When did tires get so expensive?

lets blame this one on Carmichael.

On Jan 3, 4:53*pm, landotter wrote:
On Jan 3, 3:01*pm, Chalo wrote:





AMuzi wrote:

landotter wrote:

AMuzi wrote:

Meanwhile over at the Obama administration's Big Lie
Department, Stalin and Goebbels insist there is no inflation.

Bad hyperbole doesn't suit you.

Laugh or cry:http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf

Ds and Rs have been equally complicit in meddling with the CPI to
obscure the real cost of living "because those prices are volatile".
Ha! *Excluding the "volatile" food and energy sectors basically means
that increases in prices of necessities (food, clothing, shelter, and
transportation) are not taken into account. *They even shift the
goalposts around (which they call "hedonic regression") so that if
manufacturers add a new button to your TV, then CPI says it doesn't
cost any more, even if it does.

This isn't a Right vs. Left issue; it's the Money Party versus the
people. *(The Money Party leans hard to the right, though.)

On Jan 12, 11:05*am, Tºm Shermªn™ °_° ""twshermanREMOVE\"@THI
$southslope.net" wrote:
On 1/12/2011 11:39 AM, Friar Broccoli wrote:
* [...]

If anyone wants to avoid Hitler and Goebbels pejoratives, I simply
ask: name one senator who's not been bought by industry as evidence ...

The few of them that have come around are gone. *With the SCOTUS
defining corporations as people and corporate campaign advertising as
free speech, there will never be another, unless the system is reformed
to become a true democracy instead of a de-facto plutocracy.

The ruling also applies to trade unions, so the commies can buy their
advertising, too. The fascists and commies can hash it out for us in
their ad campaigns.

I like Pluto http://connect.in.com/disney-charact...e46d0c0a5.html
So I don't have a problem with a plutocracy. -- Jay Beattie.

Brainless idiot!

On Jan 12, 2:02*pm, AMuzi wrote:
Friar Broccoli wrote:
On Jan 3, 4:53 pm, landotter wrote:
On Jan 3, 3:01 pm, Chalo wrote:

AMuzi wrote:
landotter wrote:
AMuzi wrote:
Meanwhile over at the Obama administration's Big Lie
Department, Stalin and Goebbels insist there is no inflation.
Bad hyperbole doesn't suit you.
Laugh or cry:http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf
Ds and Rs have been equally complicit in meddling with the CPI to
obscure the real cost of living "because those prices are volatile".
Ha! *Excluding the "volatile" food and energy sectors basically means
that increases in prices of necessities (food, clothing, shelter, and
transportation) are not taken into account. *They even shift the
goalposts around (which they call "hedonic regression") so that if
manufacturers add a new button to your TV, then CPI says it doesn't
cost any more, even if it does.
This isn't a Right vs. Left issue; it's the Money Party versus the
people. *(The Money Party leans hard to the right, though.)

*.

On 1/12/2011 1:36 PM, Jay Beattie wrote:
On Jan 12, 11:05 am, Tºm Shermªn™ °_°""twshermanREMOVE\"@THI
$southslope.net" wrote:
On 1/12/2011 11:39 AM, Friar Broccoli wrote:
[...]

If anyone wants to avoid Hitler and Goebbels pejoratives, I simply
ask: name one senator who's not been bought by industry as evidence ...

The few of them that have come around are gone. With the SCOTUS
defining corporations as people and corporate campaign advertising as
free speech, there will never be another, unless the system is reformed
to become a true democracy instead of a de-facto plutocracy.

The ruling also applies to trade unions, so the commies can buy their
advertising, too. The fascists and commies can hash it out for us in
their ad campaigns.[...]

The corporations have much more money. Money = Advertising = Votes.

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007
I am a vehicular cyclist.

On 1/12/2011 3:19 PM, !Jones wrote:
Brainless idiot!


What are you writing about?

Usenet includes a quoting feature.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZ731aR_SBY

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007
I am a vehicular cyclist.

"Tºm Shermªn™ °_°" wrote in message
...

On 1/10/2011 11:12 PM, Bill Sornson wrote:

?
[...]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011106068.html

On 1/12/2011 10:16 PM, Bill Sornson wrote:
[...]

The leading question mark disappeared.

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007
I am a vehicular cyclist.

"Tºm Shermªn™ °_°" wrote in message
...

On 1/12/2011 10:16 PM, Bill Sornson wrote:
[...]

The leading question mark disappeared.

I noticed that, too. Think it's because you don't post in "plain text"?
(It's always much smaller print than nearly all others.)

Maybe I'll fool around with that on my end...but I don't think it'll fix the
funky (non) quoting issue. (I manually added the '' to your one-line
remark, but far too lazy and forgetful to do it for lengthy posts.)

Bill "why, Mr. Gates, why?!?" S.