"Crit Pro is killing Pro Cycling," says Cow Punk.

**** yourself. Really. Do NOT post in RBR ever again, Cow Punk.

cp

On 09/21/2004 07:02 PM, in article
, "crit pro"
wrote:

**** yourself. Really. Do NOT post in RBR ever again, Cow Punk.



Or what?




--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com
veloworks at worldnet dot ay tea tee dot net
bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash

crit pro wrote:
**** yourself. Really. Do NOT post in RBR ever again, Cow Punk.

cp

What stikes me as funny is that you both think that posting to RBR has
some impact on cycling. Delusional.

RVD
One of a few retards who post/reads this stupid site representing like
..00005% of the cycling population and 99.99% of the stupid geek cyclist
population.

"Rik Van Diesel" wrote in message
oups.com...

crit pro wrote:
**** yourself. Really. Do NOT post in RBR ever again, Cow Punk.

cp

What stikes me as funny is that you both think that posting to RBR has
some impact on cycling. Delusional.

RVD
One of a few retards who post/reads this stupid site representing like
.00005% of the cycling population and 99.99% of the stupid geek cyclist
population.


RVD,

Your new Delta-house name shall be Retard Stupid Geek, RSG for short.
http://www.stephenbishop.com/animal.wav

Anyway, I used to agree with you that rbr represented like the smallest,
wackiest sliver of the cycling population but I'm not so sure anymore... Of
the bike-racing people I actually know physically, as opposed to virtually,
nobody posts to rbr, but I'd say around 20 of them lurk here. If that ratio
applies to everybody who does post, then what, maybe a few thousand look at
rbr?? So what are there, maybe 100,000 bike racers in the world? Ergo, it's
more like 3% read rbr. Q.E.D.

Mark
(EMRSG--Even More Retardeder Stupider Geekier)

Mark Fennell wrote:
"Rik Van Diesel" wrote in message
oups.com...

crit pro wrote:
**** yourself. Really. Do NOT post in RBR ever again, Cow Punk.

RVD
One of a few retards who post/reads this stupid site representing
like
.00005% of the cycling population and 99.99% of the stupid geek
cyclist
population.


RVD,

Your new Delta-house name shall be Retard Stupid Geek, RSG for short.
http://www.stephenbishop.com/animal.wav

rbr?? So what are there, maybe 100,000 bike racers in the world?
Ergo, it's
more like 3% read rbr. Q.E.D.

Mark
(EMRSG--Even More Retardeder Stupider Geekier)

Mark,

First I laughed very hard at the RSG. However, before you proof this
equation. 100000/6,000,000,000=0.000166667 much closer to .00005% than
3%.

RVD

"Rik Van Diesel" wrote in message
ups.com...

Mark Fennell wrote:
"Rik Van Diesel" wrote in message
oups.com...

crit pro wrote:
**** yourself. Really. Do NOT post in RBR ever again, Cow Punk.

RVD
One of a few retards who post/reads this stupid site representing
like
.00005% of the cycling population and 99.99% of the stupid geek
cyclist
population.


RVD,

Your new Delta-house name shall be Retard Stupid Geek, RSG for short.
http://www.stephenbishop.com/animal.wav

rbr?? So what are there, maybe 100,000 bike racers in the world?
Ergo, it's
more like 3% read rbr. Q.E.D.

Mark
(EMRSG--Even More Retardeder Stupider Geekier)

Mark,

First I laughed very hard at the RSG. However, before you proof this
equation. 100000/6,000,000,000=0.000166667 much closer to .00005% than
3%.

RVD

RVD (Really Very Dense),

Dammit, I hold two degrees in math from a Prestigious American University...
I will not sit idly by while my detailed and important calculations are
challenged, especially after the work has already been published in a highly
respected, peer-reviewed forum such as RBR!!!

Listen up grasshopper, my claim was that a few thousand read rbr which *is*
a few percent (as in ~3%) of the claimed total *bike-racing* population of
~100,000.

Class dismissed.

Listen up grasshopper, my claim was that a few thousand read rbr which *is*
a few percent (as in ~3%) of the claimed total *bike-racing* population of
~100,000.

Class dismissed.

That would be about the same percentage, as the population of
Americans, that will vote in the upcoming presidential election?

(CowPunk) wrote in message . com...
Listen up grasshopper, my claim was that a few thousand read rbr which *is*
a few percent (as in ~3%) of the claimed total *bike-racing* population of
~100,000.

Class dismissed.

That would be about the same percentage, as the population of
Americans, that will vote in the upcoming presidential election?

Ok, so that same percentage of USCF registered racers participated in
the following election:
http://usacycling.org/news/user/story.php?id=1323

Sad, isn't it? Not many, but they run our sport.

Miller

From: (Miller)

Sad, isn't it? Not many, but they run our sport.

Miller



Noone stopped anybody from voting. It's really sad that so many people who run
their mouths so often do so little.
It took me all of 5 minutes to vote on-line. Granted it was easier and quicker
for me as I was familiar with the people involved, but it wouldn't take long to
do the homework, and we could attempt to have some good discussions here about
the people and issues involved too.
Bill C

TritonRider wrote:
From: (Miller)

Sad, isn't it? Not many, but they run our sport.

Miller

Noone stopped anybody from voting. It's really sad that so many people who run
their mouths so often do so little.
It took me all of 5 minutes to vote on-line. Granted it was easier and quicker
for me as I was familiar with the people involved, but it wouldn't take long to
do the homework, and we could attempt to have some good discussions here about
the people and issues involved too.
Bill C

I used to vote in USCF elections. Every damn one. But I don't anymore.
The USCF Board doesn't have much to do anymore, so there isn't really
any point. The bulk of their responsibilities and authority have been
removed, there isn't much left.

In 1995 the turnout was around 14%. I know in earlier years it was
higher. But it is hard to get excited about an election for a
figurehead body.

Bob Schwartz