|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Touring advice, one bike or two?
I'm mostly a Toronto-local road rider; I prefer longer 150+ km rides
but mostly end up doing 50k-ish rides after work. I also go on the occasional tour; I've done the Icefields in AB (highly recommended 3- day ride!) and the Cabot Trail (ditto) and this year I'm thinking of doing a week long ride in Peru with some friends. Right now I'm riding a couple-year-old Trek 5000. It's starting to get a little cranky shifting, and will likely need some real work at the end of this season. I got this bike because I was mostly road, and really liked the way it felt over long distances compared to the Canny and Lightspeeds, and especially the 1991 Marin steel road frame I was on at the time. Had I waited one year, I would have got a Roubaix, that's even more aimed at the sort of riding I do. But with a double on the front and no braze-ons, it's almost useless for touring. I've been borrowing a friend's spare MTB, but I have a serious problem with my hands going numb after a couple of hours, and it gets so bad I have to stop every 15 to 20 minutes to let it "cool off". So while it has a great pannier setup and pretty good gearing, it's really less than ideal. So, what do I do for a touring setup? 1) get a new road bike like the 5.2 or Roubaix, set it up with a triple and use a skewer-mounted panier those very few times I tour (along with high-spoke wheels and 32's) 2) buy a second bike with a better touring setup (braze-ons, bigger wheels) and let it rust the other 99% of the time 3) buy an old road bike and re-equip it with a triple -- this seems to take some serious coin Arguments anyone? If I go with (2) or (3), what options do I have for drivetrains that I can use with drop-handle brakes and still get some serious torque? IE, can I use indexed STI's with XT's? Maury |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Touring advice, one bike or two?
On May 20, 11:08 am, Maury Markowitz
wrote: I'm mostly a Toronto-local road rider; I prefer longer 150+ km rides but mostly end up doing 50k-ish rides after work. I also go on the occasional tour; I've done the Icefields in AB (highly recommended 3- day ride!) and the Cabot Trail (ditto) and this year I'm thinking of doing a week long ride in Peru with some friends. Right now I'm riding a couple-year-old Trek 5000. It's starting to get a little cranky shifting, and will likely need some real work at the end of this season. I got this bike because I was mostly road, and really liked the way it felt over long distances compared to the Canny and Lightspeeds, and especially the 1991 Marin steel road frame I was on at the time. Had I waited one year, I would have got a Roubaix, that's even more aimed at the sort of riding I do. But with a double on the front and no braze-ons, it's almost useless for touring. I've been borrowing a friend's spare MTB, but I have a serious problem with my hands going numb after a couple of hours, and it gets so bad I have to stop every 15 to 20 minutes to let it "cool off". So while it has a great pannier setup and pretty good gearing, it's really less than ideal. So, what do I do for a touring setup? 1) get a new road bike like the 5.2 or Roubaix, set it up with a triple and use a skewer-mounted panier those very few times I tour (along with high-spoke wheels and 32's) 2) buy a second bike with a better touring setup (braze-ons, bigger wheels) and let it rust the other 99% of the time For my money, a Surly LHT is nearly a perfect do everything bike right out of the box. I'd replace the tires first thing with Pasela 32s to make the bike a little more nippy. It's going to be 95% as fast as any sport bike out there at 25# or so, and you can bolt the kitchen sink to it when you want to tour. I don't see any reason for it to sit and rust other than you finding long chain stays unfashionable. You thought your Trek was comfy over long distances...try something with a good wheelbase and nice tires at 90 psi. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Touring advice, one bike or two?
On May 20, 11:08 am, Maury Markowitz
wrote: Arguments anyone? If I go with (2) or (3), what options do I have for drivetrains that I can use with drop-handle brakes and still get some serious torque? IE, can I use indexed STI's with XT's? I use barcons with LX on my touring bike - the rear is currently in index mode, the front has always been in friction mode. Shifts like a Porsche most of the time. Has the usual ice issues in winter, but I don't tour in winter and don't need to shift in my part of Toronto. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Touring advice, one bike or two?
