|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Would you like the Govt to promote biking?
You know biking must be very low on their priority when you are honked
at, yelled at, pushed around and even spit at for doing the right thing and riding a bike. It could be another way, you know. Like cyclists getting respect --and even admiration-- if one of our presidents spoke thus... "My fellow Americans, in light of scarce oil as well as the threat of Terrorism and Global Warming, the days of the hungry dinosaurs are over. Yes, no more SUVs, starting with my own. Instead, we will go back to the smartest, cleanest and simplest vehicle ever created: the bike. You shouldn't look at it though as a sacrifice, but as the means to enjoy more free time. Yes, you won't to work your life away to keep a Stupid Unnecessry Vehicle. And to top if off, you can be as sexy as me..." And then the President rides off in his lycra suit... Well, the last part may not be such a great idea, but the rest is. So do you agree that the goverment can do more, far more, to make bicycling part of the American landscape? Here's what I would do if I ever were president... "Bicycles should the first line of development, then public transportation, then alternative vehicles..." WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE (beware of the lion) http://webspawner.com/users/donquijote |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Would you like the Govt to promote biking?
"ComandanteBanana" wrote in message ... You know biking must be very low on their priority when you are honked at, yelled at, pushed around and even spit at for doing the right thing and riding a bike. It could be another way, you know. Like cyclists getting respect --and even admiration-- if one of our presidents spoke thus... "My fellow Americans, in light of scarce oil as well as the threat of Terrorism and Global Warming, the days of the hungry dinosaurs are over. Yes, no more SUVs, starting with my own. Instead, we will go back to the smartest, cleanest and simplest vehicle ever created: the bike. You shouldn't look at it though as a sacrifice, but as the means to enjoy more free time. Yes, you won't to work your life away to keep a Stupid Unnecessry Vehicle. And to top if off, you can be as sexy as me..." And then the President rides off in his lycra suit... Well, the last part may not be such a great idea, but the rest is. So do you agree that the goverment can do more, far more, to make bicycling part of the American landscape? Here's what I would do if I ever were president... You are even dumber than Bush and would make a horrible President. His adviser will at least tell him that having everybody ride a bike will both increase the consumption of oil to grow more food and will cause even more problems than already exist in the world food supply. You have been told this but since you are dumber than President Bush, you still don't understand it. He and his adviser will also see that the bike is totally worthless transportation mode for most of the transportation capabilities needed by the public. Bikes will then be a total failure. The worst thing that can possibly happen to a politician. They will realize the stupidity of trying to turn bikes into a major form of transportations. Since you are considerably dumber than the President, it is obvious you have no concept of what is required for a major mode of transportation. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Would you like the Govt to promote biking?
On May 20, 11:54*am, ComandanteBanana
wrote: You know biking must be very low on their priority when you are honked at, yelled at, pushed around and even spit at for doing the right thing and riding a bike. It could be another way, you know. Like cyclists getting respect --and even admiration-- if one of our presidents spoke thus... "My fellow Americans, in light of scarce oil as well as the threat of Terrorism and Global Warming, the days of the hungry dinosaurs are over. Yes, no more SUVs, starting with my own. Instead, we will go back to the smartest, cleanest and simplest vehicle ever created: the bike. You shouldn't look at it though as a sacrifice, but as the means to enjoy more free time. Yes, you won't to work your life away to keep a Stupid Unnecessry Vehicle. And to top if off, you can be as sexy as me..." And then the President rides off in his lycra suit... Well, the last part may not be such a great idea, but the rest is. So do you agree that the goverment can do more, far more, to make bicycling part of the American landscape? Here's what I would do if I ever were president... "Bicycles should the first line of development, then public transportation, then alternative vehicles..." WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE (beware of the lion)http://webspawner.com/users/donquijote Okay, make a list of the things this administration has done right and/ or well. Now, you want them to promote biking? Getting the administration behind it would be a sure-fire way to make sure NO ONE bikes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Would you like the Govt to promote biking?
On May 20, 10:28 pm, "Jack May" wrote:
You are even dumber than Bush and would make a horrible President. His adviser will at least tell him that having everybody ride a bike will both increase the consumption of oil to grow more food and will cause even more problems than already exist in the world food supply. You don't know what a calorie is. You don't recognize the equation F=MA. He and his adviser will also see that the bike is totally worthless transportation mode for most of the transportation capabilities needed by the public. Bikes will then be a total failure. The worst thing that can possibly happen to a politician. They will realize the stupidity of trying to turn bikes into a major form of transportations. You have never been to Holland. R |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Would you like the Govt to promote biking?
