A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Mountain Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

WHOOPS: more science mike won't like



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 8th 13, 11:18 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
I love Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 332
Default WHOOPS: more science mike won't like

http://atfiles.org/files/pdf/Mountai...west-white.pdf


Key conclusion:

The findings from this study reinforce results from previous research that certain impacts to mountain bike trails, especially width, are compa- rable or less than hiking or multiple-use trails, and significantly less than impacts to equestrian or off-highway vehicle trails.

Note:

Data for the study were collected from 319 sample points gathered from 162.3 miles of mountain bike trails in five common ecological regions of the southwest United States.
Ads
  #2  
Old August 8th 13, 02:40 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike
Mike Vandeman[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,755
Default WHOOPS: more science mike won't like

On Thursday, August 8, 2013 3:18:53 AM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote:
http://atfiles.org/files/pdf/Mountai...west-white.pdf





Key conclusion:



The findings from this study reinforce results from previous research that certain impacts to mountain bike trails, especially width, are compa- rable or less than hiking or multiple-use trails, and significantly less than impacts to equestrian or off-highway vehicle trails.



Note:



Data for the study were collected from 319 sample points gathered from 162.3 miles of mountain bike trails in five common ecological regions of the southwest United States.


Junk science. Not worth the paper it's printed on. Not that you would know the difference.
  #3  
Old August 8th 13, 03:15 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike
Blackblade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 274
Default WHOOPS: more science mike won't like

On Thursday, August 8, 2013 2:40:12 PM UTC+1, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Thursday, August 8, 2013 3:18:53 AM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote:

http://atfiles.org/files/pdf/Mountai...west-white.pdf












Key conclusion:








The findings from this study reinforce results from previous research that certain impacts to mountain bike trails, especially width, are compa- rable or less than hiking or multiple-use trails, and significantly less than impacts to equestrian or off-highway vehicle trails.








Note:








Data for the study were collected from 319 sample points gathered from 162.3 miles of mountain bike trails in five common ecological regions of the southwest United States.




Junk science. Not worth the paper it's printed on. Not that you would know the difference.


Nor would you ... as a promulgator of non-peer-reviewed, non-factually-verified and opinion-based pieces. Talk about hypocrisy.
  #4  
Old August 8th 13, 06:53 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike
I love Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 332
Default WHOOPS: more science mike won't like

Hahaha. Well said.
  #5  
Old August 8th 13, 07:10 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike
I love Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 332
Default WHOOPS: more science mike won't like

Whatever Vandeman
  #6  
Old August 9th 13, 08:48 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
I love Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 332
Default WHOOPS: more science mike won't like

And your evidence for saying its junk science? Why don't you write an article in the journal in response? That's what real scientists do when they disagree with research.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whoops!! atriage[_6_] Racing 0 October 20th 11 11:27 PM
Whoops, take two [email protected] Racing 0 September 14th 07 03:57 AM
Whoops [email protected] Racing 2 August 26th 07 03:11 PM
Whoops! I done it again! Paul Boyd UK 0 June 25th 06 06:58 PM
Mike Murray - See Blood Thinner Question Below - Mike Murray White Courtesy Phone - Calling Mike Murray, M.D. Leave It To Beaver Racing 0 April 13th 05 04:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.