|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Cars in future could be brought to standstill if driver gets tooangry
On 22/09/2019 14:33, JNugent wrote:
On 22/09/2019 14:25, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:03, TMS320 wrote: On 21/09/2019 15:19, JNugent wrote: [Devices which sense the extent of a driver's irritation or anger and are capable of limiting the vehicle's operation as an amelioration method.] Those would be very useful if they could be adapted for compulsory use by those permanently-angry urban cyclists constantly on the lookout for the opportunity for a fight with... well, with just about anyone, really. It has recently been established that you just make this up. Pity there are no spittle sensors on your computer. Denial... never a good tactic. It's a valid response to your allegation. Up to you to prove it. You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else. How do you know what other people think? The people I'm referring to give no signs of doing much thinking. You compared me to everybody else. I am the only one that thinks? Well, that's kind of you. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Cars in future could be brought to standstill if driver gets tooangry
On 22/09/2019 14:33, JNugent wrote:
On 22/09/2019 14:29, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:14, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote: You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else. Topically, take a look at this warrior, so recently praised in this NG: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7447037/Hunt-head-butting-cyclist-ran-red-light-clipped-pedestrian.html It's known as an anecdote. It's also known as an example. Cambridge dictionary: example ~ something that is typical of the group of things that it is a member of. Then you are wrong. I suppose it doesn't count when 100 drivers a day use their car bodywork...? Or it's a blind spot you have. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Cars in future could be brought to standstill if driver gets tooangry
On 22/09/2019 15:26, TMS320 wrote:
On 22/09/2019 14:33, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:25, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:03, TMS320 wrote: On 21/09/2019 15:19, JNugent wrote: [Devices which sense the extent of a driver's irritation or anger and are capable of limiting the vehicle's operation as an amelioration method.] Those would be very useful if they could be adapted for compulsory use by those permanently-angry urban cyclists constantly on the lookout for the opportunity for a fight with... well, with just about anyone, really. It has recently been established that you just make this up. Pity there are no spittle sensors on your computer. Denial... never a good tactic. It's a valid response to your allegation. Up to you to prove it. You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else. How do you know what other people think? The people I'm referring to give no signs of doing much thinking. You compared me to everybody else. I am the only one that thinks? Well, that's kind of you. I didn't compare you to anybody or anything. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Cars in future could be brought to standstill if driver gets tooangry
On 22/09/2019 15:32, TMS320 wrote:
On 22/09/2019 14:33, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:29, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:14, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote: You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else. Topically, take a look at this warrior, so recently praised in this NG: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7447037/Hunt-head-butting-cyclist-ran-red-light-clipped-pedestrian.html It's known as an anecdote. It's also known as an example. Cambridge dictionary: example ~ something that is typical of the group of things that it is a member of. Then you are wrong. A chav scofflaw cyclist is typical of chav scofflaw cyclists. What else could you call someone like the cyclist in that video? I suppose it doesn't count when 100 drivers a day use their car bodywork...? Or it's a blind spot you have. We aren't discussing "other people". We are discussing cyclists. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Cars in future could be brought to standstill if driver gets tooangry
On 23/09/2019 00:34, JNugent wrote:
On 22/09/2019 15:26, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:33, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:25, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:03, TMS320 wrote: On 21/09/2019 15:19, JNugent wrote: [Devices which sense the extent of a driver's irritation or anger and are capable of limiting the vehicle's operation as an amelioration method.] Those would be very useful if they could be adapted for compulsory use by those permanently-angry urban cyclists constantly on the lookout for the opportunity for a fight with... well, with just about anyone, really. It has recently been established that you just make this up. Pity there are no spittle sensors on your computer. Denial... never a good tactic. It's a valid response to your allegation. Up to you to prove it. You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else. How do you know what other people think? The people I'm referring to give no signs of doing much thinking. You compared me to everybody else. I am the only one that thinks? Well, that's kind of you. I didn't compare you to anybody or anything. Then you should be able to explain (in English, please) what this means- "You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else." |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Cars in future could be brought to standstill if driver gets tooangry