"Jack May" wrote in message . .. "ComandanteBanana" wrote in message ... You know biking must be very low on their priority when you are honked at, yelled at, pushed around and even spit at for doing the right thing and riding a bike. It could be another way, you know. Like cyclists getting respect --and even admiration-- if one of our presidents spoke thus... "My fellow Americans, in light of scarce oil as well as the threat of Terrorism and Global Warming, the days of the hungry dinosaurs are over. Yes, no more SUVs, starting with my own. Instead, we will go back to the smartest, cleanest and simplest vehicle ever created: the bike. You shouldn't look at it though as a sacrifice, but as the means to enjoy more free time. Yes, you won't to work your life away to keep a Stupid Unnecessry Vehicle. And to top if off, you can be as sexy as me..." And then the President rides off in his lycra suit... Well, the last part may not be such a great idea, but the rest is. So do you agree that the goverment can do more, far more, to make bicycling part of the American landscape? Here's what I would do if I ever were president... You are even dumber than Bush and would make a horrible President. His adviser will at least tell him that having everybody ride a bike will both increase the consumption of oil to grow more food and will cause even more problems than already exist in the world food supply. You have been told this but since you are dumber than President Bush, you still don't understand it. You obviously don't believe it either, since you do exercise that is in excess of what you have to do to minimally accomplish what you need to do in a day. If you really believed it, you would sit absolutely still when not required to move, so as not to stress the environment. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Would you like the Govt to promote biking?
CommandanteBanana/DonQuixote/LoonProblem writes:
Here's what I would do if I ever were president... =v= If you were President, the U.S. would annoy the U.K. very much, if you inability to honor rudimentary Usenet courtesy is any indications. (Followups NOT to uk.rec.cycling.) Jack May writes: His adviser will at least tell him that having everybody ride a bike will both increase the consumption of oil to grow more food and will cause even more problems than already exist in the world food supply. =v= I could imagine Bush's adviser saying such a thing. Bush's advisers frequently say blitheringly idiotic things like that. Jack May here clearly shows that he's qualifies for a job in the lame duck Shrub Administration. _Jym_ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Would you like the Govt to promote biking?
ComandanteBanana schrieb:
You know biking must be very low on their priority when you are honked at, yelled at, pushed around and even spit at for doing the right thing and riding a bike. Actually a good sign for you, that you must do something right, if the others, try to act as unfair as possible ... compare it to some ball game or similar. It could be another way, you know. Like cyclists getting respect --and even admiration-- if one of our presidents spoke thus... Presidential words wouldn't change a damn thing! At least not if spoken only once! "My fellow Americans, in light of scarce oil as well as the threat of Terrorism and Global Warming, the days of the hungry dinosaurs are over. Yes, no more SUVs, starting with my own. Instead, we will go back to the smartest, cleanest and simplest vehicle ever created: the bike. You shouldn't look at it though as a sacrifice, but as the means to enjoy more free time. Yes, you won't to work your life away to keep a Stupid Unnecessry Vehicle. And to top if off, you can be as sexy as me..." Haha, that's good for starters! But only for the beginning. Regular (=every day) practise of habits like that would bring firstly good PR for cycling and would change the leader's point of view for good. And then the President rides off in his lycra suit... Well, the last part may not be such a great idea, but the rest is. Why not? She/he's a human with stinking farts and other necessities as every other person, So why not lycra for increased cycling comfort instead of trying to cycle in suit and tie. So do you agree that the goverment can do more, far more, to make bicycling part of the American landscape? Definitely! Every government, except maybe the Danish or Dutch, they already have a terrific cycling share of the modal split. Here's what I would do if I ever were president... "Bicycles should the first line of development, then public transportation, then alternative vehicles..." Almost perfect. Put pedestrians first. Tadej -- “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” Upton Sinclair in The Jungle |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Would you like the Govt to promote biking?
Jym Dyer wrote:
CommandanteBanana/DonQuixote/LoonProblem writes: Here's what I would do if I ever were president... =v= If you were President, the U.S. would annoy the U.K. very much, if you inability to honor rudimentary Usenet courtesy is any indications. +1, Jym If I were El Presidente, the *very* first thing I'd do would be to send the OP to the camps for re-education. With a cattle prod. -- The Pimply-Faced Youth LARTing lusers since, apparently, forever |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Would you like the Govt to promote biking?
Jack May schrieb:
"ComandanteBanana" wrote in message ... You know biking must be very low on their priority when you are honked at, yelled at, pushed around and even spit at for doing the right thing and riding a bike. It could be another way, you know. Like cyclists getting respect --and even admiration-- if one of our presidents spoke thus... "My fellow Americans, in light of scarce oil as well as the threat of Terrorism and Global Warming, the days of the hungry dinosaurs are over. Yes, no more SUVs, starting with my own. Instead, we will go back to the smartest, cleanest and simplest vehicle ever created: the bike. You shouldn't look at it though as a sacrifice, but as the means to enjoy more free time. Yes, you won't to work your life away to keep a Stupid Unnecessry Vehicle. And to top if off, you can be as sexy as me..." And then the President rides off in his lycra suit... Well, the last part may not be such a great idea, but the rest is. So do you agree that the goverment can do more, far more, to make bicycling part of the American landscape? Here's what I would do if I ever were president... You are even dumber than Bush and would make a horrible President. His adviser will at least tell him that having everybody ride a bike will both increase the consumption of oil to grow more food and will cause even more problems than already exist in the world food supply. Of course, if his/her adviser would be some of your ignorant car-frenzied breed. Your claims of cycling being less energy efficient than private motorized transportation are not getting more true, even if you're repeating them in a monotonous way. They have been proven to be deliberately wrong by at least one order of magnitude in this newsgroup here (a.p.u) at least twice in the recent past. But I guess it's worthless to argue wit a person according to the one described in the signature. Your so called "research" to back up your ridiculous claims ist still pending to be named by you. You have been told this but since you are dumber than President Bush, you still don't understand it. Besides personal insults, you do not provide anything here. He and his adviser will also see that the bike is totally worthless transportation mode for most of the transportation capabilities needed by the public. Bikes will then be a total failure. The worst thing that can possibly happen to a politician. They will realize the stupidity of trying to turn bikes into a major form of transportations. Most transportation capabilities as far as I remember transport inquiries in my country (EU, Austria) comprise of: *) moving abt. one person (transporting goods not capable of being transported with a bike due to bulkiness and weight amounts to abt. 10-15% of trips) *) trip-lengths of 3-5 km length in more than 50% of the trips made. The US-situation might not be as favourable as elsewhere due to sprawled out city structure and wider distributed trip lengths. But not a real challenge for people with average fitness either, given non-cycling-hostile boundary conditions. Since you are considerably dumber than the President, it is obvious you have no concept of what is required for a major mode of transportation. Thanks for your enlightening words. Tadej -- “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.†Upton Sinclair in The Jungle |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Would you like the Govt to promote biking?
On May 20, 10:28*pm, "Jack May" wrote:
"ComandanteBanana" wrote in message ... You know biking must be very low on their priority when you are honked at, yelled at, pushed around and even spit at for doing the right thing and riding a bike. It could be another way, you know. Like cyclists getting respect --and even admiration-- if one of our presidents spoke thus... "My fellow Americans, in light of scarce oil as well as the threat of Terrorism and Global Warming, the days of the hungry dinosaurs are over. Yes, no more SUVs, starting with my own. Instead, we will go back to the smartest, cleanest and simplest vehicle ever created: the bike. You shouldn't look at it though as a sacrifice, but as the means to enjoy more free time. Yes, you won't to work your life away to keep a Stupid Unnecessry Vehicle. And to top if off, you can be as sexy as me..." And then the President rides off in his lycra suit... Well, the last part may not be such a great idea, but the rest is. So do you agree that the goverment can do more, far more, to make bicycling part of the American landscape? Here's what I would do if I ever were president... You are even dumber than Bush and would make a horrible President. His adviser will at least tell him that having everybody ride a bike will both increase the consumption of oil to grow more food and will cause even more problems than already exist in the world food supply. You have been told this but since you are dumber than President Bush, you still don't understand it. He and his adviser will also see that the bike is totally worthless transportation mode for most of the transportation capabilities needed by the public. * Bikes will then be a total failure. * *The worst thing that can possibly happen to a politician. * They will realize the stupidity of trying to turn bikes into a major form of transportations. Since you are considerably dumber than the President, it is obvious you have no concept of what is required for a major mode of transportation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If Americans saved energy by being lazy, McDonald's would go out of business. But Americans are lazy and eat a lot. If they rode bikes though at least they would be fit. And probably eat better... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady | ComandanteBanana | General | 130 | May 14th 08 03:51 PM |
If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady | ComandanteBanana | Rides | 12 | May 9th 08 03:24 PM |
If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady | ComandanteBanana | UK | 13 | May 9th 08 03:24 PM |
If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady | ComandanteBanana | Recumbent Biking | 8 | May 4th 08 08:07 PM |
If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady | ComandanteBanana | Australia | 8 | May 4th 08 08:07 PM |