prefer pumping up tyres on my road bike every couple of weeks to riding a slug. I don't mind topping off my tire pressure daily just to be sure. Admittedly a bit anal but part of my usual get ready for my ride routine. The idea of two pounds worth of tubes to avoid putting air in my tires doesn't parse at all. That's only a very pleasant side effect for me, not the core reason. The main reason is that I never get flats with thick tubes despite several required offroad stretches on my road bike. Unless a side wall blows but I hope it's just a matter of time until I find road bike tires with better side walls and correct size (not undersized like Gatorskins). Took me almost two years for the MTB but now I am pretty happy there. Especially since those also happen to be the less expsnive tires (from Asia). What good does it do to be 2% faster on a ride when you are 20 miles from home and ... PHSEEEOOOOUUU ...? [...] I think I rarely get more than a flat per year if that and when I do we're talking 10 minutes to replace a tube. It's not the idea of 2% faster, it's carrying all this extra weight and suffering this poor performance to prevent something that rarely occurs. Joerg is content riding heavy, dead tires, even on the road. Some people are like that. I used to ride with a guy who would always carry a back-pack filled with tools. It was penance for some undisclosed sin -- or original sin. Who knows. http://tinyurl.com/zmcjfcl I don't recall him every using one of the tools, nor did I ever see inside the backpack. Judging by its size, I think he had a torch and granite surface plate, just in case he needed quick frame repair. -- Jay Beattie. But at the same time he lusts after a titanium bicycle.... somewhat of an enigma there - a very light bicycle with big heavy tires :-) -- cheers, John B. |
Ads |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:02:29 -0800 (PST), jbeattie
wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 4:46:17 PM UTC-8, Duane wrote: Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 15:05, Duane wrote: James wrote: On 17/01/17 04:49, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-04 22:55, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:59:28 -0800, Joerg wrote: Try these: https://www.amazon.com/Sunlite-Thorn.../dp/B000BMT2TM I never looked back. Reviews are mixed and sometimes they do have poor valve attachment. Also, some are thick only towards the running surface and that is less protecting than thick all around. Thanks. I should probably get something like that instead of the cheap tubes that I've been buying. Note that the cheap tubes seem to leak without any riding. I've built wheels, applied pressure, and watched the pressure drop slowly over a period of several days. The leaks are small, difficult to find, tricky to plug without a patch, and very irritating. Yup. Standard bicycle tubes are usually junk. Would you accept it if you had to pump up the tires of your car every two weeks? Yet most cyclists think this is "normal". I prefer pumping up tyres on my road bike every couple of weeks to riding a slug. I don't mind topping off my tire pressure daily just to be sure. Admittedly a bit anal but part of my usual get ready for my ride routine. The idea of two pounds worth of tubes to avoid putting air in my tires doesn't parse at all. That's only a very pleasant side effect for me, not the core reason. The main reason is that I never get flats with thick tubes despite several required offroad stretches on my road bike. Unless a side wall blows but I hope it's just a matter of time until I find road bike tires with better side walls and correct size (not undersized like Gatorskins). Took me almost two years for the MTB but now I am pretty happy there. Especially since those also happen to be the less expsnive tires (from Asia). What good does it do to be 2% faster on a ride when you are 20 miles from home and ... PHSEEEOOOOUUU ...? [...] I think I rarely get more than a flat per year if that and when I do we're talking 10 minutes to replace a tube. It's not the idea of 2% faster, it's carrying all this extra weight and suffering this poor performance to prevent something that rarely occurs. Joerg is content riding heavy, dead tires, even on the road. Some people are like that. I used to ride with a guy who would always carry a back-pack filled with tools. It was penance for some undisclosed sin -- or original sin. Who knows. http://tinyurl.com/zmcjfcl I don't recall him every using one of the tools, nor did I ever see inside the backpack. Judging by its size, I think he had a torch and granite surface plate, just in case he needed quick frame repair. -- Jay Beattie. Sort of like a bike helmet. One doesn't expect to need it but if one does then it might help :-) (I couldn't resist temptation :-)\ -- cheers, John B. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 4:23:53 PM UTC-8, Joerg wrote:
On 2017-01-16 13:39, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 2:39:18 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:03:05 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 10:43, David Scheidt wrote: Joerg wrote: :Yup. Standard bicycle tubes are usually junk. Would you accept it if you :had to pump up the tires of your car every two weeks? Yet most cyclists :think this is "normal". Automotive tires have a much lower ratio of surface area to volume than bike tires. They're also run a lower pressure, for the most part. Truck tires are often operated around 50psi or higher. Like my MTB tires are. A truck tire weights as a much as TWO UCI minimum race bikes -- or one DH bike. Now throw in the rim. You have peculiar expectations for bicycles. You're theoretically perfect bike would weigh about 250lbs. -- Jay Beattie. I've said it before and I'll say it again. What Joerg's wants in a bicycle are would be met by a 250cc dirt-motorcycle converted to pedal power and the engine removed. I find it astounding that so many others who ride in very harsh conditions do NOT have the breakages or other problems that Joerg does. According to several bicycle shop owners they do. Many said that two factors allowed them to survive as a business: 1. Mountain bikers breaking stuff all the time. 2. Department store bike buyers who needed help and found that the store that sold their bikes was less than helpful. Unlike cars, which never need to be fixed, and that's why there are no auto repair shops. http://tinyurl.com/jba5fgb -- Jay Beattie. |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 10:28:41 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 4:23:53 PM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 13:39, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 2:39:18 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:03:05 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 10:43, David Scheidt wrote: Joerg wrote: :Yup. Standard bicycle tubes are usually junk. Would you accept it if you :had to pump up the tires of your car every two weeks? Yet most cyclists :think this is "normal". Automotive tires have a much lower ratio of surface area to volume than bike tires. They're also run a lower pressure, for the most part. Truck tires are often operated around 50psi or higher. Like my MTB tires are. A truck tire weights as a much as TWO UCI minimum race bikes -- or one DH bike. Now throw in the rim. You have peculiar expectations for bicycles. You're theoretically perfect bike would weigh about 250lbs. -- Jay Beattie. I've said it before and I'll say it again. What Joerg's wants in a bicycle are would be met by a 250cc dirt-motorcycle converted to pedal power and the engine removed. I find it astounding that so many others who ride in very harsh conditions do NOT have the breakages or other problems that Joerg does. According to several bicycle shop owners they do. Many said that two factors allowed them to survive as a business: 1. Mountain bikers breaking stuff all the time. 2. Department store bike buyers who needed help and found that the store that sold their bikes was less than helpful. Unlike cars, which never need to be fixed, and that's why there are no auto repair shops. http://tinyurl.com/jba5fgb -- Jay Beattie. Read Joerg's post from over the years and you'll see that Joerg takes great delight in complaining. Joerg does not want/need a bicycle - he needs/wants a pedal powered motorcycle. For his bicycle he should just buy solid rubber tires and be done with every needing to fix a flat or pump them up. Cheers |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 23:05:43 -0000 (UTC), Duane
wrote: The idea of two pounds worth of tubes to avoid putting air in my tires doesn't parse at all. Let's do it by the numbers. The tubes I usually buy are these: http://www.nashbar.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_10053_10052_175629_-1___205038 26x1.5" for $4.79ea. They weigh 176g (0.39 lbs) and they leak air. The proposed leak proof tubes: https://www.amazon.com/Sunlite-Thorn-Resistant-Presta-Valve/dp/B0063R2GJW/ 26x1.5" for $15.36ea. These weigh 572g (1.26 lbs). For two tires, that a difference of: 2 * (1.26 - 0.39) = 1.74 lbs (789g) Not quite 2 lbs but close enough. The average 26x1.5" tire seems to weigh about 550g (1.2 lbs). Ignoring the weight of the wheel, with these tubes the rotating weight will increase by: 1.74 / (2 * (1.2 + 0.39)) = 55% Offhand, it seems a bit too heavy to be worthwhile. Please note that my original problem was not to find the best thorn proof tire, but rather one that doesn't leak out of the box. I don't seem to experience any sudden releases of air, but instead get slow leaks. On the wheels in question, I ride on pavement. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:51:38 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 23:05:43 -0000 (UTC), Duane wrote: The idea of two pounds worth of tubes to avoid putting air in my tires doesn't parse at all. Let's do it by the numbers. The tubes I usually buy are these: http://www.nashbar.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_10053_10052_175629_-1___205038 26x1.5" for $4.79ea. They weigh 176g (0.39 lbs) and they leak air. The proposed leak proof tubes: https://www.amazon.com/Sunlite-Thorn-Resistant-Presta-Valve/dp/B0063R2GJW/ 26x1.5" for $15.36ea. These weigh 572g (1.26 lbs). For two tires, that a difference of: 2 * (1.26 - 0.39) = 1.74 lbs (789g) Not quite 2 lbs but close enough. The average 26x1.5" tire seems to weigh about 550g (1.2 lbs). Ignoring the weight of the wheel, with these tubes the rotating weight will increase by: 1.74 / (2 * (1.2 + 0.39)) = 55% Offhand, it seems a bit too heavy to be worthwhile. Please note that my original problem was not to find the best thorn proof tire, but rather one that doesn't leak out of the box. I don't seem to experience any sudden releases of air, but instead get slow leaks. On the wheels in question, I ride on pavement. Inner tubes come in a myriad types and prices. If you buy the absolute lightest, thinnest, tubes, they will leak, but if you buy thicker inner tubes they will usually be cheaper and may leak a bit but not to the "pump them up every day" extent. It used to be that "sew ups", or "tubular's", were the last word in bicycle tires and, as I remember it, they did require pumping up practically every time you got on the bike. (and I don't remember anyone complaining about it :-) -- cheers, John B. |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:38:15 PM UTC-8, John B. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:51:38 -0800, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 23:05:43 -0000 (UTC), Duane wrote: The idea of two pounds worth of tubes to avoid putting air in my tires doesn't parse at all. Let's do it by the numbers. The tubes I usually buy are these: http://www.nashbar.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_10053_10052_175629_-1___205038 26x1.5" for $4.79ea. They weigh 176g (0.39 lbs) and they leak air. The proposed leak proof tubes: https://www.amazon.com/Sunlite-Thorn-Resistant-Presta-Valve/dp/B0063R2GJW/ 26x1.5" for $15.36ea. These weigh 572g (1.26 lbs). For two tires, that a difference of: 2 * (1.26 - 0.39) = 1.74 lbs (789g) Not quite 2 lbs but close enough. The average 26x1.5" tire seems to weigh about 550g (1.2 lbs). Ignoring the weight of the wheel, with these tubes the rotating weight will increase by: 1.74 / (2 * (1.2 + 0.39)) = 55% Offhand, it seems a bit too heavy to be worthwhile. Please note that my original problem was not to find the best thorn proof tire, but rather one that doesn't leak out of the box. I don't seem to experience any sudden releases of air, but instead get slow leaks. On the wheels in question, I ride on pavement. Inner tubes come in a myriad types and prices. If you buy the absolute lightest, thinnest, tubes, they will leak, but if you buy thicker inner tubes they will usually be cheaper and may leak a bit but not to the "pump them up every day" extent. It used to be that "sew ups", or "tubular's", were the last word in bicycle tires and, as I remember it, they did require pumping up practically every time you got on the bike. (and I don't remember anyone complaining about it :-) Tubulars are still the last word in bicycle tires and what the pros ride, but they have professional support staff who are physically fit and skilled in the complex operation of floor pumps and other precision machinery. Most of us do not have the intelligence or fitness necessary to operate a floor pump -- and certainly not on a daily basis. My wife and I have more robust tires on our bike that we have professionally pumped once a year. http://www.loupiote.com/photos_m/796...re-bicycle.jpg -- Jay Beattie. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/16/2017 11:10 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 10:28:41 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 4:23:53 PM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 13:39, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 2:39:18 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:03:05 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 10:43, David Scheidt wrote: Joerg wrote: :Yup. Standard bicycle tubes are usually junk. Would you accept it if you :had to pump up the tires of your car every two weeks? Yet most cyclists :think this is "normal". Automotive tires have a much lower ratio of surface area to volume than bike tires. They're also run a lower pressure, for the most part. Truck tires are often operated around 50psi or higher. Like my MTB tires are. A truck tire weights as a much as TWO UCI minimum race bikes -- or one DH bike. Now throw in the rim. You have peculiar expectations for bicycles. You're theoretically perfect bike would weigh about 250lbs. -- Jay Beattie. I've said it before and I'll say it again. What Joerg's wants in a bicycle are would be met by a 250cc dirt-motorcycle converted to pedal power and the engine removed. I find it astounding that so many others who ride in very harsh conditions do NOT have the breakages or other problems that Joerg does. According to several bicycle shop owners they do. Many said that two factors allowed them to survive as a business: 1. Mountain bikers breaking stuff all the time. 2. Department store bike buyers who needed help and found that the store that sold their bikes was less than helpful. Unlike cars, which never need to be fixed, and that's why there are no auto repair shops. http://tinyurl.com/jba5fgb -- Jay Beattie. Read Joerg's post from over the years and you'll see that Joerg takes great delight in complaining. Joerg does not want/need a bicycle - he needs/wants a pedal powered motorcycle. For his bicycle he should just buy solid rubber tires and be done with every needing to fix a flat or pump them up. Seriously, Joerg, why are you _not_ using solid tires? (I mean, except for the general principle that nothing ever works for Joerg.) Yes, they would be heavy and slow, but you've said dozens of times that you don't care about that. They would be rugged and thorn proof. The sidewalls would never blow out. Is it because you'd have to stop typing your sound effects? ("Kabloooeeee!") -- - Frank Krygowski |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-01-16 18:04, John B. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:11:50 -0800, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 16:50, John B. wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:16:51 -0800, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-05 02:04, Tosspot wrote: On 04/01/17 20:05, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-03 17:04, Joerg wrote: Gentlemen, Is there something stronger than the usual rubber cement in the patch kits? Ideally something that won't dry out so fast or where multiple cheap small tubes are available. The reason is that I sometimes have larger holes from side wall blow-outs. Not inch-long gashes but one or two tenths of an inch long. The tubes I use are super thick and, therefore, expensive. $15-20 each and that's not something to be thrown out lightly. Instead of the li'l REMA patches I need to use thicker rubber from an older sacrified tube but this has to be vulcanized/cemented really well. Thanks to all responders (also Barry and Doug). I'll order Slime Rubber Cement with my next Amazon shipment because that's what David uses, he says it works well and it isn't expensive: https://www.amazon.com/Slime-1050-Ru.../dp/B003V9UU66 Whatwhat!! Are you *seriously* claiming r.b.t has been useful!? What ever is the world coming to? Usenet is very useful, I guess that's where the name comes from. A lot of hints here go into my bicycle files, in the sense of "If ... ever breaks consider replacing it with ..." or "If it breaks don't ever use ...". When I mentioned in a post in a newsgroup that I had bonked, want to avoid it but can't stand the cyclist astronaut food or any sweet stuff someone responded with a link to a recipe for homemade non-sweet power bars. My wife bakes them to this day. Yesterday I shared these bars with another rider who really likes them as well. Can't buy them anywhere. Out of curiosity, is your wife's recipe actually free of sugar, in any form, or it just doesn't taste sweet? It has a pinch of sugar for some reason, not sure if that can be left out or replaced with something else. You can't taste it though. While they also mention just a pinch of salt we add several pinches because in summer one sweats out a lot of salt here. Got it only in German but if really interested I could translate it: http://www.chefkoch.de/rezepte/14555...sliriegel.html It's a little more work than it looks like, with the bacon and all that, and cutting into bars at the end so they can be packed on a bicycle. My wife puts all of them into the freezer and then moves as many as needed to the fridge a couple days before rides. That looks like a recipe for some sort of Oatmeal cookies with bacon, rather than the usual "power Bar" concept, which is usually something that your body can get a quick bunch of energy from to replace what you have lost. I make sure I eat them during a scheduled break at some nice and scenic area, not after I begin to feel a hard bonk coming up. The latter is a mistake I only made once and don't want to experience that again. These bar get me through the rides quite nicely. Usually 40-45 miles, partially under a lot of power. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-01-16 17:30, John B. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:23:53 -0800, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 13:39, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 2:39:18 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:03:05 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 10:43, David Scheidt wrote: Joerg wrote: :Yup. Standard bicycle tubes are usually junk. Would you accept it if you :had to pump up the tires of your car every two weeks? Yet most cyclists :think this is "normal". Automotive tires have a much lower ratio of surface area to volume than bike tires. They're also run a lower pressure, for the most part. Truck tires are often operated around 50psi or higher. Like my MTB tires are. A truck tire weights as a much as TWO UCI minimum race bikes -- or one DH bike. Now throw in the rim. You have peculiar expectations for bicycles. You're theoretically perfect bike would weigh about 250lbs. -- Jay Beattie. I've said it before and I'll say it again. What Joerg's wants in a bicycle are would be met by a 250cc dirt-motorcycle converted to pedal power and the engine removed. I find it astounding that so many others who ride in very harsh conditions do NOT have the breakages or other problems that Joerg does. According to several bicycle shop owners they do. Many said that two factors allowed them to survive as a business: 1. Mountain bikers breaking stuff all the time. 2. Department store bike buyers who needed help and found that the store that sold their bikes was less than helpful. Strange. My LBS is a chain of two large shops in Bangkok, and a large number of agents scattered all over the country, and is the largest bicycle business in Thailand. They sell predominantly road bikes and the sales manager tells me that a very large portion of the bikes that they sell are Carbon. In fact she said that it was much easier to sell a carbon bike than an aluminum bike. Well, Bangkok is a hardcore urban area. What I meant is where I live which isn't really urban. Do you live in some poor, improvised, area where people can't afford decent equipment :-? Many MTB riders out here do not believe in carbon and neither do I. I wonder whether Andrew's business depends on broken mountain bikes and cheap walmart stuff? It's what I heard a lot here. In recent years that has changed and new shops sprang up after the bike path and MTB trail system was expanded. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cement for Rubber? | Rocket J Squirrel[_2_] | Techniques | 11 | September 24th 10 09:59 AM |
Elmer's Rubber Cement is not the vulcanizing kind! | Ablang | General | 76 | May 4th 09 10:04 AM |
Elmer's Rubber Cement is not the vulcanizing kind! | Nick L Plate | Techniques | 3 | April 30th 09 02:54 PM |
Elmer's Rubber Cement is not the vulcanizing kind! | Tom Keats | Techniques | 12 | April 28th 09 05:30 AM |
crappy rubber cement? | Duncan | Australia | 13 | June 8th 07 08:48 PM |