|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bike-Eating Tree Caught on Film!
in rec.bicycles.misc
On Sun, 27 May 2007 13:45:45 GMT, "rms" wrote: Trees do find bikes tasty, proof he http://www.neatorama.com/2007/05/25/...aten-by-a-tree rms If it can't be ridden, is it still a bike? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bike-Eating Tree Caught on Film!
On Mon, 28 May 2007 08:39:03 +1000, Aeek wrote:
If it can't be ridden, is it still a bike? Someone I showed that pic to said that it must be a fake, because trees don't hoist objects into the air when they grow around them. Does anyone know whether that's true? -- Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bike-Eating Tree Caught on Film!
Michael Warner Wrote: On Mon, 28 May 2007 08:39:03 +1000, Aeek wrote: If it can't be ridden, is it still a bike? Someone I showed that pic to said that it must be a fake, because trees don't hoist objects into the air when they grow around them. Does anyone know whether that's true? -- Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw there's a lot of comment on neatorama about this bike and the tree, consensus is, its not a fake...looks like the bike was stuck up in a fork, (even chained there) and as the tree grew it enveloped the bike frame into its bark then into its structure around the fork...40 to 50 years of growth... -- rooman |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bike-Eating Tree Caught on Film!
Michael Warner wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 08:39:03 +1000, Aeek wrote: If it can't be ridden, is it still a bike? Someone I showed that pic to said that it must be a fake, because trees don't hoist objects into the air when they grow around them. Does anyone know whether that's true? Trees might not hoist things into the air but people certainly can! It is plausible, especially if it was lifted into the tree by someone, say about 50 years ago. There's an additional link from that page which has additional photos which support the idea that it's not a fake: http://tinyurl.com/23pjsl -- Bean Remove "yourfinger" before replying |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bike-Eating Tree Caught on Film!
rooman wrote:
Michael Warner Wrote: On Mon, 28 May 2007 08:39:03 +1000, Aeek wrote: If it can't be ridden, is it still a bike? Someone I showed that pic to said that it must be a fake, because trees don't hoist objects into the air when they grow around them. Does anyone know whether that's true? -- Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw there's a lot of comment on neatorama about this bike and the tree, consensus is, its not a fake...looks like the bike was stuck up in a fork, (even chained there) and as the tree grew it enveloped the bike frame into its bark then into its structure around the fork...40 to 50 years of growth... I have a tree in my garden that has wrapped itself round a steel post that was used to hold it up when it was a sapling (I presume), it's now some 15' off the ground, much higher than it was when I bought the block some 15 years ago. -- Karen If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to be a horrible warning.' Catherine Aird |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bike-Eating Tree Caught on Film!
Duracell Bunny wrote:
Michael Warner Wrote: Someone I showed that pic to said that it must be a fake, because trees don't hoist objects into the air when they grow around them. Does anyone know whether that's true? I have a tree in my garden that has wrapped itself round a steel post that was used to hold it up when it was a sapling (I presume), it's now some 15' off the ground, much higher than it was when I bought the block some 15 years ago. That's very interesting. Most trees grow up from the top, and just get wider at the bottom. Theo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bike-Eating Tree Caught on Film!
On reading this thread I initially thought it might be another bike
eating tree in Scotland that was also being talked about a few weeks ago on uk.rec.cycling - http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/INFD-6U8J98 I've seen this one myself so it's definitely not fake (though perhaps not as impressive as the other one). Graeme |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bike-Eating Tree Caught on Film!
"Theo Bekkers" wrote in message ... Duracell Bunny wrote: Michael Warner Wrote: Someone I showed that pic to said that it must be a fake, because trees don't hoist objects into the air when they grow around them. Does anyone know whether that's true? I have a tree in my garden that has wrapped itself round a steel post that was used to hold it up when it was a sapling (I presume), it's now some 15' off the ground, much higher than it was when I bought the block some 15 years ago. That's very interesting. Most trees grow up from the top, and just get wider at the bottom. Theo That doesn't sound right. How do trees wind up with substantial amounts (metres in some cases) of straight trunk prior to the first branch then? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bike-Eating Tree Caught on Film!
Resound wrote:
"Theo Bekkers" wrote Duracell Bunny wrote: I have a tree in my garden that has wrapped itself round a steel post that was used to hold it up when it was a sapling (I presume), it's now some 15' off the ground, much higher than it was when I bought the block some 15 years ago. That's very interesting. Most trees grow up from the top, and just get wider at the bottom. That doesn't sound right. How do trees wind up with substantial amounts (metres in some cases) of straight trunk prior to the first branch then? I don't know what happens to the lower branches. Maybe some trees shed them and some don't. I know that in a dense forest the lower branches die and fall off due to lack of sunshine for their leaves. We have about ten Golden Ambers in our driveway which are now at four to five metres. I started trimming the lower branches last year, otherwise they would be lying on the ground. I've noticed that the gums in my backyard have long clear trunks but the same tree in my front yard with lots of space has branches down to ground level. See below for explanation of a very common misconception. http://www.cnr.vt.edu/dendro/forsite/howdoes.htm Trees grow in height as a result of meristems that are located at their branch tips. These meristems are called apical meristems. Roots also expand through the soil by growing at their tips as a result of apical meristems. All buds that you see on a tree contain apical meristems. Trunk diameter growth occurs as a result of another meristem already mentioned called the vascular cambium. The vascular cambium produces new xylem and phloem each year and as a result the trunk, branches and roots continue to increase in diameter. Have you ever seen a fence wire or board grown into a tree? That is the result of the vascular cambium. The fence wire or board doesn't rise into the air because height growth doesn't occur out of the ground, it only occurs from the branch tips. picture of fence board in tree left out Now for a little demonstration on how a branch grows. Notice that the buds grow out - the whole twig doesn't extend. This is the reason why a nail pounded into a tree trunk never changes height. New growth is added to the tips. The only other way a tree grows is in diameter. Cheers. Theo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bike-Eating Tree Caught on Film! | rms[_2_] | General | 4 | May 30th 07 06:12 PM |
Going Up In The Tree With The Bike . | Medhooza | UK | 1 | April 21st 07 10:22 PM |
Going Up In The Tree With The Bike . | Medhooza | General | 0 | April 21st 07 07:45 PM |
Icebiking in New Mexico Caught on Film! | rms | General | 4 | January 23rd 07 02:31 PM |
Puncture Fairy Caught on Film? | Mark Thompson | UK | 9 | April 21st 05 10:14 AM |