![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
analog,
I will not explain tire mounting again. Retard at your own speed |
Ads |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 5:04:38 PM UTC-8, Joerg wrote:
Gentlemen, Is there something stronger than the usual rubber cement in the patch kits? Ideally something that won't dry out so fast or where multiple cheap small tubes are available. The reason is that I sometimes have larger holes from side wall blow-outs. Not inch-long gashes but one or two tenths of an inch long. The tubes I use are super thick and, therefore, expensive. $15-20 each and that's not something to be thrown out lightly. Instead of the li'l REMA patches I need to use thicker rubber from an older sacrified tube but this has to be vulcanized/cemented really well. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ Tubulars by design are more puncture resistant than clinchers. Continental tubulars are amazingly puncture resistant tires. My Sprinters have never flatted on me and are my standard tire when on road bike rides. Only their extra-light stuff like Podiums have ever flatted on me. |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 3:26:13 PM UTC-8, DATAKOLL MARINE RESEARCH wrote:
analog, I will not explain tire mounting again. Retard at your own speed I shall talk with this Humongous. I'm sure he's a reasonable man. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gecX6ofQJHc |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:52:53 -0600, AMuzi wrote:
On 1/16/2017 7:30 PM, John B. wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:23:53 -0800, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 13:39, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 2:39:18 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:03:05 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 10:43, David Scheidt wrote: Joerg wrote: :Yup. Standard bicycle tubes are usually junk. Would you accept it if you :had to pump up the tires of your car every two weeks? Yet most cyclists :think this is "normal". Automotive tires have a much lower ratio of surface area to volume than bike tires. They're also run a lower pressure, for the most part. Truck tires are often operated around 50psi or higher. Like my MTB tires are. A truck tire weights as a much as TWO UCI minimum race bikes -- or one DH bike. Now throw in the rim. You have peculiar expectations for bicycles. You're theoretically perfect bike would weigh about 250lbs. -- Jay Beattie. I've said it before and I'll say it again. What Joerg's wants in a bicycle are would be met by a 250cc dirt-motorcycle converted to pedal power and the engine removed. I find it astounding that so many others who ride in very harsh conditions do NOT have the breakages or other problems that Joerg does. According to several bicycle shop owners they do. Many said that two factors allowed them to survive as a business: 1. Mountain bikers breaking stuff all the time. 2. Department store bike buyers who needed help and found that the store that sold their bikes was less than helpful. Strange. My LBS is a chain of two large shops in Bangkok, and a large number of agents scattered all over the country, and is the largest bicycle business in Thailand. They sell predominantly road bikes and the sales manager tells me that a very large portion of the bikes that they sell are Carbon. In fact she said that it was much easier to sell a carbon bike than an aluminum bike. Do you live in some poor, improvised, area where people can't afford decent equipment :-? I wonder whether Andrew's business depends on broken mountain bikes and cheap walmart stuff? We don't depend on it. But we've outlived a great number of other shops in part because we are not snobs and are as helpful as patience permits with the usual crap. The owners of the usual crap are just as human as anyone else and respond well to a kind word. You have discovered the secret of success :-) Be a nice guy. Years ago I patronized a tiny little hardware shop because the old guy (been there for years) that ran it seemed to want to help the customer. I needed a 3 foot section of "heat tape" once to reach all the way to the end of my new water pipe and he ordered it from Boston. A $3.00 item. Eventually the old fellow either died or retired and his son took over and he was not only a surly brute but the "bottom line" became the critical factor. Sure he'd order something from Boston... if it was a $50 order. The shop closed in about a year. I'm thinking here of a particular customer. He bought a stereo system which included a 'free' bike. Two other shops gave him an earful and threw him out. Our employee adjusted the seat and bars, made the brakes functional and improved it from a death trap to a lousy bicycle in a few minutes' time. He became a regular customer for many years with new very nice bikes eventually. Quick frame repair during a party while wearing a hula skirt: http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfr...t/hulaweld.jpg Owner needed it ASAP to go to work. -- Cheers, John B. |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:27:27 -0500, Frank Krygowski
wrote: On 1/16/2017 11:10 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 10:28:41 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 4:23:53 PM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 13:39, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 2:39:18 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:03:05 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 10:43, David Scheidt wrote: Joerg wrote: :Yup. Standard bicycle tubes are usually junk. Would you accept it if you :had to pump up the tires of your car every two weeks? Yet most cyclists :think this is "normal". Automotive tires have a much lower ratio of surface area to volume than bike tires. They're also run a lower pressure, for the most part. Truck tires are often operated around 50psi or higher. Like my MTB tires are. A truck tire weights as a much as TWO UCI minimum race bikes -- or one DH bike. Now throw in the rim. You have peculiar expectations for bicycles. You're theoretically perfect bike would weigh about 250lbs. -- Jay Beattie. I've said it before and I'll say it again. What Joerg's wants in a bicycle are would be met by a 250cc dirt-motorcycle converted to pedal power and the engine removed. I find it astounding that so many others who ride in very harsh conditions do NOT have the breakages or other problems that Joerg does. According to several bicycle shop owners they do. Many said that two factors allowed them to survive as a business: 1. Mountain bikers breaking stuff all the time. 2. Department store bike buyers who needed help and found that the store that sold their bikes was less than helpful. Unlike cars, which never need to be fixed, and that's why there are no auto repair shops. http://tinyurl.com/jba5fgb -- Jay Beattie. Read Joerg's post from over the years and you'll see that Joerg takes great delight in complaining. Joerg does not want/need a bicycle - he needs/wants a pedal powered motorcycle. For his bicycle he should just buy solid rubber tires and be done with every needing to fix a flat or pump them up. Seriously, Joerg, why are you _not_ using solid tires? (I mean, except for the general principle that nothing ever works for Joerg.) Yes, they would be heavy and slow, but you've said dozens of times that you don't care about that. They would be rugged and thorn proof. The sidewalls would never blow out. Is it because you'd have to stop typing your sound effects? ("Kabloooeeee!") After the "Ka pow" post I got to thinking. I've never seen a tire sidewall fail except when the tire was run with no, or very low, pressure. It is fairly common on large trucks. One tire of a dual tire set gets a leak and runs flat for a while and the heat build up causes the tire to nearly disintegrate. My wife had one a while ago. Never checks her tires and set off on a 300 Km trip on a high speed highway with "soft" tires. Ka pow! -- Cheers, John B. |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:55:12 +1100, James
wrote: Why not put some of Stans goop in the inner tubes and seal them from the inside? http://www.notubes.com http://www.notubes.com/Sealant-C14.aspx http://www.notubes.com/help/tubelessexplainedanddemystified.aspx Kinda looks like it's made to allow mountain bikes to run without any tubes by filling the tires with I suspect is expanding urethane foam. I guess I haven't done this because my rims are not air tight, my tires probably don't make a good seal with the rim, and I really don't need such a drastic change. All I need are inner tubes that don't slowly leak. However, there are some claims on the last URL that tubeless tires have a lower rolling resistance. No numbers found, so I'll treat that as speculation. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:50:19 -0800, Joerg
wrote: On 2017-01-16 19:28, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 4:23:53 PM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 13:39, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 2:39:18 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:03:05 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 10:43, David Scheidt wrote: Joerg wrote: :Yup. Standard bicycle tubes are usually junk. Would you accept it if you :had to pump up the tires of your car every two weeks? Yet most cyclists :think this is "normal". Automotive tires have a much lower ratio of surface area to volume than bike tires. They're also run a lower pressure, for the most part. Truck tires are often operated around 50psi or higher. Like