|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Distribution of frame sizes?
writes:
Hi Everyone, So my question is, which percentage of the fleet should each size be? The bikes I'm looking at come in 2cm increments (c-c): 60, 58, 56, 54, 52, 50, 48. For various reasons we are not going with S, M, L compact style frames. Assuming that most people buy roughly the correct size of bike, and assuming that women & men sell used bikes at roughly the same rate, the distribution of used bikes being sold should roughly match the distribution of new bikes being bought. Therefore, all the information that you need is contained at the histogram (for road bikes, both sexes) at this URL location : http://sporting-goods.search.ebay.co...1QQsacatZ98084 I'll just quote the histogram (on the left side of the screen, about 1/4 of the way down the page) that is currently being reported : Frame Size 44-45 cm (7) 46-47 cm (28) 48-49 cm (44) 50-51 cm (79) 52-53 cm (99) 54-55 cm (146) 56-57 cm (135) 58-59 cm (115) 60-61 cm (63) 62-63 cm (24) 64-65 cm (11) XS (7) S (53) M (234) L (245) XL (31) Other (62) - Don Gillies San Diego, CA |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Distribution of frame sizes?
Why not just survey the spin class participants?
There's also no inherent tradeoff between compact geometry and fit. Assuming a decent number of sizes to choose from, (i.e. more than just S,M,L) you can fit people just as well, and new riders might feel more comfortable with more standover. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Distribution of frame sizes?
Assuming half men and half women renters, you will need
3 60cm, 10 58cm, 12 56cm, 12 54cm, 10 52cm 3 50cm or 2 50cm and 1 48cm Something went wrong with at least the women's numbers; we sell a very large qty of 47cm & 51cm Trek WSD (Women Specific Design) models, for example. And keep in mind that you can't assume similar styles of bikes will fit both men & women equally; a large number of women definitely fit WSD-style bikes (typically with shorter top tubes) better. I'm not sure why you need to guess at this; your client owns a health club for goodness sake, what's so tough about doing a survey of their heights? Seems like profiling height, weight & sex would be a standard thing to do. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com "Bob Wheeler" wrote in message ... Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote: wrote: Hi Everyone, Perhaps someone who runs a bike store or has other relevant experience can help me out here. Someone I know who owns a health club is contemplating buying a fleet of bikes to rent/loan to spinning folks for organized rides. I am tentatively in charge of getting the bikes. So my question is, which percentage of the fleet should each size be? The bikes I'm looking at come in 2cm increments (c-c): 60, 58, 56, 54, 52, 50, 48. For various reasons we are not going with S, M, L compact style frames. So for a fleet of 50 bikes, how many of each size?? What is the bike size curve for the population of road riders? Thanks! Well of course, most men ride around a 56cm-58cm or so, most women 52-50cm or so..most should be there. A couple largest an smallest, most in the moiddle, of course. 20-56cm 10-52cm 5-58 3-60 5-50 3-48 6-54 or something like that. 54s for shortish men, tallish women. Joseph The statistics on leg length give a mean of 96cm for a male 20yr or older. The SD is about 4.5cm. This isn't stand over height but the sum of knee height and upper leg length. If you scale this to an average male frame of 57cm, then the SD becomes about 1.7cm. These measurements follow a normal distribution, so for men you will need about 12% 60cm, 38% 58cm, 38% 56cm, 10% 54cm, and 2% 52cm. Assuming an average of 53cm for women, you will need about 2% 58cm, 10% 56cm, 38% 54cm, 38% 52cm, 10% 51cm and 2% 50cm. Assuming half men and half women renters, you will need 3 60cm, 10 58cm, 12 56cm, 12 54cm, 10 52cm 3 50cm or 2 50cm and 1 48cm The problem, of course, is what is the ratio of men to women. Guess wrong and you will have mud on your face. -- Bob Wheeler --- http://www.bobwheeler.com/ ECHIP, Inc. --- Randomness comes in bunches. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Distribution of frame sizes?