In article
, landotter wrote: On May 20, 11:08 am, Maury Markowitz wrote: I'm mostly a Toronto-local road rider; I prefer longer 150+ km rides but mostly end up doing 50k-ish rides after work. I also go on the occasional tour; I've done the Icefields in AB (highly recommended 3- day ride!) and the Cabot Trail (ditto) and this year I'm thinking of doing a week long ride in Peru with some friends. Right now I'm riding a couple-year-old Trek 5000. It's starting to get a little cranky shifting, and will likely need some real work at the end of this season. I got this bike because I was mostly road, and really liked the way it felt over long distances compared to the Canny and Lightspeeds, and especially the 1991 Marin steel road frame I was on at the time. Had I waited one year, I would have got a Roubaix, that's even more aimed at the sort of riding I do. But with a double on the front and no braze-ons, it's almost useless for touring. I've been borrowing a friend's spare MTB, but I have a serious problem with my hands going numb after a couple of hours, and it gets so bad I have to stop every 15 to 20 minutes to let it "cool off". So while it has a great pannier setup and pretty good gearing, it's really less than ideal. So, what do I do for a touring setup? 1) get a new road bike like the 5.2 or Roubaix, set it up with a triple and use a skewer-mounted panier those very few times I tour (along with high-spoke wheels and 32's) 2) buy a second bike with a better touring setup (braze-ons, bigger wheels) and let it rust the other 99% of the time For my money, a Surly LHT is nearly a perfect do everything bike right out of the box. I'd replace the tires first thing with Pasela 32s to make the bike a little more nippy. It's going to be 95% as fast as any sport bike out there at 25# or so, and you can bolt the kitchen sink to it when you want to tour. I don't see any reason for it to sit and rust other than you finding long chain stays unfashionable. You thought your Trek was comfy over long distances...try something with a good wheelbase and nice tires at 90 psi. The beauty of a dedicated touring rig is that, unlike other special purpose designs, it can more than adequately function in other capacities. I echo Landotter's recommendation: get a good tourer. Urbane Cycle's 'Urbanite' house brand includes a touring frameset. It's built of butted 4130 CroMo as the LHT; definitely worthy of consideration. http://ucycle.com/bikes/item.php?nam...r&cat=urbanite |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Touring advice, one bike or two?
landotter wrote:
For my money, a Surly LHT is nearly a perfect do everything bike right out of the box. I'd replace the tires first thing with Pasela 32s to make the bike a little more nippy. It's going to be 95% as fast as any sport bike out there at 25# or so, and you can bolt the kitchen sink to it when you want to tour. I don't see any reason for it to sit and rust other than you finding long chain stays unfashionable. You thought your Trek was comfy over long distances...try something with a good wheelbase and nice tires at 90 psi. I just built up a Pake C'Muter for the ladyfriend. $300 bucks got her a lot of frame a fork. Tange Prestige tubing no less. That thing is steel and super light. Canti--bosses, double eyelets front and rear, rear cable hanger, 132.5 mm rear spacing, the whole 9 yards... I'm impressed and might pick one up after the relocation to PDX. -- Paul M. Hobson ..:change the f to ph to reply:. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Touring advice, one bike or two?
On May 21, 9:32 am, "Paul M. Hobson" wrote:
landotter wrote: For my money, a Surly LHT is nearly a perfect do everything bike right out of the box. I'd replace the tires first thing with Pasela 32s to make the bike a little more nippy. It's going to be 95% as fast as any sport bike out there at 25# or so, and you can bolt the kitchen sink to it when you want to tour. I don't see any reason for it to sit and rust other than you finding long chain stays unfashionable. You thought your Trek was comfy over long distances...try something with a good wheelbase and nice tires at 90 psi. I just built up a Pake C'Muter for the ladyfriend. $300 bucks got her a lot of frame a fork. Tange Prestige tubing no less. That thing is steel and super light. Canti--bosses, double eyelets front and rear, rear cable hanger, 132.5 mm rear spacing, the whole 9 yards... I'm impressed and might pick one up after the relocation to PDX. I'd pretty much compare that to a Surly Crosser to be fair. Good price for a light Tange frame for sure. The stays are 35mm shorter than a LHT--cross bike short or fashionably short if you're calling it a "commuter"--but not an issue, unless you're a guy like me with Real Man (46+) size feet and want to run panniers without going "fppp fppp fppp" all the way home. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Touring advice, one bike or two?