my MTB tires are. A truck tire weights as a much as TWO UCI minimum race bikes -- or one DH bike. Now throw in the rim. You have peculiar expectations for bicycles. You're theoretically perfect bike would weigh about 250lbs. -- Jay Beattie. I've said it before and I'll say it again. What Joerg's wants in a bicycle are would be met by a 250cc dirt-motorcycle converted to pedal power and the engine removed. I find it astounding that so many others who ride in very harsh conditions do NOT have the breakages or other problems that Joerg does. According to several bicycle shop owners they do. Many said that two factors allowed them to survive as a business: 1. Mountain bikers breaking stuff all the time. 2. Department store bike buyers who needed help and found that the store that sold their bikes was less than helpful. Unlike cars, which never need to be fixed, and that's why there are no auto repair shops. http://tinyurl.com/jba5fgb Care to compare the number of vehicles plus the miles traveled? Maybe then it becomes more clear. Cars are way more reliable than bicycles. Especially if you buy top quality cars like we did. Other than regular scheduled maintenance there were no breakdowns in the whole two decades we own them. None, as in zero. Not even one flat tire. Try that with a bicycle. You talk about your auto escapades as hauling a half a cord of wood in your SUV. You describe your bicycle riding as speeding down rocky hills, leaping over bumps and unexpectedly diving into lakes. If you drove your car the way that you claim to ride your bike I think that you would have a very different concept of how bullet proof your car is. I've spent considerable time around trucks that haul heavy loads over unimproved roads and my experience was that they definitely did require frequent repairs. I've also been around off the road racing cars and they took even more maintenance than the trucks. As usual, you are not comparing apples and apples. -- Cheers, John B. |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 06:48:12 -0800 (PST), jbeattie
wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:38:15 PM UTC-8, John B. wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:51:38 -0800, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 23:05:43 -0000 (UTC), Duane wrote: The idea of two pounds worth of tubes to avoid putting air in my tires doesn't parse at all. Let's do it by the numbers. The tubes I usually buy are these: http://www.nashbar.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_10053_10052_175629_-1___205038 26x1.5" for $4.79ea. They weigh 176g (0.39 lbs) and they leak air. The proposed leak proof tubes: https://www.amazon.com/Sunlite-Thorn-Resistant-Presta-Valve/dp/B0063R2GJW/ 26x1.5" for $15.36ea. These weigh 572g (1.26 lbs). For two tires, that a difference of: 2 * (1.26 - 0.39) = 1.74 lbs (789g) Not quite 2 lbs but close enough. The average 26x1.5" tire seems to weigh about 550g (1.2 lbs). Ignoring the weight of the wheel, with these tubes the rotating weight will increase by: 1.74 / (2 * (1.2 + 0.39)) = 55% Offhand, it seems a bit too heavy to be worthwhile. Please note that my original problem was not to find the best thorn proof tire, but rather one that doesn't leak out of the box. I don't seem to experience any sudden releases of air, but instead get slow leaks. On the wheels in question, I ride on pavement. Inner tubes come in a myriad types and prices. If you buy the absolute lightest, thinnest, tubes, they will leak, but if you buy thicker inner tubes they will usually be cheaper and may leak a bit but not to the "pump them up every day" extent. It used to be that "sew ups", or "tubular's", were the last word in bicycle tires and, as I remember it, they did require pumping up practically every time you got on the bike. (and I don't remember anyone complaining about it :-) Tubulars are still the last word in bicycle tires and what the pros ride, but they have professional support staff who are physically fit and skilled in the complex operation of floor pumps and other precision machinery. Most of us do not have the intelligence or fitness necessary to operate a floor pump -- and certainly not on a daily basis. My wife and I have more robust tires on our bike that we have professionally pumped once a year. http://www.loupiote.com/photos_m/796...re-bicycle.jpg -- Jay Beattie. Gee, the U.S. must be a real "Alice" country. Professional tire pumpers :-) -- Cheers, John B. |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:33:24 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:38:12 +0700, John B. wrote: Inner tubes come in a myriad types and prices. If you buy the absolute lightest, thinnest, tubes, they will leak, but if you buy thicker inner tubes they will usually be cheaper and may leak a bit but not to the "pump them up