A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pounder seems to have missed this one



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 20th 19, 09:17 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Jester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,604
Default Pounder seems to have missed this one


https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...-news-20112019

I wonder why?

It couldn't possibly be because it involves a motorist driving on the pavement. That would be against his religion.

And it happened in Preston where all motorists are Angels.
Ads
  #2  
Old November 21st 19, 01:37 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,864
Default Pounder seems to have missed this one

On 20/11/2019 20:17, Simon Jester wrote:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...-news-20112019

I wonder why?

It couldn't possibly be because it involves a motorist driving on the pavement. That would be against his religion.

And it happened in Preston where all motorists are Angels.


It really is about time that driving up onto the footway in an attempt
to murder a victim who is on foot was made illegal, isn't it?
  #3  
Old November 21st 19, 09:19 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Jester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,604
Default Pounder seems to have missed this one

On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 12:37:18 AM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 20/11/2019 20:17, Simon Jester wrote:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...-news-20112019

I wonder why?

It couldn't possibly be because it involves a motorist driving on the pavement. That would be against his religion.

And it happened in Preston where all motorists are Angels.


It really is about time that driving up onto the footway in an attempt
to murder a victim who is on foot was made illegal, isn't it?


Is there some point you are failing to make?
  #4  
Old November 21st 19, 09:25 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,864
Default Pounder seems to have missed this one

On 21/11/2019 20:19, Simon Jester wrote:

On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 12:37:18 AM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 20/11/2019 20:17, Simon Jester wrote:


https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...-news-20112019

I wonder why?
It couldn't possibly be because it involves a motorist driving on the pavement. That would be against his religion.
And it happened in Preston where all motorists are Angels.


It really is about time that driving up onto the footway in an attempt
to murder a victim who is on foot was made illegal, isn't it?


Is there some point you are failing to make?


No, but there is *certainly* one that you are consistently and
continually failing to see, or at the very least, failing to acknowledge.

  #5  
Old November 21st 19, 09:52 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Jester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,604
Default Pounder seems to have missed this one

On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:25:02 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 21/11/2019 20:19, Simon Jester wrote:

On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 12:37:18 AM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 20/11/2019 20:17, Simon Jester wrote:


https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...-news-20112019

I wonder why?
It couldn't possibly be because it involves a motorist driving on the pavement. That would be against his religion.
And it happened in Preston where all motorists are Angels.


It really is about time that driving up onto the footway in an attempt
to murder a victim who is on foot was made illegal, isn't it?


Is there some point you are failing to make?


No,


So you admit your post was pointless, then why bother posting it?

but there is *certainly* one that you are consistently and
continually failing to see, or at the very least, failing to acknowledge.


In which case you should have no problem pointing it out since we are pointing at points.


  #6  
Old November 21st 19, 10:14 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,864
Default Pounder seems to have missed this one

On 21/11/2019 20:52, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:25:02 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 21/11/2019 20:19, Simon Jester wrote:

On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 12:37:18 AM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 20/11/2019 20:17, Simon Jester wrote:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...-news-20112019

I wonder why?
It couldn't possibly be because it involves a motorist driving on the pavement. That would be against his religion.
And it happened in Preston where all motorists are Angels.


It really is about time that driving up onto the footway in an attempt
to murder a victim who is on foot was made illegal, isn't it?


Is there some point you are failing to make?


No,


So you admit your post was pointless, then why bother posting it?


You are pathetic... that was pure kindergarten playground stuff you
tried to deploy there...

but there is *certainly* one that you are consistently and
continually failing to see, or at the very least, failing to acknowledge.


In which case you should have no problem pointing it out since we are pointing at points.


Have another read of the story.

I accept that there are parallels with several cycling cases we have
heard about recent years, notably of the "I'm not stopping - so get out
of my way" variety.
  #7  
Old November 21st 19, 11:13 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Jester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,604
Default Pounder seems to have missed this one

On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:14:26 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 21/11/2019 20:52, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:25:02 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 21/11/2019 20:19, Simon Jester wrote:

On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 12:37:18 AM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 20/11/2019 20:17, Simon Jester wrote:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...-news-20112019

I wonder why?
It couldn't possibly be because it involves a motorist driving on the pavement. That would be against his religion.
And it happened in Preston where all motorists are Angels.

It really is about time that driving up onto the footway in an attempt
to murder a victim who is on foot was made illegal, isn't it?

Is there some point you are failing to make?

No,


So you admit your post was pointless, then why bother posting it?


You are pathetic... that was pure kindergarten playground stuff you
tried to deploy there...


It seemed necessary given your 'maturity'.


but there is *certainly* one that you are consistently and
continually failing to see, or at the very least, failing to acknowledge.


In which case you should have no problem pointing it out since we are pointing at points.


Have another read of the story.

I accept that there are parallels with several cycling cases we have
heard about recent years, notably of the "I'm not stopping - so get out
of my way" variety.


Please cite these cases.



  #8  
Old November 22nd 19, 03:12 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,965
Default Pounder seems to have missed this one

On 21/11/2019 22:13, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:14:26 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:

I accept that there are parallels with several cycling cases we have
heard about recent years, notably of the "I'm not stopping - so get out
of my way" variety.


Please cite these cases.


He doesn't think it through. It takes 3 seconds to say the phrase. If
attempted in the heat of the moment it would turn into "I'm not.... oomph".
  #9  
Old November 22nd 19, 05:40 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,864
Default Pounder seems to have missed this one

On 22/11/2019 14:12, TMS320 wrote:

On 21/11/2019 22:13, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:14:26 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:


I accept that there are parallels with several cycling cases we have
heard about recent years, notably of the "I'm not stopping - so get out
of my way" variety.


Please cite these cases.


He doesn't think it through. It takes 3 seconds to say the phrase. If
attempted in the heat of the moment it would turn into "I'm not.... oomph".


You are both well aware of the cases. You are just being childish, as
per usual.
  #10  
Old November 22nd 19, 05:58 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,965
Default Pounder seems to have missed this one

On 22/11/2019 16:40, JNugent wrote:
On 22/11/2019 14:12, TMS320 wrote:

On 21/11/2019 22:13, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:14:26 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:


I accept that there are parallels with several cycling cases we have
heard about recent years, notably of the "I'm not stopping - so get out
of my way" variety.


Please cite these cases.


He doesn't think it through. It takes 3 seconds to say the phrase. If
attempted in the heat of the moment it would turn into "I'm not....
oomph".


You are both well aware of the cases. You are just being childish, as
per usual.


You raised it so it's up you to deliver.

Even if you can, what about the 100 drivers a day that run pedestrians
over. You have proof they never do it?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
One for Pounder Simon Mason[_6_] UK 1 July 2nd 19 12:18 PM
IS THIS MISTER POUNDER? Simon Jester UK 0 July 31st 18 02:10 PM
Pounder's (wet) Dream Simon Jester UK 1 May 16th 18 07:20 PM
Mr Pounder? Simon Jester UK 4 October 4th 17 07:05 PM
Dick Pounder at it again! Bill C Racing 13 July 5th 06 02:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.