OFF TOPIC FUN - The TROLL, Rear-ended

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
Little Meow wrote:
"Edward Dolan" wrote in
news:R4WdnRM7No72lXHanZ2dnUVZ_oSunZ2d@prairiewave. com: [...]
I will call her

I'm not going to date you.

I recommend the carbon 14 method for dating Ed Dolan.

McCain and Ed Dolan are going whip young B. Hussein O.'s ass if he is the
Dem nominee. McCain can have Hussein and I will take on the good Rev.
Wright, a man whom I really understand. As he puts it so eloquently, "God
Damn America"!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
[...]
You have aptly demonstrated that you are a pathological egomaniac who
will not be encumbered or restrained by social mores. The only issue
I have with that is when you make your problem my problem and now you
have. Not only have I showed my wife my posts, but I have showed here
your replies and I am at the moment doing my utmost to persuade her
that I should give you another chance before initiating a lawsuit and
this is from a woman who is beginning her internship as a therapist.
From that, you can assume that you that it was unwise to refer to her
husband as a pederast or to refer to her as fat and ugly. Now I could
care less if you call me an asshole. I'm OK with that and write that
off as just an opinion. I'll even let your miserabel attempt to
provoke me with the fat and ugly remark regarding my wife, but should
you persist with charges of sodomy or pederasty ... well, lets just
say that you have been fairly forewarned.

You have been warned to stay off the sexual innuendo. If you don't, I will
go after your wife, your dog and whatever else you value. You are a whining
piece of ****, no better than Ed Gin - just another Chicago asshole!

Now go **** yourself and get off of ARBR, you whining piece of ****!

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
"I have not used any language on ARBR that I do not see and hear every
night on the TV
and radio." Another Dolan prevarication.

On Mar 27, 11:57 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...]

No worries there as that would be assult with a DEAD weapon, besides
he likes boys particulalry one named Vandeman.

Why is McNamara always referencing boys. He must have something on his mind,
don't you think?
[...]

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
[...]
Just stay off the sexual innuendo and all will be well with the world.
Saint
Edward the Great is a fearsome Saint and even Ed Dolan the Great fears
him.

Don't be so bold as to even presuppose that you are in any position to
lecture me. Innuendo and accusation are non synonyms. There is a
distinct difference between tongue-in-cheek innuendo and direct
accusation (read unsubstantiated allegation) and it is a given that
there is a substantial recognizable difference in severity and
magnitude between "dead weapon" and sodomy/pederasty and that is
neither open for discussion nor subject to debate. You have made the
mistake of pushing the wrong button on the wrong person. I will
caution you one final time ... should your persist, I will see to it
that all will not be right with your world ... of that much I can
promise you. The proper thing to do would have been for you to issue
a retraction, however one who does not recognize a wrong and who does
not take responsibility for his actions cannot be expected to hold
himself accountable. Pathological egomaniacs are like that. That
much I can accept. A reiteration of you uncorroborated assertion I
cannot and will not. - Jim McNamara

This from an asshole who makes sexual innuendos. He must have perderasty and
sodomy on his mind since he is always making reverences to boys. I urge
McNamara to stop thinking about these things. They are illegal and he will
go in prison where he will end up someone's bitch. Hey, you do not want to
end up having someone like Ed Gin ****ing you, do you? Or do you!

And for Christ's sakes, you dumb asshole, learn how to edit a post.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
aka Jobst Brandt wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../MNBVVL9GK.DTL

Yes, but was the Conquest of Iraq as bad of idea as letting Ed Dolan have
an Internet connection?

The conquest of Iraq was a matter of a few weeks at most. The U.S. Military
went through them like a hot knife through butter. Unfortunately, the
follow-up was just not there. McCain was right - we needed more boots on the
ground in order insure security. Bush and the Repubs always want to do
everything on the cheap.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan wrote:
"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
aka Jobst Brandt wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../MNBVVL9GK.DTL
Yes, but was the Conquest of Iraq as bad of idea as letting Ed Dolan have
an Internet connection?

The conquest of Iraq was a matter of a few weeks at most. The U.S. Military
went through them like a hot knife through butter. Unfortunately, the
follow-up was just not there. McCain was right - we needed more boots on the
ground in order insure security. Bush and the Repubs always want to do
everything on the cheap.

Hey Ed, so when do you ship out to Iraq?

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
[...]
Don't be so bold as to even presuppose that you are in any position to
lecture me. Innuendo and accusation are non synonyms. There is a
distinct difference between tongue-in-cheek innuendo and direct
accusation (read unsubstantiated allegation) and it is a given that
there is a substantial recognizable difference in severity and
magnitude between "dead weapon" and sodomy/pederasty and that is
neither open for discussion nor subject to debate.

Nope, no difference at all. Everyone knows what is meant when you reference
boys. I simply returned the innuendo but I did it 100 times better than you.
That is because I am 100 times smarter than you.

The last time I looked there were 4 lawyers in my family, one of whom is an
excellent litigator. Any suit of yours will immediately be met with a
countersuit. The judge will no doubt get a good laugh out of it but that is
all that will ever happen.

You have made the
mistake of pushing the wrong button on the wrong person.

The only mistake I ever made was thinking you were something other than the
asshole you have ever proven yourself to be.