every day" extent. Yep. That was also my theory. I would buy the cheapest tubes available from a reputable discounter and expect to receive moderately heavy and presumably thick inner tubes. I don't have a small collection of cheap inner tubes. All seem to leak very slowly. I keep planning to drag a few tubes down to the local auto tire dealer, who has a proper dunk tank, and look for bubbles. I expect the leaks to be really obvious as inflating the inner tube to a low pressure without it being confined in a tire, causes any tiny holes to greatly expand. For what it's worth, the tubes that seem to leak the least were bought at a department store (K-mart). It used to be that "sew ups", or "tubular's", were the last word in bicycle tires and, as I remember it, they did require pumping up practically every time you got on the bike. (and I don't remember anyone complaining about it :-) I have a set of wheels with sew ups somewhere. I last used them maybe 40 years ago. I've never raced, so sew ups offer no benefits to me. I wonder if they still will hold air? When you have a flat they are much faster to fix. Just rip the flat off the rim and stick on another from the collection you have strapped under the seat :-) -- Cheers, John B. |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 5:59:34 PM UTC-8, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:50:19 -0800, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 19:28, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 4:23:53 PM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 13:39, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 2:39:18 PM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:03:05 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2017-01-16 10:43, David Scheidt wrote: Joerg wrote: :Yup. Standard bicycle tubes are usually junk. Would you accept it if you :had to pump up the tires of your car every two weeks? Yet most cyclists :think this is "normal". Automotive tires have a much lower ratio of surface area to volume than bike tires. They're also run a lower pressure, for the most part. Truck tires are often operated around 50psi or higher. Like my MTB tires are. A truck tire weights as a much as TWO UCI minimum race bikes -- or one DH bike. Now throw in the rim. You have peculiar expectations for bicycles. You're theoretically perfect bike would weigh about 250lbs. -- Jay Beattie. I've said it before and I'll say it again. What Joerg's wants in a bicycle are would be met by a 250cc dirt-motorcycle converted to pedal power and the engine removed. I find it astounding that so many others who ride in very harsh conditions do NOT have the breakages or other problems that Joerg does. According to several bicycle shop owners they do. Many said that two factors allowed them to survive as a business: 1. Mountain bikers breaking stuff all the time. 2. Department store bike buyers who needed help and found that the store that sold their bikes was less than helpful. Unlike cars, which never need to be fixed, and that's why there are no auto repair shops. http://tinyurl.com/jba5fgb Care to compare the number of vehicles plus the miles traveled? Maybe then it becomes more clear. Cars are way more reliable than bicycles. Especially if you buy top quality cars like we did. Other than regular scheduled maintenance there were no breakdowns in the whole two decades we own them. None, as in zero. Not even one flat tire. Try that with a bicycle. You talk about your auto escapades as hauling a half a cord of wood in your SUV. You describe your bicycle riding as speeding down rocky hills, leaping over bumps and unexpectedly diving into lakes. If you drove your car the way that you claim to ride your bike I think that you would have a very different concept of how bullet proof your car is. I've spent considerable time around trucks that haul heavy loads over unimproved roads and my experience was that they definitely did require frequent repairs. I've also been around off the road racing cars and they took even more maintenance than the trucks. As usual, you are not comparing apples and apples. I ride with a guy who races motorcycles. He can go through a set of tires over the course of weekend -- and they cost a mint. Talk about an expensive hobby. -- Jay Beattie. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cement for Rubber? | Rocket J Squirrel[_2_] | Techniques | 11 | September 24th 10 09:59 AM |
Elmer's Rubber Cement is not the vulcanizing kind! | Ablang | General | 76 | May 4th 09 10:04 AM |
Elmer's Rubber Cement is not the vulcanizing kind! | Nick L Plate | Techniques | 3 | April 30th 09 02:54 PM |
Elmer's Rubber Cement is not the vulcanizing kind! | Tom Keats | Techniques | 12 | April 28th 09 05:30 AM |
crappy rubber cement? | Duncan | Australia | 13 | June 8th 07 08:48 PM |