|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Trek 2100 Carbon?
Would this be a good bike for just general recreational road riding?
I believe it's a 1998 model supposedly in "fantastic condition." Wasn't looking for anything like this at all but it came up for a price well within my discretionary spending budget. Am thinking this bike may be more serious than I am thanks, Nate |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Trek 2100 Carbon?
On Apr 8, 11:53*am, N8N wrote:
Would this be a good bike for just general recreational road riding? If you ride on sunny days with smooth roads and it fits--you'll have plenty of fun with it. I personally wouldn't want to own just a gee whiz fast bike as my only bike--but if it fits you and your needs, go for it. Have a good look at the frame and fork before buying. Look for deep scratches and cracks. If it's "well used", walk away. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Trek 2100 Carbon?
On Apr 8, 1:35*pm, landotter wrote:
On Apr 8, 11:53*am, N8N wrote: Would this be a good bike for just general recreational road riding? If you ride on sunny days with smooth roads and it fits--you'll have plenty of fun with it. I personally wouldn't want to own just a gee whiz fast bike as my only bike--but if it fits you and your needs, go for it. Have a good look at the frame and fork before buying. Look for deep scratches and cracks. If it's "well used", walk away. Well, I *do* own a 20 year old Porsche as my "real" car, if that gives you any kind of idea as to what makes my ears wiggle I even put snow tires on it in the winter, which no doubt gives the "purists" apoplectic fits. nate |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Trek 2100 Carbon?
On Apr 8, 12:46*pm, N8N wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:35*pm, landotter wrote: On Apr 8, 11:53*am, N8N wrote: Would this be a good bike for just general recreational road riding? If you ride on sunny days with smooth roads and it fits--you'll have plenty of fun with it. I personally wouldn't want to own just a gee whiz fast bike as my only bike--but if it fits you and your needs, go for it. Have a good look at the frame and fork before buying. Look for deep scratches and cracks. If it's "well used", walk away. Well, I *do* own a 20 year old Porsche as my "real" car, if that gives you any kind of idea as to what makes my ears wiggle *I even put snow tires on it in the winter, which no doubt gives the "purists" apoplectic fits. Well, I wouldn't say that riding a 2100 is similarly idiosyncratic. A Porsche is at least a little domesticated--it's not like you're driving a 52 MGB. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Trek 2100 Carbon?
On Apr 8, 1:57*pm, landotter wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:46*pm, N8N wrote: On Apr 8, 1:35*pm, landotter wrote: On Apr 8, 11:53*am, N8N wrote: Would this be a good bike for just general recreational road riding? If you ride on sunny days with smooth roads and it fits--you'll have plenty of fun with it. I personally wouldn't want to own just a gee whiz fast bike as my only bike--but if it fits you and your needs, go for it. Have a good look at the frame and fork before buying. Look for deep scratches and cracks. If it's "well used", walk away. Well, I *do* own a 20 year old Porsche as my "real" car, if that gives you any kind of idea as to what makes my ears wiggle *I even put snow tires on it in the winter, which no doubt gives the "purists" apoplectic fits. Well, I wouldn't say that riding a 2100 is similarly idiosyncratic. A Porsche is at least a little domesticated--it's not like you're driving a 52 MGB. (thread digression) wouldn't a '52 be a TD not a B? I'd probably find it too slow (says the guy who drives a 944, but this is all hypothetical, right?) but I wouldn't kick a TR-6 or Austin Healey out of my driveway for leaking oil. hmm, actually I can't kick anything out of my driveway for leaking oil, as my current rides are the P-car, a '55 Studebaker, and an old Ford pickup, none of which are particularly well known for fluid retention. I think the Studebaker may actually be the dryest of the lot Now that you mention it, there *is* an old MGA sitting in some guy's driveway down the street, and I haven't seen it move in a year and a half... must... resist... temptation... nate |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
OT: Oil Usage
N8N aka Nate Nagel wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:57 pm, landotter wrote: On Apr 8, 12:46 pm, N8N wrote: On Apr 8, 1:35 pm, landotter wrote: On Apr 8, 11:53 am, N8N wrote: Would this be a good bike for just general recreational road riding? If you ride on sunny days with smooth roads and it fits--you'll have plenty of fun with it. I personally wouldn't want to own just a gee whiz fast bike as my only bike--but if it fits you and your needs, go for it. Have a good look at the frame and fork before buying. Look for deep scratches and cracks. If it's "well used", walk away. Well, I *do* own a 20 year old Porsche as my "real" car, if that gives you any kind of idea as to what makes my ears wiggle I even put snow tires on it in the winter, which no doubt gives the "purists" apoplectic fits. Well, I wouldn't say that riding a 2100 is similarly idiosyncratic. A Porsche is at least a little domesticated--it's not like you're driving a 52 MGB. (thread digression) wouldn't a '52 be a TD not a B? I'd probably find it too slow (says the guy who drives a 944, but this is all hypothetical, right?) but I wouldn't kick a TR-6 or Austin Healey out of my driveway for leaking oil. hmm, actually I can't kick anything out of my driveway for leaking oil, as my current rides are the P-car, a '55 Studebaker, and an old Ford pickup, none of which are particularly well known for fluid retention. I think the Studebaker may actually be the dryest of the lot I beat my 1994 Civic Si for 160,000 miles with no measurable oil usage. The SRAM 3x7 hub on my RANS Tailwind uses more oil. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Trek 2100 Carbon?
