#21
|
|||
|
|||
Roundabouts
On Jan 31, 9:39*am, Bruce wrote:
What *would* make sense is for older drivers, including you, to drive in the same way that has been taught to learners for some years, is expected in driving tests (and indeed any alternative approach may contribute towards a failure) and is clearly indicated in the figure above Clause 186 in the Highway Code. *To do otherwise introduces additional, unnecessary risk of a collision. Maybe I'm a hybrid of old and new. My view for straight on has tended to be... 1. If it's a dual carriageway, either lane is acceptable. You should exit the roundabout in the lane you entered it in, unless you check it is clear to pull in. 2. If it's a single carriageway, you should only go straight on from the left lane. If you do from the right lane, you should treat it exactly as if you were performing an overtake, i.e. only pull in if it's clear to pull in and not assume anything about the actions of the driver you are "overtaking". That approach would seem to satisfy both types of driver. It's also worth being aware of muppets who think the left lane is OK for left, straight on *and right* when using the right lane for straight on. Ideally always avoid being directly alongside another driver on a roundabout if at all possible. Neil |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Roundabouts
On Jan 31, 9:39*am, Bruce wrote:
Remember that ignorance of the current rules of the road (because they have changed since you passed your test) is no excuse. Don't think my posting worked so I'll try again. I must be a hybrid of both types of driver. IMO the best approach to dealing with both situations is to treat going straight on on a single carriageway from the right lane as an overtake - i.e. it is up to you, not the driver on the left, to ensure you have enough space to safely pull in at your exit, and if there isn't to drop behind the car you were attempting to "overtake" instead of trying to cut in front of it. In a sense it is an overtake, as there's no good reason to go straight on from the right lane if the left lane is completely clear. On a dual carriageway, I'd say you can go straight on from either lane so long as you exit the roundabout in the lane you entered it (i.e. left lane = straight on, into left lane, right lane = straight on, into right lane). But in doing so beware of muppets turning right from the left lane. Normally on major dual carriageways the lanes are marked up to this effect. Neil |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Roundabouts
Neil Williams wrote:
On Jan 31, 9:39*am, Bruce wrote: What *would* make sense is for older drivers, including you, to drive in the same way that has been taught to learners for some years, is expected in driving tests (and indeed any alternative approach may contribute towards a failure) and is clearly indicated in the figure above Clause 186 in the Highway Code. *To do otherwise introduces additional, unnecessary risk of a collision. Maybe I'm a hybrid of old and new. My view for straight on has tended to be... 1. If it's a dual carriageway, either lane is acceptable. You should exit the roundabout in the lane you entered it in, unless you check it is clear to pull in. 2. If it's a single carriageway, you should only go straight on from the left lane. If you do from the right lane, you should treat it exactly as if you were performing an overtake, i.e. only pull in if it's clear to pull in and not assume anything about the actions of the driver you are "overtaking". That approach would seem to satisfy both types of driver. It's also worth being aware of muppets who think the left lane is OK for left, straight on *and right* when using the right lane for straight on. Ideally always avoid being directly alongside another driver on a roundabout if at all possible. That all sounds sensible, Neil, but any deviation from what new drivers have been taught for the last couple of decades (and are expected to do on their driving test, or invite failure) carries a risk. In the event of a collision, any deviation from this new norm effectively puts the driver on the wrong side of the law and makes them liable. So my advice (not that anyone asked!) is always to use the left lane when going straight on. Of course the fact that the majority of drivers now seem to do this probably invites a minority of drivers to gain advantage by using the 'wrong' lane, including some older drivers who are unaware that the rules of the road have changed. But that's life. ;-) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Roundabouts
"Ian Smith" wrote in message
