|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Reasons to suspect Armstrong...
I believe Lance Armstrong is clean. But I understand why people
suspect him: 1) He is so much better than everybody else. 2) Not one bad day in 6 years of Tour de France racing. 3) Connections to alleged dope doctor Ferrari. 4) He is the best in cycling, a tradidionally dope-infested sport. 5) Recent track&field doping scandals have proven that Americans can be just as big cheaters as anyone. 6) Anti-American sentiments the last couple of years. 7) Some surprisingly ungentlemanly behaviour from the gentleman LA, like chasing Simeoni in this year's tour, or cutting across a field after Beloki's accident last year. But, as I said, I think Armstrong is clean. He is just extremely talented, and has an extremely professional attitude to what he is doing. And he is the most dope-tested athlete there is today. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Reasons to suspect Armstrong...
I believe Lance Armstrong is clean. But I understand why people
suspect him: 1) He is so much better than everybody else. 2) Not one bad day in 6 years of Tour de France racing. 3) Connections to alleged dope doctor Ferrari. 4) He is the best in cycling, a tradidionally dope-infested sport. 5) Recent track&field doping scandals have proven that Americans can be just as big cheaters as anyone. 6) Anti-American sentiments the last couple of years. 7) Some surprisingly ungentlemanly behaviour from the gentleman LA, like chasing Simeoni in this year's tour, or cutting across a field after Beloki's accident last year. But, as I said, I think Armstrong is clean. He is just extremely talented, and has an extremely professional attitude to what he is doing. And he is the most dope-tested athlete there is today. 8) Answering "I was never caught" instead of a simple "No" when asked about using doping. "Skuyte Hamrell" wrote in message m... I believe Lance Armstrong is clean. But I understand why people suspect him: 1) He is so much better than everybody else. 2) Not one bad day in 6 years of Tour de France racing. 3) Connections to alleged dope doctor Ferrari. 4) He is the best in cycling, a tradidionally dope-infested sport. 5) Recent track&field doping scandals have proven that Americans can be just as big cheaters as anyone. 6) Anti-American sentiments the last couple of years. 7) Some surprisingly ungentlemanly behaviour from the gentleman LA, like chasing Simeoni in this year's tour, or cutting across a field after Beloki's accident last year. But, as I said, I think Armstrong is clean. He is just extremely talented, and has an extremely professional attitude to what he is doing. And he is the most dope-tested athlete there is today. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Reasons to suspect Armstrong...
Skuyte Hamrell wrote:
or cutting across a field after Beloki's accident last year. ??? avioding a crash at all possible cost is ungentlemanly ??? did you see the footage or did you read about it in an online report? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Reasons to suspect Armstrong...
Ronald Wrote: I believe Lance Armstrong is clean. But I understand why people suspect him: 8) Answering "I was never caught" instead of a simple "No" when asked about using doping. . Yes he was caught. Corticoid steroid used TOPICALLY for saddle sore AND PERMITTED by UCI and race officials. And Lance HAS used EPO. After his chemo, his Hcrt dropped to 26 and the doctors used it withing FDA approved procedures to rebuild his endurance. -- Weisse Luft |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Reasons to suspect Armstrong...
I have heard him so "no". I am not defending or accusing. Just giving facts.
Race "Ronald" wrote in message ... I believe Lance Armstrong is clean. But I understand why people suspect him: 1) He is so much better than everybody else. 2) Not one bad day in 6 years of Tour de France racing. 3) Connections to alleged dope doctor Ferrari. 4) He is the best in cycling, a tradidionally dope-infested sport. 5) Recent track&field doping scandals have proven that Americans can be just as big cheaters as anyone. 6) Anti-American sentiments the last couple of years. 7) Some surprisingly ungentlemanly behaviour from the gentleman LA, like chasing Simeoni in this year's tour, or cutting across a field after Beloki's accident last year. But, as I said, I think Armstrong is clean. He is just extremely talented, and has an extremely professional attitude to what he is doing. And he is the most dope-tested athlete there is today. 8) Answering "I was never caught" instead of a simple "No" when asked about using doping. "Skuyte Hamrell" wrote in message m... I believe Lance Armstrong is clean. But I understand why people suspect him: 1) He is so much better than everybody else. 2) Not one bad day in 6 years of Tour de France racing. 3) Connections to alleged dope doctor Ferrari. 4) He is the best in cycling, a tradidionally dope-infested sport. 5) Recent track&field doping scandals have proven that Americans can be just as big cheaters as anyone. 6) Anti-American sentiments the last couple of years. 7) Some surprisingly ungentlemanly behaviour from the gentleman LA, like chasing Simeoni in this year's tour, or cutting across a field after Beloki's accident last year. But, as I said, I think Armstrong is clean. He is just extremely talented, and has an extremely professional attitude to what he is doing. And he is the most dope-tested athlete there is today. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Reasons to suspect Armstrong...
