A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Trek 7700FX



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 30th 04, 04:37 PM
M Powell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Trek 7700FX

New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised that
the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike there
was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you change
out the cassette?

--M. Powell
remove first p to reply


Ads
  #2  
Old August 30th 04, 05:30 PM
Mike Jacoubowsky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised
that
the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike
there
was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you
change
out the cassette?


That's pretty much a "feature" of a wide-range cassette. Since it's a
9-speed, you have many options available, if you don't mind slicing off a
bit of the low-end.

Where is the jump that you're noticing?

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com


"M Powell" wrote in message
ink.net...
New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised
that
the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike
there
was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you
change
out the cassette?

--M. Powell
remove first p to reply




  #3  
Old August 30th 04, 05:30 PM
Mike Jacoubowsky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised
that
the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike
there
was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you
change
out the cassette?


That's pretty much a "feature" of a wide-range cassette. Since it's a
9-speed, you have many options available, if you don't mind slicing off a
bit of the low-end.

Where is the jump that you're noticing?

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com


"M Powell" wrote in message
ink.net...
New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised
that
the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike
there
was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you
change
out the cassette?

--M. Powell
remove first p to reply




  #4  
Old August 30th 04, 05:34 PM
Paul Bauer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Its a wider gear ratio used on that model.(ala touring bikes and mountain
bikes)
If it is not to your liking, by all means change out the cassette.

Paul


"M Powell" wrote in message
ink.net...
New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised
that
the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike
there
was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you
change
out the cassette?

--M. Powell
remove first p to reply




  #5  
Old August 30th 04, 05:34 PM
Paul Bauer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Its a wider gear ratio used on that model.(ala touring bikes and mountain
bikes)
If it is not to your liking, by all means change out the cassette.

Paul


"M Powell" wrote in message
ink.net...
New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised
that
the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike
there
was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you
change
out the cassette?

--M. Powell
remove first p to reply




  #6  
Old August 31st 04, 01:06 AM
Fx199
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised that
the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike there
was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you change
out the cassette?

--M. Powell
remove first p to reply










I have the same bike. It seems like the big front cog is way too big, I
generally use the middle ring. I like the bike quite a bit though, how about
you? If you change the cassette out, please post your results.
  #7  
Old August 31st 04, 01:06 AM
Fx199
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised that
the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike there
was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you change
out the cassette?

--M. Powell
remove first p to reply










I have the same bike. It seems like the big front cog is way too big, I
generally use the middle ring. I like the bike quite a bit though, how about
you? If you change the cassette out, please post your results.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trek 7700FX: How strong are these wheels? Lobo Tommy General 10 May 6th 04 02:37 PM
2004 - Trek 1400? Trek 1200? comments? yuri budilov Techniques 1 April 4th 04 10:53 PM
Klein vs. Trek (crossposted) Lester Long Techniques 9 September 29th 03 06:47 PM
FA: TREK Aluminum Investment Cast Lugs & Tubing The Ink Company Marketplace 0 September 8th 03 01:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.