|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is André Aubut tapping Geneviève Jeanson?
My sources say yes.
Was this going on when GJ was a minor, too? What does Canadian law say about pedophiles? crit PRO |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
My sources say yes.
Was this going on when GJ was a minor, too? What does Canadian law say about pedophiles? I'm sure it'll end up being a murder suicide, so who cares. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"crit pro" wrote in message om... My sources say yes. crit PRO My sources say that might very well be true. I guess the fruits of his labor. So what if they love each other, but from what I can tell, maybe they had a falling out. I wish she would move to France so I can see how she stacks up against the big guns in Europe. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
(crit pro) wrote in message . com...
My sources say yes. Was this going on when GJ was a minor, too? What does Canadian law say about pedophiles? crit PRO http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/li...s/prb993-e.htm "The Criminal Code does not now criminalize consensual sexual activity with or between persons 14 or over, unless it takes place in a relationship of trust or dependency, in which case sexual activity with persons over 14 but under 18 can constitute an offence, notwithstanding their consent. Even consensual activity with those under 14 but over 12 may not be an offence if the accused is under 16 and less than two years older than the complainant. The exception, of course, is anal intercourse, to which unmarried persons under 18 cannot legally consent, although both the Ontario Court of Appeal(3) and the Quebec Court of Appeal(4) have struck down the relevant section of the Criminal Code." also this : "the "seduction" of a female under 18 "under promise of marriage" was made an offence in Canada in 1886 and amended in 1887 to apply to females under 21. In 1920, the offence of "seduction" (without reference to promise of marriage) was made applicable to girls "of previously chaste character" between 16 and 18." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 10 Oct 2004 22:57:56 -0700, Amit wrote:
http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/li...s/prb993-e.htm "The Criminal Code does not now criminalize consensual sexual activity with or between persons 14 or over, unless it takes place in a relationship of trust or dependency, in which case sexual activity with persons over 14 but under 18 can constitute an offence, notwithstanding their consent. [...] Like so many things Canadian, except Davey; sounds reasonable. As a (rowing) coach, I am strongly opposed to coach-pupil relationships. Complete abuse of trust and dependence. Sometimes I wish I would lighten up, though. http://www.nlroei.nl/Fotoboek-display-1157.html Cheerio, Francis -- Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://www.getffox.com/ Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://www.gettbird.com/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What does Canadian law say about pedophiles?
crit PRO http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/li...s/prb993-e.htm "The Criminal Code does not now criminalize consensual sexual activity with or between persons 14 or over, unless it takes place in a relationship of trust or dependency, in which case sexual activity with persons over 14 but under 18 can constitute an offence, Jeanson's 23. Aubut's about 50, I think. M Man |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Ewoud Dronkert wrote: Sometimes I wish I would lighten up, though. http://www.nlroei.nl/Fotoboek-display-1157.html Cheerio, Francis Francis, Given your expertise AS a rowing coach, can you please enlighten us as to what the man is doing in the picture on the left? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Jeanson's 23. Aubut's about 50, I think. For people who have actually seen them together, if you didn't know who they were, does it look like Father, Daughter when they are next to each other? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jeanson and her skeptics | Sierraman | Racing | 4 | July 7th 04 01:02 AM |