N8N aka Nate Nagel wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:35 pm, landotter wrote: On Apr 8, 11:53 am, N8N wrote: Would this be a good bike for just general recreational road riding? If you ride on sunny days with smooth roads and it fits--you'll have plenty of fun with it. I personally wouldn't want to own just a gee whiz fast bike as my only bike--but if it fits you and your needs, go for it. Have a good look at the frame and fork before buying. Look for deep scratches and cracks. If it's "well used", walk away. Well, I *do* own a 20 year old Porsche as my "real" car, if that gives you any kind of idea as to what makes my ears wiggle I even put snow tires on it in the winter, which no doubt gives the "purists" apoplectic fits. This is what a vintage Porsche would look like if you drove around here for a few winters: http://content.leenks.com/pics/2008/oldexotics/oldexotics-6.jpg. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Trek 2100 Carbon?
On Apr 9, 1:32*am, Tom Sherman
wrote: N8N aka Nate Nagel wrote: On Apr 8, 1:35 pm, landotter wrote: On Apr 8, 11:53 am, N8N wrote: Would this be a good bike for just general recreational road riding? If you ride on sunny days with smooth roads and it fits--you'll have plenty of fun with it. I personally wouldn't want to own just a gee whiz fast bike as my only bike--but if it fits you and your needs, go for it. Have a good look at the frame and fork before buying. Look for deep scratches and cracks. If it's "well used", walk away. Well, I *do* own a 20 year old Porsche as my "real" car, if that gives you any kind of idea as to what makes my ears wiggle *I even put snow tires on it in the winter, which no doubt gives the "purists" apoplectic fits. This is what a vintage Porsche would look like if you drove around here for a few winters: http://content.leenks.com/pics/2008/oldexotics/oldexotics-6.jpg. Can't see your pic at work and it's probably just as well... truth is, that since the mid-70s Porsche has used all galvanized steel as well as adding that typical German paraffin undercoating, so they're actually fairly rust resistant as far as car bodies go. Actually surprisingly practical, if you can just get past the cost of parts. Of course a VW GTI or Scirocco is 90% of the fun for 50% of the cost, but I never said that all my purchasing decisions made perfect sense. nate |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Trek 2100 Carbon?
N8N aka Nate Nagel wrote:
On Apr 9, 1:32 am, Tom Sherman wrote: N8N aka Nate Nagel wrote: On Apr 8, 1:35 pm, landotter wrote: On Apr 8, 11:53 am, N8N wrote: Would this be a good bike for just general recreational road riding? If you ride on sunny days with smooth roads and it fits--you'll have plenty of fun with it. I personally wouldn't want to own just a gee whiz fast bike as my only bike--but if it fits you and your needs, go for it. Have a good look at the frame and fork before buying. Look for deep scratches and cracks. If it's "well used", walk away. Well, I *do* own a 20 year old Porsche as my "real" car, if that gives you any kind of idea as to what makes my ears wiggle I even put snow tires on it in the winter, which no doubt gives the "purists" apoplectic fits. This is what a vintage Porsche would look like if you drove around here for a few winters: http://content.leenks.com/pics/2008/oldexotics/oldexotics-6.jpg. Can't see your pic at work and it's probably just as well... It is the rotting, er rusting corpse of a (early 1970's?) Porsche 911. Full collection of "exotics" that have seen better days is he http://www.leenks.com/gallery641.htm. truth is, that since the mid-70s Porsche has used all galvanized steel as well as adding that typical German paraffin undercoating, so they're actually fairly rust resistant as far as car bodies go. Actually surprisingly practical, if you can just get past the cost of parts. Well, all the suspension bits, brakes, etc. will still rust up. Eventually, it will not be worth it to repair the vehicle, unless it is something where the ID plate is worth more than the cost of a complete rebuild (e.g. 250 GTO). Of course a VW GTI or Scirocco is 90% of the fun for 50% of the cost, but I never said that all my purchasing decisions made perfect sense. Here is the car I really want: http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc214/vt1992s10/100_0467.jpg. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Trek 2100 Carbon?
On Apr 8, 12:53*pm, N8N wrote:
Would this be a good bike for just general recreational road riding? I believe it's a 1998 model supposedly in "fantastic condition." Wasn't looking for anything like this at all but it came up for a price well within my discretionary spending budget. *Am thinking this bike may be more serious than I am thanks, Nate From what I know about you and your uses/interests, I'd probably stay away from carbon frames and low spoke count wheels. I think you were on the right track with a Surly, or maybe a JTS. Even the cross bike your LBS tried to sell you... something other than carbon with wheels that have few spokes. It's kinda like having an old lotus as a daily driver. Sure, they're fun, but as a regular driver? Then again, a lot depends on your weight and the condition of your local roads and paths. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Trek 2100 alum/carbon single speed f/f | Charles Stickle | Marketplace | 0 | January 23rd 05 10:34 PM |
FS: Trek 2100 alum/carbon single speed f/f | Charles Stickle | Marketplace | 0 | December 10th 04 01:51 AM |
FS:Trek 2100 alum/carbon | Charles Stickle | Marketplace | 0 | November 25th 04 01:18 AM |
LeMond Croix de Fer vs Trek 2100 vs Trek 1500 | Atri I | General | 4 | November 23rd 04 06:22 PM |
FS: Trek 2100 F/F | Charles Stickle | Marketplace | 3 | August 25th 04 07:01 AM |