I will
caution you one final time ... should your persist, I will see to it
that all will not be right with your world ... of that much I can
promise you.

Ed Gin pushed all your buttons too and it was child's play for him just as
it is for me because you are in fact a child. Listen to yourself - nothing
but a long whine. Christ, what a baby you are!

The proper thing to do would have been for you to issue
a retraction, however one who does not recognize a wrong and who does
not take responsibility for his actions cannot be expected to hold
himself accountable. Pathological egomaniacs are like that. That
much I can accept. A reiteration of you uncorroborated assertion I
cannot and will not. - Jim McNamara

Everything with me is tit for tat. Stay off the sexual innuendo or I will
crucify you. I spent 4 years in the Navy as an enlisted man and I know
everything there is to know about our human natures. You get into a name
calling contest with me, one with sexual overtones, and I promise you that
you will lose big time.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

PS. Show this post to your wife and see what she thinks of it. She can't be
as big a baby as you are.

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
Edward Dolan wrote:
"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
aka Jobst Brandt wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../MNBVVL9GK.DTL
Yes, but was the Conquest of Iraq as bad of idea as letting Ed Dolan
have an Internet connection?

The conquest of Iraq was a matter of a few weeks at most. The U.S.
Military went through them like a hot knife through butter.
Unfortunately, the follow-up was just not there. McCain was right - we
needed more boots on the ground in order insure security. Bush and the
Repubs always want to do everything on the cheap.

Hey Ed, so when do you ship out to Iraq?

Nixon was a genius. How so? He instigated the all-volunteer military. As a
result of that reform we now have a professional military who are able and
willing to kick ass in the world. I never want to see a draft again. It is
the worst way to go. I blame it all on Napoleon who began it a couple of
centuries ago.

The only place Ed Dolan is shipping out to is the local cemetary. He is
looking forward to resting in eternal peace.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Mar 29, 10:59 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...]

You have aptly demonstrated that you are a pathological egomaniac who
will not be encumbered or restrained by social mores. The only issue
I have with that is when you make your problem my problem and now you
have. Not only have I showed my wife my posts, but I have showed here
your replies and I am at the moment doing my utmost to persuade her
that I should give you another chance before initiating a lawsuit and
this is from a woman who is beginning her internship as a therapist.
From that, you can assume that you that it was unwise to refer to her
husband as a pederast or to refer to her as fat and ugly. Now I could
care less if you call me an asshole. I'm OK with that and write that
off as just an opinion. I'll even let your miserable, failed attempt to
provoke me with the "fat and ugly" remark regarding my wife, but should
you persist with charges of sodomy or pederasty ... well, lets just
say that you have been fairly forewarned.

You have been warned to stay off the sexual innuendo. If you don't, I will
go after your wife, your dog and whatever else you value. You are a whining
piece of ****, no better than Ed Gin - just another Chicago asshole!

Now go **** yourself and get off of ARBR, you whining piece of ****!
I don't respond very well to threats. Don't be so bold as to even
presuppose that you are in any position to threatened or warn me.

You protest entirely too much, so I can only assume that I must have
touched on a sore spot and consider your continued objection to be
tantamount to affirmation. Innuendo and accusation are not synonyms.
Furthermore, there is a very distinct difference between tongue-in-
cheek innuendo and a deliberate, vindictive and direct accusation
(read malicious, unsubstantiated allegation) with intent to malign and
it is a given that there is a substantial recognizable difference in
severity and magnitude between "dead weapon" and sodomy/pederasty and
that is neither open for discussion, the latter being clearly defined
by law.

The proper thing to do would have been for you to issue a retraction,
however a sociopath never takes responsibility for his actions and
considers himself accountable to no one. Pathological egomaniacs are
like that and you have demonstrated that you a both a sociopath and a
megalomaniac.

You want what I value most? Well that would be my cyber-skirmishes
with you and you cant take that from me by merely ignoring me or
leaving ARBR ;^).

You have no basis upon which to take anything from me that I value,
but I most certainly have such a basis (read libel, slander,
defamation of character), so just keep running your mouth. The hole
you are digging continues to deepen. As for taking my wife, I'm not
sure what you mean. If you mean take as in acquire, good luck, since
her taste in men far exceeds anything that you could possibly offer.
If you mean take as in a fight, she could probably kick your sorry
ass.

One other thing ... I'll leave ARBR on my own terms and not at you
bidding, but I will make you an offer. Leave here and post no more
and, I will be right behind you. Deal or no deal????

Jim McNamara


****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Mar 29, 11:02 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...

"I have not used any language on ARBR that I do not see and hear every
night on the TV
and radio." Another Dolan prevarication.

On Mar 27, 11:57 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...]

No worries there as that would be assault with a DEAD weapon, besides
he likes boys particularly one named Vandeman.

Why is McNamara always referencing boys. He must have something on his mind,
don't you think?
[...]

A L W A Y S ??? Pray tell, how does a single, solitary qualify as
"always". Where are all these other references you refer to? Do you
ever say anything that you can prove as fact. The unsubstantiated
assertionshas become a trademark tool in you arsenal of the absurd.
You want to know what is on my mind? What is on my mind is that you
are ... out of yours.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota