|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Continous variable transmission???
Jasper Janssen writes:
Not a true CVT as they assert since the blades would span integral quantities of links, but an interesting approach to hyper selection ratios: http://www.andersoncvt.com/ It is a true CVT. There is no mechanism that forces the chain links and the cones into any sort of engagement with the chain. It is, in fact, pretty close to how automotive CVTs are constructed. The first DAF CVTs used a belt of some kind on the cones, and torque and power was limited by the belt. Modern automotive CVTs on the DAF principle use chains like this one does. From what i see in the picture is that the cones have slats with a ridge in their center that engages notches in the chain. These are shaped to settle into position somewhere in the rotation so that only one slat is synchronous. As far as I can see, this will not work and it is not continuous, the chain making digital adjustments to the ribs on the cone. The DAF CVT uses friction between the faces of V-pulleys to drive its chain that does not operate as a chain with engagement features but rather as a steel V-belt. Jobst Brandt |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Continous variable transmission???
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:48:17 +0100, "Tomek Li"
wrote: Over the years I got used to think that such a transmission would be no more than another incarnation of perpetuum mobile. But recently I learned that some quite serious people got on the task, with interesting results. The links below I copy from uk.rec.cycling See: http://www.fallbrooktech.com/NuVinci.asp http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?sect...le&storyid=841 http://www.californiabicycleracing.o...interbike.html So, what do you think? For a hub as fat as a Rohloff (both in diameter and likely in weight), they're awfully sparse in their hard information about actual gear ranges, real torque capacity, and actual cost of manufacture. It's just a prototype at this point, really. Based on what I see, though, I wouldn't invest any of my own funds in that company. I don't see any reason to believe that the product will succeed in this marketplace; it's not filling a need that isn't already well-served by mature, inexpensive and reliable technologies. -- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Continous variable transmission???
In article ,
Werehatrack wrote: http://www.fallbrooktech.com/NuVinci.asp http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?sect...le&storyid=841 http://www.californiabicycleracing.o...interbike.html So, what do you think? For a hub as fat as a Rohloff (both in diameter and likely in weight), they're awfully sparse in their hard information about actual gear ranges, real torque capacity, and actual cost of manufacture. It's just a prototype at this point, really. Based on what I see, though, I wouldn't invest any of my own funds in that company. I don't see any reason to believe that the product will succeed in this marketplace; it's not filling a need that isn't already well-served by mature, inexpensive and reliable technologies. Traditionally, friction drives with metal-metal contact have had some rather touchy lubrication requirements. As in a small amount of water in the system would cause massive amounts of damage in a big hurry, and an oil change would be extremely expensive. A toroid-style CVT I got to see up close required oil costing right around $45/qt. And it needed a few gallons. It was a big unit running a conveyor. So if they did produce this hub in large quantities they'd probably get a lot of complaints from people who either don't change the lube when needed, put in the wrong stuff, or got a seal leak they didn't discover until total failure. -- B.B. --I am not a goat! thegoat4 at airmail dot net |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Continous variable transmission???
Tomek Li wrote:
Over the years I got used to think that such a transmission would be no more than another incarnation of perpetuum mobile. But recently I learned that some quite serious people got on the task, with interesting results. The links below I copy from uk.rec.cycling See: http://www.fallbrooktech.com/NuVinci.asp http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?sect...le&storyid=841 http://www.californiabicycleracing.o...interbike.html So, what do you think? I like single speed. Nikolas Ojala Tampere, Finland -- http://www.iki.fi/no Static truth is dead truth and only dead truth can be held as a theory. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Continous variable transmission???
peterlip wrote:
It'll be interesting to see how efficient a CVT can be. From memory, the current gear with derailer configuration is around 95-97% efficient, ie only 3-5% of your power is lost. The test data published in Wilson's _Bicycling Science_ show derailleur drivetrain efficiencies from the high 80s to the high 90s, depending on choice of gears and cleanliness of components. Even the clean, new example displayed pretty close to 90% efficiency in some gears. It seems that many folks develop an exaggerated impression of a derailleur drivetrain's efficiency, simply because that's the most prevalent design. I think it's prevalence has more to do with the fact that it's considerably cheaper to manufacture than other kinds of bicycle transmissions. Internal gear hubs do not impose an automatic efficiency penalty in all circumstances, but any kind of CVT probably would. Chalo Colina |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Continous variable transmission???
Tomek Li writes:
Over the years I got used to think that such a transmission would be no more than another incarnation of perpetuo mobile. But recently I learned that some quite serious people got on the task, with interesting results. The links below are copied from uk.rec.cycling http://www.fallbrooktech.com/NuVinci.asp http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?sect...le&storyid=841 http://www.californiabicycleracing.o...interbike.html So, what do you think? This is a friction drive that's been around for a long time without finding a good home. Its spherical idler has a bad mechanical advantage at both ends of its limited ratio range, besides being heavier than most chain or planetary transmissions. I guess they tossed in the towel, so to speak, when they found no positive engagement gearing to accomplish the impossible. Naming it after the village in Tuscany where the great Leonardo lived doesn't make it new. http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/continuous.html Jobst Brandt |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Continous variable transmission???
Does your 80-90% figure come from the 3rd edition? Page 300 of the second
edition says "The efficiencies of present transmissions using chains and derailleurs or hub gears are in the high nineties..." -- Carl "Chalo" wrote in message oups.com... peterlip wrote: It'll be interesting to see how efficient a CVT can be. From memory, the current gear with derailer configuration is around 95-97% efficient, ie only 3-5% of your power is lost. The test data published in Wilson's _Bicycling Science_ show derailleur drivetrain efficiencies from the high 80s to the high 90s, depending on choice of gears and cleanliness of components. Even the clean, new example displayed pretty close to 90% efficiency in some gears. It seems that many folks develop an exaggerated impression of a derailleur drivetrain's efficiency, simply because that's the most prevalent design. I think it's prevalence has more to do with the fact that it's considerably cheaper to manufacture than other kinds of bicycle transmissions. Internal gear hubs do not impose an automatic efficiency penalty in all circumstances, but any kind of CVT probably would. Chalo Colina |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New bicycle idea | Bob Marley | General | 49 | October 7th 04 05:20 AM |
Nupace continuously variable transmission internal gear hub | meb | Techniques | 4 | September 28th 04 05:10 AM |
Nupace continuously variable transmission internal gear hub | meb | Techniques | 2 | September 28th 04 12:00 AM |
"Continuously variable" electric transmission | Richard Schumacher | General | 16 | January 6th 04 01:33 AM |
"Continuously variable" electric transmission | Richard Schumacher | Techniques | 17 | December 22nd 03 05:46 PM |