|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Odd - but is it a good idea?
Hey there.
Out looking to buy my first mountain bike. Been road cycling with the same bike for about 20 years - and bikes ain't what they used to be. :-) Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this "Lefty Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin - didn't notice the design difference. What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad? Also - any other comments on this bike (again - good or bad) are appreciated. I'll be using the bike for some city commuting as well as some trail riding. Thanks, Sparky -- In the end it is all ok. If it is not ok, then it is not the end. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Odd - but is it a good idea?
"Sparky" wrote: Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this "Lefty Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin - didn't notice the design difference. What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad? It's the system with a single shock absorber on one side of the wheel, right? Well, the sceptic in me says the fork will develop a certain amount of play as it wears. How much is hard to say, it's probably a heavy-duty design after all, but I think it's unavoidable to not at least get some, and the whole thing looks rather gimmicky to me. I suppose it's meant to be lighter than a bike with a standard dual shock fork. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Odd - but is it a good idea?
"Lenny" wrote in message ... "Sparky" wrote: Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this "Lefty Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin - didn't notice the design difference. What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad? It's the system with a single shock absorber on one side of the wheel, right? Well, the sceptic in me says the fork will develop a certain amount of play as it wears. How much is hard to say, it's probably a heavy-duty design after all, but I think it's unavoidable to not at least get some, and the whole thing looks rather gimmicky to me. I suppose it's meant to be lighter than a bike with a standard dual shock fork. Lenny: Thanks for the input - I was kinda thinking the same as you - but the guys in the bike shop pointed out that cars have "one sided" front suspension system (no dual sided forks on the front tires of my truck) and they pointed out that the front folding wheels of jets have the same unilateral system.... - it's still odd to me... :-) Sparky |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Odd - but is it a good idea?
On Sun, 23 May 2004 08:30:43 +0000, Sparky wrote:
Lenny: Thanks for the input - I was kinda thinking the same as you - but the guys in the bike shop pointed out that cars have "one sided" front suspension system (no dual sided forks on the front tires of my truck) Not quite. The typical front suspension on cars has two arms that hold the spindle. and they pointed out that the front folding wheels of jets have the same unilateral system.... Again, not quite. Many planes use some sort of folding triangular syspension, not a simple shock. They also don't use it to steer with. And planes don't drive on the ground.... The standards for jet landing surfaces are far more stringent than most mountain bike trails. :-) My take on those is that I wouldn't own one. You're asking a shock to do lots - it has to handle steering torque, shock absorbtion, flex, off-center loads.... Just seems easier to use two arms. Any failure in the shock is likely to be catastrophic. --Kamus -- o__ | May your trails be dim, lonesome, stony, narrow, winding and ,/'_ | only slightly uphill. May the wind bring rain for the slickrock (_)\(_) | potholes fourteen miles on the other side of yonder blue ridge. | May God's dog serenade your campfire, may the rattlesnake and o | the screech owl amuse your reveries, may the Great Sun dazzle [] | your eyes by day and the Great Bear watch over you at night. /\ | \ \ | - Edward Abbey, Beyond the Wall |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Odd - but is it a good idea?
In article rrYrc.567642$oR5.422622@pd7tw3no,
"Sparky" wrote: Hey there. Out looking to buy my first mountain bike. Been road cycling with the same bike for about 20 years - and bikes ain't what they used to be. :-) Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this "Lefty Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin - didn't notice the design difference. What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad? Also - any other comments on this bike (again - good or bad) are appreciated. Looks weird, but Cannondale has been making Leftys for some time, and the feedback is almost universally positive. The fork is a winner by the accounts I have read, though I haven't looked up reliability reports. -- Ryan Cousineau, http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/ President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Odd - but is it a good idea?
Lenny wrote:
"Sparky" wrote: Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this "Lefty Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin - didn't notice the design difference. What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad? It's the system with a single shock absorber on one side of the wheel, right? Well, the sceptic in me says the fork will develop a certain amount of play as it wears. How much is hard to say, it's probably a heavy-duty design after all, but I think it's unavoidable to not at least get some, and the whole thing looks rather gimmicky to me. I suppose it's meant to be lighter than a bike with a standard dual shock fork. I ride a "normal" fork with 2 pistons but only in 1 is an air-spring the other is just show. I had to replace the bearing in the fork about every 6 months. Only more expensive forks have in both legs air- or steel-springs. The damping is allways asymetrical. One leg damps the compression, the other damps the expansion (optional) Normally you would expect a symetrical design in a symetrical fork. I would prefer rather a one legged fork where everything is in it instead of a fork which pretends to have everything which it doesn't. Greetings, Urs -- +------------------------- | Urs Weder | N 47°23'23" E 9°39'47" +------------------------- ( modify address for return email ) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Odd - but is it a good idea?
On Sun, 23 May 2004 05:50:06 -0400, Kamus of Kadizhar wrote:
Again, not quite. Many planes use some sort of folding triangular syspension, not a simple shock. True. They also don't use it to steer with. So what, planes only go in staright lines when taxi-ing into the hanger, or taxi-ing onto the runway? And planes don't drive on the ground.... Again, do they float or something? My take on those is that I wouldn't own one. You're asking a shock to do lots - it has to handle steering torque, shock absorbtion, flex, off-center loads.... Just seems easier to use two arms. Any failure in the shock is likely to be catastrophic. Well the Lefty has been around for a good 4 years or so now. Lopes used it, Gracia uses it, Anno-caro used it. Havent heard of any failures. Seems like its holding up OK. -- Matt Fear of a flat planet |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Odd - but is it a good idea?
Sparky wrote:
Hey there. Out looking to buy my first mountain bike. Been road cycling with the same bike for about 20 years - and bikes ain't what they used to be. :-) Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this "Lefty Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin - didn't notice the design difference. What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad? Also - any other comments on this bike (again - good or bad) are appreciated. I'll be using the bike for some city commuting as well as some trail riding. Thanks, Sparky -- In the end it is all ok. If it is not ok, then it is not the end. I never like proprietary nature of the C'dales. I just like to be able to buy stock parts for a bike anywhere. -- - Zilla Cary, NC (Remove XSPAM) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Odd - but is it a good idea?
On 2004-05-23, Sparky penned:
Hey there. Out looking to buy my first mountain bike. Been road cycling with the same bike for about 20 years - and bikes ain't what they used to be. :-) Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this "Lefty Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin - didn't notice the design difference. What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad? I went to a mtb clinic taught by a pro racer who's sponsored by Cannondale. She rides a Scalpel, which also has a lefty fork. I asked her what she thought about it, and she said she had no problems with it. I also asked her wrench/husband about it, and he said he likes it -- fewer parts to fail. Now, they're on the C'dale dole, so would they say anything even if they didn't like it? Probably not. Still, they seemed like pretty straightforward people. -- monique |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Odd - but is it a good idea?
On 2004-05-23, Zilla penned:
I never like proprietary nature of the C'dales. I just like to be able to buy stock parts for a bike anywhere. I'd never heard this before. Other than the lefty, which seems to be a unique cannondale thing, what does c'dale do that's different from other manufacturers? Do they purposely use different sizings and such? -- monique |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for a good bike shop in Montreal | Daniel Crispin | General | 4 | June 13th 04 12:12 AM |
GT zaskar LE '96 good deal? | Mukti | Mountain Biking | 4 | August 13th 03 02:47 PM |
Good price? | Marty | Mountain Biking | 2 | August 11th 03 07:23 AM |
Value of a good dealer. | Fred | General | 3 | July 11th 03 06:17 AM |