Dave wrote: Why not just survey the spin class participants? There's also no inherent tradeoff between compact geometry and fit. Assuming a decent number of sizes to choose from, (i.e. more than just S,M,L) you can fit people just as well, and new riders might feel more comfortable with more standover. This may be true, but the choice of bikes also has a lot to do with "marketing" future sales, and other sponsorship deals, etc. The club has a tie-in with a shop that focuses on a particular brand, as well as sposors a team which uses this brand. And part of their pitch is "other clubs force everyone onto S, M, L bikes, while we take the time to find a bike that fits, blah, blah, blah" Joseph |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Distribution of frame sizes?
Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: Assuming half men and half women renters, you will need 3 60cm, 10 58cm, 12 56cm, 12 54cm, 10 52cm 3 50cm or 2 50cm and 1 48cm Something went wrong with at least the women's numbers; we sell a very large qty of 47cm & 51cm Trek WSD (Women Specific Design) models, for example. And keep in mind that you can't assume similar styles of bikes will fit both men & women equally; a large number of women definitely fit WSD-style bikes (typically with shorter top tubes) better. I'm not sure why you need to guess at this; your client owns a health club for goodness sake, what's so tough about doing a survey of their heights? Seems like profiling height, weight & sex would be a standard thing to do. Having an appropriate number of WSD bikes is important. Just a thought, but perhaps you sell a large number of these WSD bikes because you are known to carry them and known to give good service to women who need them? We do have some info on the club members but this project will include many more folks than just the folks in the club. Spouses, etc, as well as members of clubs in the same franchise but owned by others. In is not practical to get accurate info that way. Assuming I can get enough info on the heights of the folks involved, what do you suppose is a good height:inseam ratio to guess male inseam from known height? Female? I've been using .48 for males which is based on a slightly modified version of myself. Joseph |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Distribution of frame sizes?
Donald Gillies wrote: writes: Hi Everyone, So my question is, which percentage of the fleet should each size be? The bikes I'm looking at come in 2cm increments (c-c): 60, 58, 56, 54, 52, 50, 48. For various reasons we are not going with S, M, L compact style frames. Assuming that most people buy roughly the correct size of bike, and assuming that women & men sell used bikes at roughly the same rate, the distribution of used bikes being sold should roughly match the distribution of new bikes being bought. Therefore, all the information that you need is contained at the histogram (for road bikes, both sexes) at this URL location : http://sporting-goods.search.ebay.co...1QQsacatZ98084 I'll just quote the histogram (on the left side of the screen, about 1/4 of the way down the page) that is currently being reported : Frame Size 44-45 cm (7) 46-47 cm (28) 48-49 cm (44) 50-51 cm (79) 52-53 cm (99) 54-55 cm (146) 56-57 cm (135) 58-59 cm (115) 60-61 cm (63) 62-63 cm (24) 64-65 cm (11) XS (7) S (53) M (234) L (245) XL (31) Other (62) - Don Gillies San Diego, CA That is very interesting. It is fun seeing all the info people are finding. This may be the most useful batch of info so far. But here is a theory: The upper and lower ends may be exagerated. Since the extreme ends of the curve will always have a smaller pool of local buyers, perhaps folks with really small bikes or really big bikes will be more likely to try to sell on ebay to reach a larger market. Likewise with buyers. I live in the boonies and there are about 30 active members of my bicycle club. If I had some 56cm fames to sell, I'm sure I could sell them to one of them no problem. But I have a 59 for sale, and there is only one other guy who rides a 59, and he doesn't want it. So I'll try ebay. Just a theory, but the info looks good. Thanks! Joseph |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Distribution of frame sizes?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Distribution of frame sizes?
Something went wrong with at least the women's numbers; we sell a very
large qty of 47cm & 51cm Trek WSD (Women Specific Design) models, for example. And keep in mind that you can't assume similar styles of bikes will fit both men & women equally; a large number of women definitely fit WSD-style bikes (typically with shorter top tubes) better. I'm not sure why you need to guess at this; your client owns a health club for goodness sake, what's so tough about doing a survey of their heights? Seems like profiling height, weight & sex would be a standard thing to do. Having an appropriate number of WSD bikes is important. Just a thought, but perhaps you sell a large number of these WSD bikes because you are known to carry them and known to give good service to women who need them? That's part of it, sure, but keep in mind that, what you're doing may bring out more women wanting to participate than men. Women often gravitate towards things that are perceived as "safe" ways to exercise, and riding in groups is seen as safer than riding on their own... plus cycling can be a very social activity, more so than, say, running). This may be a way to get a lot more women interested in joining the club. We do have some info on the club members but this project will include many more folks than just the folks in the club. Spouses, etc, as well as members of clubs in the same franchise but owned by others. In is not practical to get accurate info that way. However, if your club is large enough (and given the number of bikes you're talking about, it sounds like it is), you still may get a fairly representative sampling by checking out the needs of your current membership. At the very least this should serve as a safety check for any numbers you might derive from formulas. Assuming I can get enough info on the heights of the folks involved, what do you suppose is a good height:inseam ratio to guess male inseam from known height? Female? I've been using .48 for males which is based on a slightly modified version of myself. Y'know, having been in business for 25+ years, and having always seen proper fit as a big thing, you'd think I would have kept track of something as simple as "Customers of "x" height, on average, have purchased bikes of "y" size. But we haven't. We have fit charts that we use (New England Cycling Academy) and don't pay much attention to the connection between height and frame size. Having said that, 9 times out of 10 I can look at someone and come up with what frame size they're going to take, when they're standing (not when on a bike). I can even guess pretty well where the stem's going to be too, just by noting how much of the person are legs vs arms vs torso. But getting back to your dilemma- have you thought about calling up a bike rental company, perhaps a travel company, and see how their size runs skew? Keep in mind that, no matter how hard you try, you'll get it wrong. What that means to me is that it makes sense to leave a fair amount of room to fine-tune things down the road, so don't buy more than, say, 60% initially. Start your program a bit slower than you might have been thinking of doing, and any errors will be far less costly (because you can correct them with as-yet-unpurchased inventory). --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com wrote in message ups.com... Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: Assuming half men and half women renters, you will need 3 60cm, 10 58cm, 12 56cm, 12 54cm, 10 52cm 3 50cm or 2 50cm and 1 48cm Something went wrong with at least the women's numbers; we sell a very large qty of 47cm & 51cm Trek WSD (Women Specific Design) models, for example. And keep in mind that you can't assume similar styles of bikes will fit both men & women equally; a large number of women definitely fit WSD-style bikes (typically with shorter top tubes) better. I'm not sure why you need to guess at this; your client owns a health club for goodness sake, what's so tough about doing a survey of their heights? Seems like profiling height, weight & sex would be a standard thing to do. Having an appropriate number of WSD bikes is important. Just a thought, but perhaps you sell a large number of these WSD bikes because you are known to carry them and known to give good service to women who need them? We do have some info on the club members but this project will include many more folks than just the folks in the club. Spouses, etc, as well as members of clubs in the same franchise but owned by others. In is not practical to get accurate info that way. Assuming I can get enough info on the heights of the folks involved, what do you suppose is a good height:inseam ratio to guess male inseam from known height? Female? I've been using .48 for males which is based on a slightly modified version of myself. Joseph |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Distribution of frame sizes?
Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: Something went wrong with at least the women's numbers; we sell a very large qty of 47cm & 51cm Trek WSD (Women Specific Design) models, for example. And keep in mind that you can't assume similar styles of bikes will fit both men & women equally; a large number of women definitely fit WSD-style bikes (typically with shorter top tubes) better. I'm not sure why you need to guess at this; your client owns a health club for goodness sake, what's so tough about doing a survey of their heights? Seems like profiling height, weight & sex would be a standard thing to do. Having an appropriate number of WSD bikes is important. Just a thought, but perhaps you sell a large number of these WSD bikes because you are known to carry them and known to give good service to women who need them? That's part of it, sure, but keep in mind that, what you're doing may bring out more women wanting to participate than men. Women often gravitate towards things that are perceived as "safe" ways to exercise, and riding in groups is seen as safer than riding on their own... plus cycling can be a very social activity, more so than, say, running). This may be a way to get a lot more women interested in joining the club. Getting folks out on the road who might not feel comfortable doing it on their own, oor who might not know where to start, or just need akick in the pants is what this is all about. I, as well as all others involved think we will get a large turn out of women as well. We do have some info on the club members but this project will include many more folks than just the folks in the club. Spouses, etc, as well as members of clubs in the same franchise but owned by others. In is not practical to get accurate info that way. However, if your club is large enough (and given the number of bikes you're talking about, it sounds like it is), you still may get a fairly representative sampling by checking out the needs of your current membership. At the very least this should serve as a safety check for any numbers you might derive from formulas. I'll try to get some actual nubers, but it's a whole turf-war thing with nagging certain uncooperatvie people that is a can of worms I don't want to open. Assuming I can get enough info on the heights of the folks involved, what do you suppose is a good height:inseam ratio to guess male inseam from known height? Female? I've been using .48 for males which is based on a slightly modified version of myself. Y'know, having been in business for 25+ years, and having always seen proper fit as a big thing, you'd think I would have kept track of something as simple as "Customers of "x" height, on average, have purchased bikes of "y" size. But we haven't. We have fit charts that we use (New England Cycling Academy) and don't pay much attention to the connection between height and frame size. Having said that, 9 times out of 10 I can look at someone and come up with what frame size they're going to take, when they're standing (not when on a bike). I can even guess pretty well where the stem's going to be too, just by noting how much of the person are legs vs arms vs torso. But getting back to your dilemma- have you thought about calling up a bike rental company, perhaps a travel company, and see how their size runs skew? The only folks I have to call are the competition! For sales number I have the distributors, but they don't know the breakdown by sex, and may have ulterior motives in any number they report. Keep in mind that, no matter how hard you try, you'll get it wrong. What that means to me is that it makes sense to leave a fair amount of room to fine-tune things down the road, so don't buy more than, say, 60% initially. Start your program a bit slower than you might have been thinking of doing, and any errors will be far less costly (because you can correct them with as-yet-unpurchased inventory). That's why we are only getting 50 to start! Thanks for the input! Joseph --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com wrote in message ups.com... Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: Assuming half men and half women renters, you will need 3 60cm, 10 58cm, 12 56cm, 12 54cm, 10 52cm 3 50cm or 2 50cm and 1 48cm Something went wrong with at least the women's numbers; we sell a very large qty of 47cm & 51cm Trek WSD (Women Specific Design) models, for example. And keep in mind that you can't assume similar styles of bikes will fit both men & women equally; a large number of women definitely fit WSD-style bikes (typically with shorter top tubes) better. I'm not sure why you need to guess at this; your client owns a health club for goodness sake, what's so tough about doing a survey of their heights? Seems like profiling height, weight & sex would be a standard thing to do. Having an appropriate number of WSD bikes is important. Just a thought, but perhaps you sell a large number of these WSD bikes because you are known to carry them and known to give good service to women who need them? We do have some info on the club members but this project will include many more folks than just the folks in the club. Spouses, etc, as well as members of clubs in the same franchise but owned by others. In is not practical to get accurate info that way. Assuming I can get enough info on the heights of the folks involved, what do you suppose is a good height:inseam ratio to guess male inseam from known height? Female? I've been using .48 for males which is based on a slightly modified version of myself. Joseph |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 58cm Trek or 57cm Lemond etc.. | oclvframe | Marketplace | 1 | October 24th 05 06:31 PM |
FS: NOS Colnagos and never ridden 50th Anniversary Schwinn Paramount | Frank | Marketplace | 0 | January 6th 05 06:45 AM |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |
FS: 63cm Italian road/touring frame, 1980's, BEAUTIFUL!! | ccrider | Marketplace | 1 | March 11th 04 01:00 PM |
Dent in frame | Neil Guthrie | Mountain Biking | 6 | July 22nd 03 05:06 PM |