|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Smirking driver records himself braking deliberately to make cyclistcrash into him
A driver brazenly filmed the moment he slammed on the brakes, throwing
an innocent cyclist into the back of his car. https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/22/smirk...2/?ito=cbshare -- Bod --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Smirking driver records himself braking deliberately to make cyclist crash into him
Bod wrote:
A driver brazenly filmed the moment he slammed on the brakes, throwing an innocent cyclist into the back of his car. https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/22/smirk...2/?ito=cbshare Okay, you are fishing for replies. "A driver brazenly filmed the moment he slammed on the brakes, throwing an *innocent* cyclist into the back of his car" Nope. "The footage starts with the smirking driver spotting the cyclist traveling along a pavement at speed before he veers into the road behind his car" So not innocent then. The driver braked suddenly. Drivers are allowed to do this. The cyclist was too close to the proper road vehicle to stop. The driver did not throw the cyclist in to his car, the cyclist rode in to the car. "The cyclist, who is not wearing a helmet and appears to be close behind the car, crashes into the rear window, smashing the glass". So, not so innocent then. The driver will probably be insured for the damaged caused by the cyclist. Will the cyclist be insured? Answers on a postage stamp. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Smirking driver records himself braking deliberately to makecyclist crash into him
On 22/03/2019 14:48, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"The footage starts with the smirking driver spotting the cyclist traveling along a pavement at speed before he veers into the road behind his car" So not innocent then. Drivers have no remit to act as court and executioner. Pedestrian casualty figures show drivers are the biggest hypocrites around if they try to act as the "pedestrian's friend". The driver will probably be insured for the damaged caused by the cyclist. Will the cyclist be insured? Answers on a postage stamp. It would be interesting to see what he writes down in a claim. If he puts in a claim, at least he will have to pay an excess and higher premiums for a few years. If he doesn't claim, will he lie about his record when he renews? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Smirking driver records himself braking deliberately to makecyclist crash into him
On 22/03/2019 15:39, TMS320 wrote:
On 22/03/2019 14:48, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: "The footage starts with the smirking driver spotting the cyclist traveling along a pavement at speed before he veers into the road behind his car" So not innocent then. Drivers have no remit to act as court and executioner. Pedestrian casualty figures show drivers are the biggest hypocrites around if they try to act as the "pedestrian's friend". The driver will probably be insured for the damaged caused by the cyclist. Will the cyclist be insured? Answers on a postage stamp. It would be interesting to see what he writes down in a claim. If he puts in a claim, at least he will have to pay an excess and higher premiums for a few years. If he doesn't claim, will he lie about his record when he renews? The driver is on film as virtually admitting that he caused the crash deliberately. I doubt that even the driver's insurance company would pay out after watching the video. I also doubt that a court of law would find the cyclist liable after watching the video and possibly even judge that compensation is due to the cyclist. -- Bod --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Smirking driver records himself braking deliberately to makecyclist crash into him
On 22/03/2019 14:48, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Bod wrote: A driver brazenly filmed the moment he slammed on the brakes, throwing an innocent cyclist into the back of his car. https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/22/smirk...2/?ito=cbshare Okay, you are fishing for replies. "A driver brazenly filmed the moment he slammed on the brakes, throwing an *innocent* cyclist into the back of his car" Nope. "The footage starts with the smirking driver spotting the cyclist traveling along a pavement at speed before he veers into the road behind his car" So not innocent then. The driver braked suddenly. Drivers are allowed to do this. The cyclist was too close to the proper road vehicle to stop. The driver did not throw the cyclist in to his car, the cyclist rode in to the car. "The cyclist, who is not wearing a helmet and appears to be close behind the car, crashes into the rear window, smashing the glass". So, not so innocent then. The driver will probably be insured for the damaged caused by the cyclist. Will the cyclist be insured? Answers on a postage stamp. Perhaps the cyclist will learn from his mistake, but I doubt it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Smirking driver records himself braking deliberately to makecyclist crash into him
On 22/03/2019 16:18, Bod wrote:
I also doubt that a court of law would find the cyclist liable after watching the video and possibly even judge that compensation is due to the cyclist. The video doesn't show what's in front of the car, so we don't know why the driver braked. Doing so *for the purpose* of causing harm to the cyclist is possibly ABH/GBH. If the cyclist had been killed, it might have been murder. However, proving the driver's intent might be difficult, and in the ordinary course of events it's up to the vehicle behind to leave sufficient space to stop. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Smirking driver records himself braking deliberately to makecyclist crash into him
On Friday, March 22, 2019 at 10:52:28 AM UTC, Bod wrote:
A driver brazenly filmed the moment he slammed on the brakes, throwing an innocent cyclist into the back of his car. https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/22/smirk...2/?ito=cbshare Fake video, the cyclist was not wearing a helmet therefore could not have survived. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Smirking driver records himself braking deliberately to makecyclist crash into him
On Friday, March 22, 2019 at 2:48:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Bod wrote: A driver brazenly filmed the moment he slammed on the brakes, throwing an innocent cyclist into the back of his car. https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/22/smirk...2/?ito=cbshare Okay, you are fishing for replies. "A driver brazenly filmed the moment he slammed on the brakes, throwing an *innocent* cyclist into the back of his car" Nope. "The footage starts with the smirking driver spotting the cyclist traveling along a pavement at speed before he veers into the road behind his car" So not innocent then. The driver braked suddenly. Drivers are allowed to do this. The cyclist was too close to the proper road vehicle to stop. The driver did not throw the cyclist in to his car, the cyclist rode in to the car. "The cyclist, who is not wearing a helmet and appears to be close behind the car, crashes into the rear window, smashing the glass". So, not so innocent then. The driver will probably be insured for the damaged caused by the cyclist. Will the cyclist be insured? Answers on a postage stamp. What penalty has the driver received for using a phone whilst driving snd attempted murder? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Smirking driver records himself braking deliberately to make cyclist crash into him
GB wrote:
On 22/03/2019 16:18, Bod wrote: I also doubt that a court of law would find the cyclist liable after watching the video and possibly even judge that compensation is due to the cyclist. The video doesn't show what's in front of the car, so we don't know why the driver braked. Doing so *for the purpose* of causing harm to the cyclist is possibly ABH/GBH. If the cyclist had been killed, it might have been murder. However, proving the driver's intent might be difficult, and in the ordinary course of events it's up to the vehicle behind to leave sufficient space to stop. Yes. As a bicycle is a road vehicle, you are quite correct sir. But cyclists are far too stupid to understand this. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Smirking driver records himself braking deliberately to makecyclist crash into him
On Friday, March 22, 2019 at 5:43:54 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
GB wrote: On 22/03/2019 16:18, Bod wrote: I also doubt that a court of law would find the cyclist liable after watching the video and possibly even judge that compensation is due to the cyclist. The video doesn't show what's in front of the car, so we don't know why the driver braked. Doing so *for the purpose* of causing harm to the cyclist is possibly ABH/GBH. If the cyclist had been killed, it might have been murder. However, proving the driver's intent might be difficult, and in the ordinary course of events it's up to the vehicle behind to leave sufficient space to stop. Yes. As a bicycle is a road vehicle, you are quite correct sir. But cyclists are far too stupid to understand this. After extensive research I have finally figured out Mr Pounders problem. As an infant his mother accidentally embedded a chisel into his soft skull and at the time there was no way to remove it. This meant his brain could not fully mature. Now medical science has advanced the chisel could be removed but it would destroy what little brain function he has left. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Audi driver ‘deliberately aims car at cyclist at speed in road rage | Bod[_5_] | UK | 2 | August 6th 18 07:56 PM |
Driver deliberately swerved into cyclist in revenge for ‘hand gesture | Bod[_5_] | UK | 7 | December 21st 17 12:12 AM |
Driver who deliberately ploughed into clubbers while high on drinkand drugs has sentence cut | Bod[_5_] | UK | 1 | August 13th 16 09:30 PM |
Taxi driver deliberately runs cyclist off the road | Alycidon | UK | 61 | December 16th 15 06:29 PM |
Driver deliberately turns into cyclist and causing cyclist to crash | Bod[_5_] | UK | 6 | October 27th 15 05:26 PM |