On 23/09/2019 11:41, TMS320 wrote:
On 23/09/2019 00:34, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 15:26, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:33, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:25, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:03, TMS320 wrote: On 21/09/2019 15:19, JNugent wrote: [Devices which sense the extent of a driver's irritation or anger and are capable of limiting the vehicle's operation as an amelioration method.] Those would be very useful if they could be adapted for compulsory use by those permanently-angry urban cyclists Â*constantly on the lookout for the opportunity for a fight with... well, with just about anyone, really. It has recently been established that you just make this up. Pity there are no spittle sensors on your computer. Denial... never a good tactic. It's a valid response to your allegation. Up to you to prove it. You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else. How do you know what other people think? The people I'm referring to give no signs of doing much thinking. You compared me to everybody else. I am the only one that thinks? Well, that's kind of you. I didn't compare you to anybody or anything. Then you should be able to explain (in English, please) what this means- "You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else." Of course I could. But I don't need to. Its meaning is obvious (to those who don't have difficulty with English and I'm not addressing anyone else). As a side issue, you ought to get a dictionary and look up the meaning of the word "compare". It seems that you regard it a word which can used indiscriminately without regard either to its meaning or the immediate context. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Cars in future could be brought to standstill if driver gets tooangry
On 23/09/2019 13:12, JNugent wrote:
On 23/09/2019 11:41, TMS320 wrote: On 23/09/2019 00:34, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 15:26, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:33, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:25, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:03, TMS320 wrote: On 21/09/2019 15:19, JNugent wrote: [Devices which sense the extent of a driver's irritation or anger and are capable of limiting the vehicle's operation as an amelioration method.] Those would be very useful if they could be adapted for compulsory use by those permanently-angry urban cyclists Â*constantly on the lookout for the opportunity for a fight with... well, with just about anyone, really. It has recently been established that you just make this up. Pity there are no spittle sensors on your computer. Denial... never a good tactic. It's a valid response to your allegation. Up to you to prove it. You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else. How do you know what other people think? The people I'm referring to give no signs of doing much thinking. You compared me to everybody else. I am the only one that thinks? Well, that's kind of you. I didn't compare you to anybody or anything. Then you should be able to explain (in English, please) what this means- "You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else." Of course I could. But I don't need to. Its meaning is obvious (to those who don't have difficulty with English and I'm not addressing anyone else). As a side issue, you ought to get a dictionary and look up the meaning of the word "compare". It seems that you regard it a word which can used indiscriminately without regard either to its meaning or the immediate context. As ever, wriggling out takes more words than to explain. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Cars in future could be brought to standstill if driver gets tooangry
On 23/09/2019 15:45, TMS320 wrote:
On 23/09/2019 13:12, JNugent wrote: On 23/09/2019 11:41, TMS320 wrote: On 23/09/2019 00:34, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 15:26, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:33, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:25, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:03, TMS320 wrote: On 21/09/2019 15:19, JNugent wrote: [Devices which sense the extent of a driver's irritation or anger and are capable of limiting the vehicle's operation as an amelioration method.] Those would be very useful if they could be adapted for compulsory use by those permanently-angry urban cyclists Â*constantly on the lookout for the opportunity for a fight with... well, with just about anyone, really. It has recently been established that you just make this up. Pity there are no spittle sensors on your computer. Denial... never a good tactic. It's a valid response to your allegation. Up to you to prove it. You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else. How do you know what other people think? The people I'm referring to give no signs of doing much thinking. You compared me to everybody else. I am the only one that thinks? Well, that's kind of you. I didn't compare you to anybody or anything. Then you should be able to explain (in English, please) what this means- "You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else." Of course I could. But I don't need to. Its meaning is obvious (to those who don't have difficulty with English and I'm not addressing anyone else). As a side issue, you ought to get a dictionary and look up the meaning of the word "compare". It seems that you regard it a word which can used indiscriminately without regard either to its meaning or the immediate context. As ever, wriggling out takes more words than to explain. Please quote this "comparison" you complained of. In English, of course. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Cars in future could be brought to standstill if driver gets tooangry
On 23/09/2019 16:15, JNugent wrote:
On 23/09/2019 15:45, TMS320 wrote: On 23/09/2019 13:12, JNugent wrote: On 23/09/2019 11:41, TMS320 wrote: On 23/09/2019 00:34, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 15:26, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:33, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:25, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:03, TMS320 wrote: On 21/09/2019 15:19, JNugent wrote: [Devices which sense the extent of a driver's irritation or anger and are capable of limiting the vehicle's operation as an amelioration method.] Those would be very useful if they could be adapted for compulsory use by those permanently-angry urban cyclists Â*constantly on the lookout for the opportunity for a fight with... well, with just about anyone, really. It has recently been established that you just make this up. Pity there are no spittle sensors on your computer. Denial... never a good tactic. It's a valid response to your allegation. Up to you to prove it. You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else. How do you know what other people think? The people I'm referring to give no signs of doing much thinking. You compared me to everybody else. I am the only one that thinks? Well, that's kind of you. I didn't compare you to anybody or anything. Then you should be able to explain (in English, please) what this means- "You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else." Of course I could. But I don't need to. Its meaning is obvious (to those who don't have difficulty with English and I'm not addressing anyone else). As a side issue, you ought to get a dictionary and look up the meaning of the word "compare". It seems that you regard it a word which can used indiscriminately without regard either to its meaning or the immediate context. As ever, wriggling out takes more words than to explain. Please quote this "comparison" you complained of. In English, of course. First, explain your sentence. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Cars in future could be brought to standstill if driver gets tooangry
On 23/09/2019 16:26, TMS320 wrote:
On 23/09/2019 16:15, JNugent wrote: On 23/09/2019 15:45, TMS320 wrote: On 23/09/2019 13:12, JNugent wrote: On 23/09/2019 11:41, TMS320 wrote: On 23/09/2019 00:34, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 15:26, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:33, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:25, TMS320 wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote: On 22/09/2019 14:03, TMS320 wrote: On 21/09/2019 15:19, JNugent wrote: [Devices which sense the extent of a driver's irritation or anger and are capable of limiting the vehicle's operation as an amelioration method.] Those would be very useful if they could be adapted for compulsory use by those permanently-angry urban cyclists Â*constantly on the lookout for the opportunity for a fight with... well, with just about anyone, really. It has recently been established that you just make this up. Pity there are no spittle sensors on your computer. Denial... never a good tactic. It's a valid response to your allegation. Up to you to prove it. You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else. How do you know what other people think? The people I'm referring to give no signs of doing much thinking. You compared me to everybody else. I am the only one that thinks? Well, that's kind of you. I didn't compare you to anybody or anything. Then you should be able to explain (in English, please) what this means- "You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does everyone else." Of course I could. But I don't need to. Its meaning is obvious (to those who don't have difficulty with English and I'm not addressing anyone else). As a side issue, you ought to get a dictionary and look up the meaning of the word "compare". It seems that you regard it a word which can used indiscriminately without regard either to its meaning or the immediate context. As ever, wriggling out takes more words than to explain. Please quote this "comparison" you complained of. In English, of course. First, explain your sentence. Which one? Asking that does not mean that I consent to either explaining or re-wording a sentence written in plain everyday English. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Driver struck by TWO cars | James Wilkinson Sword[_4_] | UK | 4 | February 6th 17 09:38 AM |
Alfine planetary gearbox and rotation lag from standstill | jk[_2_] | Techniques | 4 | June 7th 11 08:46 PM |
Brought My Unicycle to School! | e39m5 | Unicycling | 27 | June 16th 05 01:11 AM |
Name of Tiregrab Standstill? | UNIquelyCanadian | Unicycling | 14 | April 6th 05 03:45 AM |
Would the IOC have ever brought this up if........... | crit pro | Racing | 9 | September 25th 04 06:35 AM |