Thieves on bikes are not too bright

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/866767-d...e-in-north-sea

"Phil W Lee" wrote in message
news
"Mrcheerful" considered Sun, 19 Jun 2011
13:10:33 +0100 the perfect time to write:



http://www.metro.co.uk/news/866767-d...e-in-north-sea

Motorists don't seem to need any justification at all though, so who
is the more stupid?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-13830017


Australians.

On Jun 19, 1:10*pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/866767-d...rs-try-to-hide...

FAIL!

Like thieves adopting any other mode of transport are somehow more
intelligent.

Another attempt to make some point or other by citing some arbitrary
news item in a vain attempt to make some kind of connection, which
does not exist. And yet again, no point is actually made, no argument
won, the intellectual vacuum that is the OP continues.

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:42:47 +0100, Phil W Lee wrote:

"Mrcheerful" considered Sun, 19 Jun 2011
13:10:33 +0100 the perfect time to write:



http://www.metro.co.uk/news/866767-d...e-in-north-sea

Motorists don't seem to need any justification at all though, so who
is the more stupid?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-13830017


Good old Anchor - always game :
--

Pyscholist Rule Number 6a

If people are continually getting the better of you in arguments - fall back on the "But what about motorists, they are much worse ....".
Respond to a post - or start a new thread with some irrelevant item.
It does no good to the actual argument - but it shows you up as a real prat - and hence you are living up to the psycholist creed.