cyclist holds up traffic

Weaving in and out of traffic, being a nuisance and then holds up the bus,
someone should have got out and flattened him.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/8792...dilly/?ref=rss

Mrcheerful wrote:

Weaving in and out of traffic, being a nuisance and then holds up the
bus, someone should have got out and flattened him.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/8792...ne_man_protest
_in_front_of_bus_in_Piccadilly/?ref=rss

Whilst agreeing that this cyclist appears to have acted like a ****,
why do you keep posting articles like this?

There are far more examples of drivers behaving like ****s every day,
but I know of few cyclists (Doug excepted) who would be childish enough
to continually post such polarised views to a car newsgroup.

You don't act like a **** on the driving groups I also know you from,
indeed you're known for being helpful, so why carry on so childishly
here?

--
Paul - xxx

Paul - xxx wrote:
Mrcheerful wrote:

Weaving in and out of traffic, being a nuisance and then holds up the
bus, someone should have got out and flattened him.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/8792...ne_man_protest
_in_front_of_bus_in_Piccadilly/?ref=rss

Whilst agreeing that this cyclist appears to have acted like a ****,
why do you keep posting articles like this?

There are far more examples of drivers behaving like ****s every day,
but I know of few cyclists (Doug excepted) who would be childish
enough to continually post such polarised views to a car newsgroup.

You don't act like a **** on the driving groups I also know you from,
indeed you're known for being helpful, so why carry on so childishly
here?

only to wind up Doug, and the other rabid ones.

On Jan 17, 10:26*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Paul - xxx wrote:
Mrcheerful wrote:

Weaving in and out of traffic, being a nuisance and then holds up the
bus, someone should have got out and flattened him.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/8792...ne_man_protest
_in_front_of_bus_in_Piccadilly/?ref=rss

Whilst agreeing that this cyclist appears to have acted like a ****,
why do you keep posting articles like this?

There are far more examples of drivers behaving like ****s every day,
but I know of few cyclists (Doug excepted) who would be childish
enough to continually post such polarised views to a car newsgroup.

You don't act like a **** on the driving groups I also know you from,
indeed you're known for being helpful, so why carry on so childishly
here?

only to wind up Doug, and the other rabid ones.

Seems like a good reason to me.

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:50:38 -0000, "Mrcheerful"
wrote:

Weaving in and out of traffic, being a nuisance and then holds up the bus,
someone should have got out and flattened him.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/8792...dilly/?ref=rss



Read the comments:

JzG, York says...

I am fed up with cyclists thinking that they own the roads (and the
pavements). There is a need for them to be registered in some way and
to have a visible ID number so that they can be traced in
circumstances like this.


Is that feasible?

In article ,
says...

Weaving in and out of traffic, being a nuisance and then holds up the bus,
someone should have got out and flattened him.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/8792...dilly/?ref=rss

I thought Doug lived in London, and that he only took direct action
against cars (buses are somehow much "safer" than cars, and
coincidentally fit in much more with the socialist "ideal")?

That does however get me wondering what CM do when a bus appears and
gets stuck behind the cars they're "corking". Does that make them
instantly disperse? In that case, would it be worth clubbing together
to hire a bus each month to follow the self-righteous interfering idiots
around?

In article ,
says...

JzG, York says...

For the avoidance of doubt that was nothing to do with me. (Not that
Chapman "owns" those three letters of course, but it's almost certainly
another Chapman-despiser who's made that post...it's certainly far too
sensible to be the man himself!)

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:50:38 +0000, Mrcheerful wrote:

Weaving in and out of traffic, being a nuisance and then holds up the
bus, someone should have got out and flattened him.

There is absolutely no excuse for someone to initiate violence against
anyone else.


http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/
news/8792031.Cyclist_stages_one_man_protest_in_front_of _bus_in_Piccadilly/?
ref=rss





--
67.4% of statistics are made up.

In article , says...

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:50:38 +0000, Mrcheerful wrote:

Weaving in and out of traffic, being a nuisance and then holds up the
bus, someone should have got out and flattened him.

There is absolutely no excuse for someone to initiate violence against
anyone else.

So you would equally condemn a cyclist who initiated violence against a
motorist who had just (supposedly) nearly killed him with his driving?

I do agree with what you say though, and I don't think there should be
any exceptions for corporal (or capital) punishment. Or for the
continued (ab)use of road "safety" measures where there is hard evidence
that they actually increase KSIs.