or cutting across a field
after Beloki's accident last year. What does that have to do with your argument? Race "Skuyte Hamrell" wrote in message m... I believe Lance Armstrong is clean. But I understand why people suspect him: 1) He is so much better than everybody else. 2) Not one bad day in 6 years of Tour de France racing. 3) Connections to alleged dope doctor Ferrari. 4) He is the best in cycling, a tradidionally dope-infested sport. 5) Recent track&field doping scandals have proven that Americans can be just as big cheaters as anyone. 6) Anti-American sentiments the last couple of years. 7) Some surprisingly ungentlemanly behaviour from the gentleman LA, like chasing Simeoni in this year's tour, or cutting across a field after Beloki's accident last year. But, as I said, I think Armstrong is clean. He is just extremely talented, and has an extremely professional attitude to what he is doing. And he is the most dope-tested athlete there is today. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Reasons to suspect Armstrong...
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Reasons *not* to suspect Armstrong...
"Race Bannon" a écrit dans le message de :
... I have heard him so "no". I am not defending or accusing. Just giving facts. Race You got it !! That is a good fact, that he said those words. Beginning to balance Brian Lafferty, at last. Now, can't some of you come up with other facts ? Not opinions, or interpretations, or adulations. Then we can find equilibrium, or get closer. Here's a fact to add, or so I believe : Armstrong has never tested positive in official testing for a banned substance, unless he had a medical authorization to use it. (I'm just covering for myself - I can't be sure any longer what has been distorted by variation and repetition.) Someone, quick, start a list ! -- Sandy Paris FR ******* La vie, c'est comme une bicyclette, il faut avancer pour ne pas perdre l'équilibre. -- Einstein, A. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Reasons to suspect Armstrong...
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Reasons to suspect Armstrong...
"Skuyte Hamrell" wrote in message m... I believe Lance Armstrong is clean. But I understand why people suspect him: 1) He is so much better than everybody else. 2) Not one bad day in 6 years of Tour de France racing. Yeah, you are right. Not "one bad day" but he has had about a half dozen bad days all tolled. Starting back in 2000 when he bonked during the final climb one day, then there are numerous ITT losses and several other bad days in the mountains when he was able to bluff his way to the finish and keep the damage manageable. I guess he fools a lot of fans in to thinking he is invincible too. If he can fool his peers, he can fool you too. He does not have to be perfect to win, only better than the rest for typically 21 days of racing combined per year. 3) Connections to alleged dope doctor Ferrari. 4) He is the best in cycling, a tradidionally dope-infested sport. No, not the best. He is the best at the Tour when there are the most people looking. 5) Recent track&field doping scandals have proven that Americans can be just as big cheaters as anyone. People are people. 6) Anti-American sentiments the last couple of years. 7) Some surprisingly ungentlemanly behaviour from the gentleman LA, like chasing Simeoni in this year's tour, or cutting across a field after Beloki's accident last year. But, as I said, I think Armstrong is clean. He is just extremely talented, and has an extremely professional attitude to what he is doing. And he is the most dope-tested athlete there is today. Yeah well, what was your point again? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Armstrong Business Model | Richard Longwood | Racing | 6 | February 28th 04 01:22 AM |
Doping or not? Read this: | never_doped | Racing | 0 | August 4th 03 01:46 AM |