... Yes, you make some valid points. I have no problems with using either lane for straight on where allowed, prudent, and readily anticipated by others. But it was my understanding that the original post criticised those who ignore/disobey lane markings or signs, and thus invite conflict in doing so. I would always use the left lane on a single-lane-in-each-direction road if I was going straight on, in the absence of any instructions to the contrary. Where that default rule is over-ruled by advance lane-usage signs, those signs need to be very clear and repeated several times, to allow plenty of warning that it's *not* the default state. On a dual carriageway where the exit is also two-lane, I may use Lane 2. If the entry is dual and the exit is single (eg because the major road turns left and I want the minor straight on road) I may use the right hand lane and go all the way round so as to avoid a long queue of left-turning traffic. As the HC advises, I don't indicate on approach if I'm going straight ahead. I may indicate left as I pass the previous (left) exit, though on a small roundabout, there is very little time between passing that exit and taking the straight on one - it is better to indicate late rather than early because a premature left signal may make someone think I'm turning left and pull out in front of me. The difficulty is when the exit is not absolutely straight ahead because the road curves in the last few yards before the give-way line: do you indicate left if it leaves at 11 o clock position or right if it leaves at 1 o clock position, with the possibility of people thinking I intend to take the previous or following exit? I err on the side of not indicating in this situation; my fiancee always indicates if the exit is a few degrees either side of straight on (and moans at me for not doing the same). For example, at this roundabout http://g.co/maps/pbs77 would you indicate right if you were on the A64 and going north to continue on the A64 or left if going south? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Roundabouts
On Jan 31, 1:28*pm, "Mortimer" wrote:
The difficulty is when the exit is not absolutely straight ahead because the road curves in the last few yards before the give-way line: do you indicate left if it leaves at 11 o clock position or right if it leaves at 1 o clock position, with the possibility of people thinking I intend to take the previous or following exit? Often, the exit that is termed "straight on" (usually the continuation of the road you are approaching on) is indicated as a thicker line on the signs, which helps in the decision. On mini roundabouts, there often isn't time to switch from right to left, and as there aren't usually multiple lanes (Hemel/Swindon aside) this isn't a problem. But if you're going to leave a roundabout with 2 or more lanes (or one that's two or more car widths wide) while indicating right you're taking a massive risk. But I would go with you and say never, ever indicate left early - that is inviting people to pull out in front of you. By contrast, indicating right (while it might scare the driver to the right of you) is a good way of saying "I don't want *this* exit" if you feel the person to your right may have some doubt and cut across you or into the side of you. There are lane-marked roundabouts (the A41-M25 one being an example, I think) where an unusual marked layout may confuse and this sort of thing helps make your intentions very clear. Another situation where it might be useful is a 5- or 6-ways roundabout where there are two turns that might be seen as "left" or "straight on". Neil |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Roundabouts
On Jan 31, 12:28*pm, "Mortimer" wrote:
"Ian Smith" wrote in message ... Yes, you make some valid points. I have no problems with using either lane for straight on where allowed, prudent, and readily anticipated by others. But it was my understanding that the original post criticised those who ignore/disobey lane markings or signs, and thus invite conflict in doing so. I would always use the left lane on a single-lane-in-each-direction road if I was going straight on, in the absence of any instructions to the contrary. Where that default rule is over-ruled by advance lane-usage signs, those signs need to be very clear and repeated several times, to allow plenty of warning that it's *not* the default state. On a dual carriageway where the exit is also two-lane, I may use Lane 2. If the entry is dual and the exit is single (eg because the major road turns left and I want the minor straight on road) I may use the right hand lane and go all the way round so as to avoid a long queue of left-turning traffic. As the HC advises, I don't indicate on approach if I'm going straight ahead. I may indicate left as I pass the previous (left) exit, though on a small roundabout, there is very little time between passing that exit and taking the straight on one - it is better to indicate late rather than early because a premature left signal may make someone think I'm turning left and pull out in front of me. The difficulty is when the exit is not absolutely straight ahead because the road curves in the last few yards before the give-way line: do you indicate left if it leaves at 11 o clock position or right if it leaves at 1 o clock position, with the possibility of people thinking I intend to take the previous or following exit? I err on the side of not indicating in this situation; my fiancee always indicates if the exit is a few degrees either side of straight on (and moans at me for not doing the same). For example, at this roundabouthttp://g.co/maps/pbs77would you indicate right if you were on the A64 and going north to continue on the A64 or left if going south? In that instance I'd signal right approaching the roundabout if going north. Going south I'd only signal to exit the roundabout. My logic is that going north I'm clearly stating I'm not going left. Going south, I'm going straight on. If this isn't correct, I am prepared to listen. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Roundabouts
