|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
"Luigi de Guzman" wrote in message
... On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:08:49 GMT, "Mike Kruger" wrote: The whole Phoenix code, in searchable form, is he http://livepublish.municode.com/2/lp...tmain-nf-hitli st.htm&2.0 (this specific link is the result of a search on "sidewalk") Oh, and my previous post may have been a bit snippy. I certainly agree with those who point out that, legal or not, it is imprudent for a bicyclist to ride on the sidewalk in the "wrong" direction at a high rate of speed. In my pedestrian mode, I'm really tired of people blocking the sidewalks. Agreed. But now what I want to know is whether or not there is a difference between a cyclist and a pedestrian on the sidewalk, legally-speaking. If a cyclist on the sidewalk is considered a pedestrian moving really really fast, that's one thing. If the cyclist is considered a vehicle operator who is incidentally permitted to operate on the sidewalk (where other vehicles are not permitted), then that's qutie another, isn't it? Phoenix code sounds more like your second meaning, as least as I interpret this part: "Whenever any person is riding a bicycle upon a sidewalk he shall yield the right-of-way to any pedestrian. (Code 1962, § 37-25.05) " |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
"Claire Petersky" wrote:
"Mike Jacoubowsky/Chain Reaction Bicycles" wrote in message . com... So, to me, even if the cyclist was acting legally, he's still an idiot waiting to be killed. I agree with Mike. It is inherently unsafe to be riding the wrong way on the sidewalk. This behavior is only excusable for children using their bikes as toys under adult supervision; or cyclists at extremely low rate of speeds, i.e., at a walking pace, or perhaps "Fred Flintstoning" along. When I come out of the transit station downtown, I scootle in this fashion for a half block to get to the street, for example. One of my regular routes includes a short section where I can avoid crossing a busy four lane road twice (and that in a VERY odd and confusing intersection). I sometimes take the option of taking the sidewalk for the width of the intersection (about 100 yards/meters), but I keep in mind that I am riding in a manner that will prevent many people from seeing me (approaching most traffic from the wrong side). I yield to anything and everything when I'm doing this, and keep my speed down to the point where I can stop "no matter what". Then again, I've spent some time recently in Phoenix, my impression is that the city seems to suffer from an extremely car-centric design and behavior, and totally clueless cyclists. You just want to knock everyone's heads together and put some sense in their brains. First, banging on car hoods, now "knocking heads". ;-) Tsk, tsk, tsk. Phoenix is a large city, and isn't as bad as most I've lived in (in terms of cycling anyway). The east valley (Tempe, Mesa, Scottsdale, Gilbert) actually has quite a workable system of bike facilities including wide, clearly marked dedicated bike lanes (not "paths") on about half the major roads. And FWIW, the motorists (in the Phoenix east valley) seem to be more cognizant of cyclists - but apparently agree with Claire on the "cluelessness" of the cyclists, as most will act as if they expect me to run stop signs / traffic lights, etc. - and are as a result almost annoyingly acommodating. Most, that is - there are jerks here as well. Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles http://www.habcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
"Eric S. Sande" writes:
But is a cyclist on the sidewalk a *pedestrian* that must be yielded to? A good hair splitting queston. In my opinion, no. The cyclist wouldn't have been on the sidewalk in the first place, it was illegal. Whether it is legal or not varies from place to place. In the town I live in, you can ride a bicycle on the sidewalks everywhere except for two small business districts. On a few streets, you can use the sidewalk, but are required to ride in the same direction as traffic (according to posted signs.) In this town, many of the streets where you can ride a bicycle on the sidewalk are residential streets with little traffic, with the sidewalk usage consisting primarily of small children riding up and down the sidewalk in front of their homes, without ever crossing an intersection. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 04:28:20 -0800, progunner wrote:
OK, I'm not sure if I have the correct ng for this topic, or if this is even on topic, so I cross posted to another ng. hoping to get a response. (So, please forgive me if I am ot) ---------- I need clarification about bicycle riders riding bicycles on sidewalks in Phoenix, Arizona. Is this covered by state, county or city statutes??? Typically, sidewalk riding is covered by city statutes, although there is some general stuff statewide. I get error messages at the links to the Arizona laws, unfortunately. You might have better luck; others have posted the URLs. Typically central business districts prevent riding on sidewalks, but smaller towns and suburban areas don't. It is, however, a bad idea to ride on a sidewalk. There are exceptions, but they are rare. Out of nowhere, a bicyclist [approaching the vehicle on the passenger side, (right to left) and moving much faster than a walking or jogging pedestrian] almost rams the passenger side of the vehicle, and starts swearing at the driver of the vehicle for not yielding to the bicyclist on the sidewalk. Others have assumed that the vehicle was sitting still, blocking the sidewalk. You make it seem as if you, I mean, the vehicle, was crossing the sidewalk. If the vehicle was stationary, then the cyclist, as in any traffic situation, is obligated to not hit it. Blocking a lane may be obstructing right-of-way, but there is not much you, I mean, the driver, can do about yielding right-of-way at that point. If the sidewalk was clear when you entered it, you have a right to proceed safely across. If that means you have to stop, the safe crossing of the intersection outweighs the blocking of the lane. If the car was moving, then the driver has an obligation to not hit pedestrians. They would have right-of-way in these circumstances, I*believe. But a cyclist should be treated as a vehicle, and is in most states. As such, what was mentioned earlier about smaller road/larger road may or may not apply, since you are talking about a driveway versus a sidewalk, and it is debatable which is "larger". Frankly, any cyclist riding on a sidewalk has to be an idiot to not worry about each and every driveway. That is one reason why it is a bad idea to ride on a sidewalk in the first place. They are, much of the time, as dangerous as wrong-way cyclists on streets, as your scenerio described. Move the rider to the street, closest to the sidewalk, and he becomes a wrong-way rider. That is perhaps the most dangerous place to ride, for the reasons you mention. You can't see him, you have to look the other way to watch for traffic, and the rider suddenly appears under your tire. Good luck convincing the guy. -- David L. Johnson __o | The lottery is a tax on those who fail to understand mathematics. _`\(,_ | (_)/ (_) | |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:53:44 -0500, Luigi de Guzman
wrote in message : SMIDSY? "sorry, mate I didn't see you?" Correct. In any event, Guy, the cyclist was counterflow and moving fast on the footpath. Nobody looks for anything there. A few of these SMIDSY incidents and I was a confirmed vehicular cyclist. No arguments there - but consider the relative likelihood of (a) a cyclist failing to see a stationary car and T-boning it and (b) a car driver failing to see a cyclist and moving into its path. On balance of probabilities (b) gets it every time, being the basis of a fair proportion of bike crashes. Moral: don't ride on the footway. -- Guy === May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:19:58 +0100, Dalibor Bauernfrajnd
wrote in message : no matter if he is allowed to be there, if you hit a bicycle with your car, it's gonna be your fault. Also, if a bike rams you, it's his fault. Unless, for example, the bike rams you because you move into its path having failed to see it. -- Guy === May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
"Mark Hickey" wrote in message
... "Claire Petersky" wrote: "Mike Jacoubowsky/Chain Reaction Bicycles" wrote in message . com... So, to me, even if the cyclist was acting legally, he's still an idiot waiting to be killed. I agree with Mike. It is inherently unsafe to be riding the wrong way on the sidewalk. This behavior is only excusable for children using their bikes as toys under adult supervision; or cyclists at extremely low rate of speeds, i.e., at a walking pace, or perhaps "Fred Flintstoning" along. When I come out of the transit station downtown, I scootle in this fashion for a half block to get to the street, for example. One of my regular routes includes a short section where I can avoid crossing a busy four lane road twice (and that in a VERY odd and confusing intersection). I sometimes take the option of taking the sidewalk for the width of the intersection (about 100 yards/meters), but I keep in mind that I am riding in a manner that will prevent many people from seeing me (approaching most traffic from the wrong side). I yield to anything and everything when I'm doing this, and keep my speed down to the point where I can stop "no matter what". Then again, I've spent some time recently in Phoenix, my impression is that the city seems to suffer from an extremely car-centric design and behavior, and totally clueless cyclists. You just want to knock everyone's heads together and put some sense in their brains. First, banging on car hoods, now "knocking heads". ;-) Tsk, tsk, tsk. Phoenix is a large city, and isn't as bad as most I've lived in (in terms of cycling anyway). The east valley (Tempe, Mesa, Scottsdale, Gilbert) actually has quite a workable system of bike facilities including wide, clearly marked dedicated bike lanes (not "paths") on about half the major roads. And FWIW, the motorists (in the Phoenix east valley) seem to be more cognizant of cyclists - but apparently agree with Claire on the "cluelessness" of the cyclists, as most will act as if they expect me to run stop signs / traffic lights, etc. - and are as a result almost annoyingly acommodating. Most, that is - there are jerks here as well. Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles http://www.habcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame I'm in Tempe. The city puts bike lanes on low traffic side streets where they're not need tthem to begin with. The majority of the major roads do not have bike lanes and has traffic speeds of 45 - 55MPH except during 'rush' hour. If I was just out for a joy ride, then yes, there are bike routes I can travel. But I use a bicycle as a means of transportation to actually go to places. Currently I get at least 2 persistant car honkers and about 1 person yelling out their window per mile. The city puts up signs that say ' Bicycle Friendly Community', but that certainly doesn't refer to the people. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
"Bobby" wrote:
"Mark Hickey" wrote Phoenix is a large city, and isn't as bad as most I've lived in (in terms of cycling anyway). The east valley (Tempe, Mesa, Scottsdale, Gilbert) actually has quite a workable system of bike facilities including wide, clearly marked dedicated bike lanes (not "paths") on about half the major roads. And FWIW, the motorists (in the Phoenix east valley) seem to be more cognizant of cyclists - but apparently agree with Claire on the "cluelessness" of the cyclists, as most will act as if they expect me to run stop signs / traffic lights, etc. - and are as a result almost annoyingly acommodating. Most, that is - there are jerks here as well. I'm in Tempe. The city puts bike lanes on low traffic side streets where they're not need tthem to begin with. The majority of the major roads do not have bike lanes and has traffic speeds of 45 - 55MPH except during 'rush' hour. OK, I say "about half" and you say "the majority do not"... If I was just out for a joy ride, then yes, there are bike routes I can travel. But I use a bicycle as a means of transportation to actually go to places. I do too - to the tune of 5-7,000 miles per year. The majority of it is on bike lanes. I guess you must live in a part of the Tempe I've never ridden in (though I didn't realize there were any). Currently I get at least 2 persistant car honkers and about 1 person yelling out their window per mile. Now I KNOW you are riding in a part of Tempe I've never ridden in. I can't remember the last time this happened to me. I'd say this happens to me once every four to six months. The city puts up signs that say ' Bicycle Friendly Community', but that certainly doesn't refer to the people. Same planet, different world. If the rest of you would like to find how the Phoenix area compares to where YOU live in terms of planning for bicycles, check out their excellent online document at: http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/bicycl...n/bikeplan.PDF If you'd like to see how "sparse" the bike lanes/paths/routes are check out the map on page 22 (the dark lines are all bike lanes/paths/routes"). I've lived in a lot of places, and other than Beijing, the Phoenix east valley has the best bike facilities. I'm sure there are some out there that are better... but considering the cost of building the bike lanes (averages well over $100K per mile), I'm surprised there are as many as there are. Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles http://www.habcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:08:49 GMT, "Mike Kruger"
wrote: In my pedestrian mode, I'm really tired of people blocking the sidewalks. I walk about eight blocks each way in downtown DC. The ones that block open sight intersections, especially crosswalks, irritate me. OTOH, alleys opening into places like Q street, I let it go - better they block the sidewalk for a moment than get killed entering the intersection blind. I borrowed a car from my brother long ago - some long hooded Ford from my brother (some Torino deriviative - Elite maybe?). I was coming out of an alley in downtown Wichita and found it literally impossible to see traffic without putting the front of the car into the roadway (by a small bit). Was rather glad to get back to my Fiat 124. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:19:58 +0100, Dalibor Bauernfrajnd
wrote: Don't know the exact laws there, but, no matter if he is allowed to be there, if you hit a bicycle with your car, it's gonna be your fault. Also, if a bike rams you, it's his fault. Then everything else. That would probably be the first decider - even if riding on the sidewalk is illegal. If the bicycle is in the grill, it would be on the motorist to prove whether or not the cyclist was moving too fast to be avoided; cyclist wedged in door, the cyclist starts at the disadvantage. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
published helmet research - not troll | patrick | Racing | 1790 | November 8th 04 03:16 AM |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | General | 1927 | October 24th 04 06:39 AM |
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP! | progunner | General | 30 | March 15th 04 10:54 AM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | General | 17 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | Social Issues | 14 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |