OFF TOPIC FUN - The TROLL, Rear-ended

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 20:37:49 -0700 (PDT), JimmyMac
wrote:

On Apr 5, 9:23 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:43:40 -0700 (PDT), JimmyMac



wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:15 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:30:45 -0700 (PDT), JimmyMac

wrote:
On Apr 4, 3:14 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:33:37 -0700 (PDT), JimmyMac

wrote:
On Apr 3, 10:56 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 06:22:44 -0700 (PDT), JimmyMac

wrote:
Your repetitive gushy affection for Ed is telling and embarrassing.
Haven't you got a pipe dream habitat to work on? Perhaps you and
Dolan can get a group rate from a therapist.

All you need to worry about is explaining why you deliberately LIED
being an incorrigible LIAR isn't sufficient explanation):

Who is the liar here if the vague pronoun reference is to me to imply
that I posted this.

Sorry, I didn't read the name carefully. It was Walter Skrzypek
. You lie about OTHER things.

Not a revelation really ... being two of a kind,

See, there's a lie.

Pray tell where?

In denial? "being two of a kind"

Don't over-exert yourself. Characteristic of the beast ... one-liner
Mike is a man of few words ... word that reflect how his cerebral
shortcomings. Two of a kind? Many here have made the observation
that you and Dolan are two of a king. I merely echoed the sentiment
of the many.

A lie is a lie, regardless of whether anyone else said it also.

I trust that I spelled that out in such a way that it
did not escape your poor powers of perception.

like Ed Dolan you

made an uncorroborated assertion.

No, more like a typo. I know you didn't say that.

Care to substantiate your

allegation with a few examples of these alleged OTHER things that I
have lied about

See above. See how easy you guys are?

See what above. Care to be more specific?

or when challenged to do so will you choose to emulateEd Dolan and either go mute or offer up a diversion?

How will your good bud overlook your atrocious formatting in your
response?

I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help?

Since you asked ... No!

(I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Goodie ... goodie for you

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 19:09:09 -0700 (PDT), JimmyMac
wrote:

On Apr 6, 2:56 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

... On Apr 5, 9:23 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:43:40 -0700 (PDT), JimmyMac

[...]

See, there's a lie.

Pray tell where?

In denial? "being two of a kind"

Don't over-exert yourself. Characteristic of the beast ... one-liner
Mike is a man of few words ... word that reflect how his cerebral
shortcomings. Two of a kind? Many here have made the observation
that you and Dolan are two of a kind. I merely echoed the sentiment
of the many. I trust that I spelled that out in such a way that it
did not escape your poor powers of perception.

JimmyMac is a man of many words, but they never add up to anything. They
didn't with Ed Gin (when the two of them were having their spat on Usenet
some years ago) and they don't today when he has become a stalker who
resorts to sexual innuendo, ever the last refuge of a scoundrel. Poor
JimmyMac is in over his head and hasn't a clue about how to handle anyone
other than to go on and on with a lot of meaningless insinuations and
accusations hoping to exhaust his adversaries from the sheer exasperation of
it all. He is more to be pitied than condemned. I really feel for his poor,
long-suffering wife!

I was speaking (writing) to Mike not to you, but customarily you tow
come to each others defense the only two who consistently do so I
might add. Could that possibly be the source of insinuation? Count
the words and you will note that your response exceeded comments.
Even Mike could have surpassed your incoherent babble with one of his
one-liners. Continuing to refer to my wife as long-suffering dosen't
make her so. Repeating something makes it no more true or valid than
with the first fallacious uternace, but hey repetition ad nauseum is
the best you can manage to muster, so I understand, but why accuse me
of hoping to exhaust an adversary from the sheer exasperation? That
is you specialty. No one will ever accuse you of being reasonable or
even rational ... well maybe M.V.

Ed is pure poetry. I know you'll never understand that.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande