|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Graphic for muscle recruitment comparing standing/sitting?
Anyone have a link to any graphics or info about the detailed muscle
differences between riding while sitting or standing? I googled this and find many mentions of the muscle use being "different" but no details. It might even be using much the same muscles but with different intensities in different locations. A graphic could use different colors to show different intensities. I've seen these graphics showing the muscle use for activities, so I'm thinking there's something out there comparing sitting/standing. Thanks, JP |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Graphic for muscle recruitment comparing standing/sitting?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Graphic for muscle recruitment comparing standing/sitting?
wrote: wrote: Anyone have a link to any graphics or info about the detailed muscle differences between riding while sitting or standing? I googled this and find many mentions of the muscle use being "different" but no details. It might even be using much the same muscles but with different intensities in different locations. A graphic could use different colors to show different intensities. I've seen these graphics showing the muscle use for activities, so I'm thinking there's something out there comparing sitting/standing. Thanks, JP Dear Jeff, It's not quite what you want, but Analytic Cycling has a calculator with hip, thigh, and shin lengths in relation to the bottom bracket, with a graphic: http://www.analyticcycling.com/Pedal...edal_Page.html Scroll down on the left-hand window for the rider diagram. Cheers, Carl Fogel That is a lot more than I expected to be available! (Is "googled" a verb now?) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Graphic for muscle recruitment comparing standing/sitting?
On 13 Jun 2006 16:40:20 -0700, "Chris M"
wrote: wrote: wrote: Anyone have a link to any graphics or info about the detailed muscle differences between riding while sitting or standing? I googled this and find many mentions of the muscle use being "different" but no details. It might even be using much the same muscles but with different intensities in different locations. A graphic could use different colors to show different intensities. I've seen these graphics showing the muscle use for activities, so I'm thinking there's something out there comparing sitting/standing. Thanks, JP Dear Jeff, It's not quite what you want, but Analytic Cycling has a calculator with hip, thigh, and shin lengths in relation to the bottom bracket, with a graphic: http://www.analyticcycling.com/Pedal...edal_Page.html Scroll down on the left-hand window for the rider diagram. Cheers, Carl Fogel That is a lot more than I expected to be available! (Is "googled" a verb now?) Dear Chris, When I googled for "googled," I found only 6 million hits: http://www.google.com/search?as_q=go...s=&safe=images People often think that dictionaries and grammarians create language, instead of the other way around. This theory might honor Dr. Johnson, but it leaves English in the era before him in the condition of the people described by Bierce as: "PRE-ADAMITE, n. One of an experimental and apparently unsatisfactory race that antedated Creation and lived under conditions not easily conceived. Melsius believed them to have inhabited "the Void" and to have been something intermediate between fishes and birds. Little its known of them beyond the fact that they supplied Cain with a wife and theologians with a controversy." Shakespeare [1] decided that he liked the way "incarnadine" sounded, even though it wasn't a word until he thought of it: "Will all great Neptune's ocean wash this blood Clean from my hand? No, this my hand will rather The multitudinous seas incarnadine, Making the green one red." And if Heminges and Condell [2] hadn't scraped the First Folio together years later in 1623 with the only version that we have of "Macbeth," we never would have had the word "incarnadine." See the last paragraph he http://www.esmerel.com/circle/wordlore/gruntled.html It's "disgruntling" to multitudinous "editors." If google ain't a verb, it can pinch-hit until we find one. Cheers, Carl Fogaile [1] Spelt Schaksper, Schakesper, Schakespeyr, Shagspere, Shaxper, Shaxpere, Shaxpeare, Shaxsper, Shaxspere, Shaxespere, Shakepere, Shakepear, Shakspeere, Shackspeare, Shackespeare, Shackespere, Shakspeyr, Shakesper, Shakespere, Shakeseper, Shakyspere, Shakespire, Shakespeire, Shakespear, Shakaspeare. [2] Spelled Hemynges, Heming, Hemings, Heminge, Cundell, Condel, Cundaile, Condell, etc. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Graphic for muscle recruitment comparing standing/sitting?
wrote:
wrote: Anyone have a link to any graphics or info about the detailed muscle differences between riding while sitting or standing? I googled this and find many mentions of the muscle use being "different" but no details. It might even be using much the same muscles but with different intensities in different locations. A graphic could use different colors to show different intensities. I've seen these graphics showing the muscle use for activities, so I'm thinking there's something out there comparing sitting/standing. Thanks, JP Dear Jeff, It's not quite what you want, but Analytic Cycling has a calculator with hip, thigh, and shin lengths in relation to the bottom bracket, with a graphic: http://www.analyticcycling.com/Pedal...edal_Page.html Scroll down on the left-hand window for the rider diagram. Cool. Thanks. Yeah, no muscles, but it shows how forces change with rider position. Interesting. I'm slow enough that I don't understand the whole diagram. I see how the downstroke forces are represented but don't understand the "short" forces going "inside" the circle for the upstroke. Anyone have an explanation? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|