A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » Australia
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

rural amusement



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old October 10th 06, 01:55 PM posted to aus.bicycle
Duncan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default rural amusement

"BrettS" wrote in message
...
Duncan wrote:
"Zebee Johnstone" wrote in message
...

In aus.bicycle on Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:53:35 +1000
asterope wrote:

"great way to get yourself killed, love."

i almost fell off my bike i was laughing so hard.

I had a bod on a Vespa tell me I ought to get a flag cos I was "so
hard to see".



He's got a point. I mainly lurk here but when you were deciding on a

bike I
almost piped up to talk you out of a recumbent. For a lot of drivers
they're practicaly invisible, they're less manouverable and wider so

more
likely to be clipped. A flag doesn't cut it, a burning flare might be a
better option.


If he can't see something 2 foot wide, a foot longer than most
bicycles, and where the rider's seat is as high as a car seat then I
think the RTA's eyesight test needs work.



As you yourself have pointed out it's not about eyesight, it's about
processing what you see. People just aren't looking for recumbents so

they
won't see them. I've seen recumbents so low they don't make it up to a

cars
window, on top of that they keep getting stuck lane splitting. A driver
could do everything right and still hit them.


Well I would suggest that the driver wouldn't have done *everything*
right then. Especially as you just pointed out - you can see them.


I don't drive a car but if a recumbent lower than your window split up on
your left side how are you going to see it? This may be rare but I've seen
it happen.

How is a recumbent (even a low one like your talking about) different
from other similar sized objects likely to be found on the roads such as:
* Children?
* Domestic animals?
* Wheelie bins?


Well they can all be hard to see which is exactly my point. Do you think
it's always a good idea for children, animals or wheelie bins to be on the
road? I don't want to ban any of these things, just realise the dangers.

Saying that someone is putting themselves in greater danger because they
ride a bike which is deemed too small/narrow to be seen properly is a
cop out. The SMIDSY phenomenon is alive and well putside of cycling
circles. You only have to see the number of people who drive into the
back of other cars, busses and trucks to know that size doesn't make a
scrap of difference.


You're saying there is no increased danger with decreased visibility? I'm
not convinced.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Art of Rural Cycling? [email protected] General 39 August 30th 05 02:22 AM
dangers of rural roads wafflycat UK 48 May 18th 05 10:25 AM
Setting local speed limits on rural single carriageway roads Paul UK 13 December 2nd 04 09:09 PM
Amusement Park Unicyclist? The_SkunkMan Unicycling 12 August 22nd 04 12:16 AM
racing 400km on dirt roads (aka Rural Bike) - Road or MTB? Boyd Speerschneider Racing 5 July 18th 03 11:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.