Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys

"S o r n i" writes:

Bill Z. wrote:
"S o r n i" writes:

You replied to Dick Durbin under MY reply, and didn't snip your
****ing holy newsreader's automatic attribution (which in this case
said "Sorni says:").

Minor wording aside, what I posted said "Sorni says that Durbin says:"
The attribution is clear to anyone with half a brain. By suppressing
the "Durbin says" portion of it, you are willfully distorting what
was actually said, which makes you dishonest, since it is obviously
not being done by accident.

Now you ARE lying. Anyone can read the original posts and judge for
themselves.

Now you've lied twice. First you said you would not reply again. Now
you are trying to cover up your lies. The original in fact said

+ Sorni wrote:
+ Durbin wrote:
+ ....
+ ....

It is very clear that you are lying through your teeth about what
was actually posted. The meaning was perfectly clear to anyone but
a complete and utter idiot, regardless of whether the first level of
quotes could have been snipped (which is style, not substance.)

Bill "would take a lot more than YOUR immature whining to make me
froth at the keyboard" S.

Then I take it your colorful language is do to precisely what
emotional problem?

The word is "due", moron. And you question MY ability to understand
English.

Oooooooooooooh. Little Sorni is upset about a typo.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

Bill Z. wrote:
"S o r n i" writes:


Bill Z. wrote:

"S o r n i" writes:

You replied to Dick Durbin under MY reply, and didn't snip your
****ing holy newsreader's automatic attribution (which in this case
said "Sorni says:").

Minor wording aside, what I posted said "Sorni says that Durbin says:"
The attribution is clear to anyone with half a brain. By suppressing
the "Durbin says" portion of it, you are willfully distorting what
was actually said, which makes you dishonest, since it is obviously
not being done by accident.

Now you ARE lying. Anyone can read the original posts and judge for
themselves.


Now you've lied twice. First you said you would not reply again. Now
you are trying to cover up your lies. The original in fact said

+ Sorni wrote:
+ Durbin wrote:
+ ....
+ ....

It is very clear that you are lying through your teeth about what
was actually posted. The meaning was perfectly clear to anyone but
a complete and utter idiot, regardless of whether the first level of
quotes could have been snipped (which is style, not substance.)


Bill "would take a lot more than YOUR immature whining to make me
froth at the keyboard" S.

Then I take it your colorful language is do to precisely what
emotional problem?

The word is "due", moron. And you question MY ability to understand
English.


Oooooooooooooh. Little Sorni is upset about a typo.

Bill


Hey, putz, you're still in the wrong. Get used to it and act like a man
and admit your error.


jim

JimLane wrote (of poor little Bill Zee):

Hey, putz, you're still in the wrong. Get used to it and act like a
man and admit your error.

I think I'll clean the Stairway to Hell out at Noble Canyon before THAT
happens, Jim.

Bill "bloody (!) unlikely" S.

"I'm never wrong" wrote:
Then I take it your colorful language is do to precisely what
emotional problem?
Sorni replied:
The word is "due", moron. And you question MY ability to understand
English.
"It's not me, it's the whole world" then said:
Oooooooooooooh. Little Sorni is upset about a typo.

You can't even admit that you chose the wrong word when it's 100%
certain that you did.

In a book by Douglas Adams, there's a character named Wonko The Sane
who built his house inside-out. He claimed that what we would call
the inside of his house was actually outside, and the rest of the
world surrounding his house was an asylum. This character believed
that he was right and the whole world wrong, that he was the only
sane one. He had a similar outlook to yours, but was much funnier
(and probably much wiser) than you.
--
Rick Onanian

Rick Onanian wrote:
"I'm never wrong" wrote:
Then I take it your colorful language is do to precisely what
emotional problem?
Sorni replied:
The word is "due", moron. And you question MY ability to understand
English.
"It's not me, it's the whole world" then said:
Oooooooooooooh. Little Sorni is upset about a typo.

You can't even admit that you chose the wrong word when it's 100%
certain that you did.

In a book by Douglas Adams, there's a character named Wonko The Sane
who built his house inside-out. He claimed that what we would call
the inside of his house was actually outside, and the rest of the
world surrounding his house was an asylum. This character believed
that he was right and the whole world wrong, that he was the only
sane one. He had a similar outlook to yours, but was much funnier
(and probably much wiser) than you.

Damn Skippy, that was good! (I wanted to blast him, too, but only had Betty
& Veronica comics to draw upon for inspiration.)

Bill "AKA Jughead" S.

Apparently the same thing happened in wreck tech, and here is what the
"victim" posted:

wle wrote:
David Damerell wrote in message
... [no text quoted from me]

Watch that - don't include attribution lines that don't have corresponding
text.

EXACTLY!!!

Bill "succinct recap" S.

JimLane writes:

Bill Z. wrote:
"S o r n i" writes:

Hey, putz, you're still in the wrong. Get used to it and act like a
man and admit your error.

Hey jerk, the post was neither a misquote nor a misattribution, so
Sorni is lying. If you want to complain about writing style, I could
care less.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

Rick Onanian writes:

"I'm never wrong" wrote:
Then I take it your colorful language is do to precisely what
emotional problem?
Sorni replied:
The word is "due", moron. And you question MY ability to understand
English.
"It's not me, it's the whole world" then said:
Oooooooooooooh. Little Sorni is upset about a typo.

You can't even admit that you chose the wrong word when it's 100%
certain that you did.

Rick, you are you so dumb as to not know what a typo is? Sorni simply
has something up his butt and needs to whine about it. I guess you do
too. Why don't you two get together and help each other out - with
your butt problems, that is.


--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

"S o r n i" writes:

Apparently the same thing happened in wreck tech, and here is what the
"victim" posted:

wle wrote:
David Damerell wrote in message
... [no text quoted from me]

Watch that - don't include attribution lines that don't have corresponding
text.

EXACTLY!!!

Except it *did* have corresponding text. Read the original very
carefully. The text Sorni put in (or at least, his newsreader put in)
said approximately, "Durbin wrote." (I only snipped a 4-word sentence
at the end of his post, and that sentence was content-free.)

The attribution was 100% clear due to the '' quoting convention. So
Sorni lied about the attribution.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

(Bill Z.) writes:

Now you've lied twice.

Actually, Bill, you're being every bit as dishonest as you accuse
Sorni of being. More so in fact, since you're also a troll.

I wish that Sorni and Jim, et al, will take this clue from me:
killfiles are good. Put Bill Z in your killfile, the thread will stop
iommediately, and life goes on. He will be in my killfile from now
on, too.