On Jan 31, 2:49*pm, al Mossah wrote:
In that instance I'd signal right approaching the roundabout if going north. *Going south I'd only signal to exit the roundabout. *My logic is that going north I'm clearly stating I'm not going left. *Going south, I'm going straight on. *If this isn't correct, I am prepared to listen. I'd usually base it on the sign. http://g.co/maps/n34ma to me would say (northbound) indicate right on approaching THEN change to indicating left once I had passed the first exit. But I don't think omitting the right indication would cause any confusion either, as there are only two exits, and the "main" exit is clearly marked on the sign. What would be a problem would be:- 1. Indicating left on approaching the roundabout - people would correctly think you'd be taking the B1261 and this could[1] cause an accident. 2. Indicating right but NOT switching to a left indication before leaving the roundabout. This causes a reduction in "bandwidth" of the roundabout, because anyone approaching from the north would have to assume you were going to continue all the way round. This is a big bugbear in Milton Keynes when it is busy, and it alone causes congestion! Going southbound, either indicating left on approaching the roundabout (as it's the first exit) or indicating left a short way round the roundabout (as it's more or less straight on) would both get the message across, and neither should cause any confusion. Indicating right would mean you want the B1261. [1] Peoples' signalling is unreliable enough that I tend to be looking for other things as well, like them turning their wheels past the point where they could *not* take the exit. Neil |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Roundabouts
On Jan 31, 4:14*pm, Neil Williams wrote:
2. Indicating right but NOT switching to a left indication To add to that, the Highway Code allows, if I recall, for you not to switch to a left indication if there isn't time. However, I generally only find that there isn't time on mini roundabouts, and then only some of them. But this "error" merely reduces the bandwidth of the road (i.e. it's an inconsiderate error, not a dangerous one), so it is of far lesser importance than (1), which would be downright dangerous. On the rare occasion that I change my mind about an exit having already signalled left for it, assuming there is no vehicle behind me or to my right in which case changing my mind is not a safe option and I will take it anyway then find somewhere to turn round, I would briefly indicate right (to signify I intend *not* to take the exit) but also prepare to give way to anyone approaching the roundabout at the next exit who may have been confused by the aborted signal. Similarly, if doing a U-turn at a small roundabout (where people will tend not to expect it), it is a good idea to prepare to give way at the furthest-round exit. That isn't in the Highway Code, but is sensible defensive driving; if you have made an error that could in any way cause confusion, prepare for others to be confused and to accommodate their resulting actions. Neil |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Roundabouts
In message , Bruce
writes What *would* make sense is for older drivers, including you, to drive in the same way that has been taught to learners for some years, is expected in driving tests (and indeed any alternative approach may contribute towards a failure) and is clearly indicated in the figure above Clause 186 in the Highway Code. To do otherwise introduces additional, unnecessary risk of a collision. I've just looked at the above figure (above Clause 186) and it does not prohibit what I was taught in 1963, that you may use the outside lane to exit the roundabout opposite your entry. -- Clive |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Roundabouts
On 31/01/2012 06:51, Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:57:26 +0000, The Real Doctor wrote: whether to annoy people by moving into the correct lane or whether to annoy people by taking the wrong lane onto the roundabout. Or if in doubt approach in the right hand lane and go round 1.5 times, which shouldn't really annoy anyone. Good suggestion. Approaching in the RFL and describing 270 degrees round the roundabout (to turn left) is often a useful tactic. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Roundabouts? | [email protected][_2_] | Recumbent Biking | 8 | February 11th 10 10:01 PM |
Roundabouts | Trevor Brown | UK | 158 | August 27th 08 05:52 PM |
Roundabouts - turning right | Katanga-Man | UK | 8 | June 4th 04 10:47 PM |
I hate roundabouts. | Simon Mason | UK | 21 | October 17th 03 01:48 PM |
Roundabouts - how to take them? | FM | UK | 14 | July 23rd 03 12:15 PM |