On May 21, 10:57*am, landotter wrote:
I'd pretty much compare that to a Surly Crosser to be fair. Good price for a light Tange frame for sure. The stays are 35mm shorter than a LHT--cross bike short or fashionably short if you're calling it a "commuter"--but not an issue, unless you're a guy like me with Real Man (46+) size feet and want to run panniers without going "fppp fppp fppp" all the way home. No concern here, I'm only 5'9", the only problem I have is hitting the front on hard turns. Ok, point taken... cheap touring frame it is. Ok, so for the comfort side, what do I look for in geometry that will get me a little more head-up than a traditional road frame? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Touring advice, one bike or two?
On May 21, 3:29 pm, Maury Markowitz wrote:
On May 21, 10:57 am, landotter wrote: I'd pretty much compare that to a Surly Crosser to be fair. Good price for a light Tange frame for sure. The stays are 35mm shorter than a LHT--cross bike short or fashionably short if you're calling it a "commuter"--but not an issue, unless you're a guy like me with Real Man (46+) size feet and want to run panniers without going "fppp fppp fppp" all the way home. No concern here, I'm only 5'9", the only problem I have is hitting the front on hard turns. Ok, point taken... cheap touring frame it is. Ok, so for the comfort side, what do I look for in geometry that will get me a little more head-up than a traditional road frame? That's more a result of picking the right size, correct stem, spacers, etc. A frame like the Pake that Paul linked to is a really nice option with the extended head tube--which helps avoid a stupid amount of spacers if any. It's got pretty sporty geometry and all of the braze ons so you can bolt on the Cuisinart and bug ZapR as needed for your trips. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Touring advice, one bike or two?
On May 21, 4:29*pm, Maury Markowitz wrote:
Ok, point taken... cheap touring frame it is. Ok, so for the comfort side, what do I look for in geometry that will get me a little more head-up than a traditional road frame? Look for a non-racy shop, first. Someone's already mentioned Urbane (John Street, above Queen, Toronto, Canada.) They understand uncut steerers, etc. I put "interrupter" brakes on my bike so I can ride on the tops and still have full control - they interfer with many handlebar bags, but that can usually be worked around. You don't want to completely sacrific the head-down option when touring. Headwinds are worse than hills and can go on for days in some places. I like combination pedals - clipless on one side, flat on the other - too, as clipping out can give your feet a bit of a break at the end of the day. Handy if you need to ride your bike to a meal or shower after setting up for the night, too, when you might be wearing other shoes. Definitely a comfort item. Bigger tires, too - 32s or wider. And splurge on handlebar tape. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Touring advice, one bike or two?
On May 20, 9:08 am, Maury Markowitz wrote:
Arguments anyone? If I go with (2) or (3), what options do I have for drivetrains that I can use with drop-handle brakes and still get some serious torque? IE, can I use indexed STI's with XT's? You can with an XT rear but not front, as the MTB FDs have different cable pull rates. Surly LHT uses an XT rear with a Tiagra triple front. They stock it with bar-cons, but it would work with STIs no problem. And when it comes to touring triples, by far the best choice is the Sugino XD600. The 110/74BCD is the most sensible format for touring, allowing lows down to 24t and highs up into the 50s. MTB cranks are geared too low for most folks' tastes, and the rings are too small to work with STI-compatible FDs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Touring Rim Advice | John Everett | Techniques | 18 | January 25th 08 09:53 PM |
Advice for touring Yorkshire? | [email protected] | UK | 7 | May 30th 05 08:41 AM |
Expert advice- touring | Dave Barton | Recumbent Biking | 105 | August 30th 04 11:33 PM |
Advice requested for touring bike purchase. | Gene Titus | Recumbent Biking | 11 | May 13th 04 04:09 AM |
Touring bike advice | Matthew Shaylor | UK | 26 | November 29th 03 12:05 PM |