THE MEIN KAMPF OF THE GLOBAL WARMING GENOCIDE

If 220,000,000 murders, and counting, were necessary to ban DDT, how
many billion will be the 'few necessary murders' of global warming?

And who will those few billion murdered by anti-global warming
measures be?

Here are a few extracts from the MEIN KAMPF of the next genocide:

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100
million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see
wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout
the world.”
--Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

“The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.”
-- Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from
present levels, would be ideal.”
-- Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

„A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the
present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion.
At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would
be possible.“
-- United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment

„In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000
people per day.“
-- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier

Osama bin Laden never dreamed such dreams of genocide...

Andre Jute
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea
that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine
and the like would fit the bill.” -- Club of Rome, The First Global
Revolution

* Still Just Me * wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:20:40 -0800 (PST), Andre Jute
wrote:

If 220,000,000 murders, and counting, were necessary to ban DDT, how
many billion will be the 'few necessary murders' of global warming?

And who will those few billion murdered by anti-global warming
measures be?

Here are a few extracts from the MEIN KAMPF of the next genocide:

Surely even a moron like you isn't stupid enough to take a few
statements from radical groups/individuals, or others which are
totally out if context, and suggest they represent everyone concerned
about Global Warming?

Or are you?

It's "performance art". Whoa!

Andre Jute:
If 220,000,000 murders, and counting, were necessary to ban DDT, how
many billion will be the 'few necessary murders' of global warming?

And who will those few billion murdered by anti-global warming
measures be?

Here are a few extracts from the MEIN KAMPF of the next genocide:

Still-Just-Me:
Surely even a moron like you isn't stupid enough to take a few
statements from radical groups/individuals, or others which are
totally out if context, and suggest they represent everyone concerned
about Global Warming?

Or are you?

Richard P Leavitt aka RichL
It's "performance art". *Whoa!

Well, let's see who those "radical groups/individuals" in the
"performance art" are.

Here are a few extracts from the MEIN KAMPF of the next genocide:

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100
million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see
wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning
throughout
the world.”
--Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

Okay, anyone who belongs to some nutwing organization called "Earth
First!" (with an exclamation!) is clearly a fruitcake with several
nuts spinning loose. Real people belong to humanity, which puts people
first. Dave Foreman is clearly a genocidal maniac in the making -- and
proud of it.

“The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.”
-- Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point

Actually, the Club of Rome for years counted Maurice Strong, founder
of the IPCC among its executive members. The great and the good of
officialdom are members. (If they were ever to let you through their
plush portal, Lord Valve, you will most assuredly fall down dead of
instant trauma caused by socialist overload in the very air they
exhale. Never mind the neatly parted grey hair and the expensive
suits, these are leftover marxists.) Good old Morrie is the main man
of you global warmies, so if you want to call him the fruti-tuti di
capo tuti, and his institution a radical nuthouse group, that's all
right by me -- I'll graciously permit it.

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from
present levels, would be ideal.”
-- Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

Ted Turner is an American self-made billionaire and the last time I
spoke to him he was deputy chairman of Time-Warner, the second largest
media group in the world, who just happen to count among my
publishers. So we'd better not call him a radical nutcase or it could
interfere with the ease of my old age in various agreeable no-tax
regimes. Basically Mr Turner is a suit, no relation to Osama bin
Laden, not a nutcase by any stretch of the imagination, just a smart
businessman; global warming scares are no doubt a boon to his
business.

„A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the
present North American material standard of living would be 1
billion.
At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would
be possible.“
-- United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment

The United Nations is the top echelon of international
intergovernmental co-operation and the "owner" of the IPCC. If you two
loudmouths want to call the UN a radical group ready for the
straitjacket, who am I to argue with such experts as the pseudonymous
"Still Just Me" (a blustering idiot) and Richard P Leavitt (SJM's
nincompoop chorus). The experts have spoken: the UN is a "radical
group".

„In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000
people per day.“
-- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier

Oh yeah, of course he's a radical fruitcake: his limmo once ran over a
girl who knew a guy whose brother was on a leftie college paper twenty
years ago.

Osama bin Laden is Richard P Leavitt's rabbi...

You two morons curl me up with laughter: you're so ignorant, you don't
even understand that the IPCC, whom you're trying to protect against
the crimes of its footsoldiers, was born in the bloody Club of Rome
and belongs to the UN which you twice condemned.

God, you global warmies are tenth-rate.

Andre Jute
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea
that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine
and the like would fit the bill.” -- Club of Rome, The First Global
Revolution

On Dec 15, 9:20*am, Andre Jute wrote:
If 220,000,000 murders, and counting, were necessary to ban DDT, how
many billion will be the 'few necessary murders' of global warming?

And who will those few billion murdered by anti-global warming
measures be?

Here are a few extracts from the MEIN KAMPF of the next genocide:

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100
million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see
wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout
the world.”
--Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

Don't worry Andre, someone will shoot Dave first before the others.

“The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.”
-- Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point

Again, no need to worry about such value statements.

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from
present levels, would be ideal.”
-- Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

Then he could corner a market and build things back up when he becmes
a dicktator.
He'd have rather a lot of opposition.....

„A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the
present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion.
At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would
be possible.“
-- United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment

Again there are too many ppl in the way to worry about this idea.

„In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000
people per day.“
-- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier

There's a mob outside and they wanna start with Jacques....

Osama bin Laden never dreamed such dreams of genocide...

Andre Jute
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea
that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine
and the like would fit the bill.” -- Club of Rome, The First Global
Revolution

Don't let hot nights keep you awake in summertime.

Of course nobody knows how we'll cope in the year 3009 when there are
30 billion on the planet but I'm told McDonalds is looking forward to
that day.

I'm sure there are millions of other planets in the observable
universe with life or maybe life has been and gone. And I'm sure many
planets have had crowd control bothers, or will have them, or have
them now which would mean they would have to think of a way to survive
against plagues, shortages, temperatures, etc, etc, etc, not to
mention troubles with politicians only thinking 10 years ahead, and
demographics experts telling ppl bull****.

And maybe this universe is a mere pimple on God's nose, and the rest
of the body of God and the world and universe in which God lives is
just a pimple on a larger God's nose, and so on until 10 raised to an
infinite number.......

But while you consider the authors you mention above and their
unlikely solutions, consider a world in maybe 3009 where Ireland is 5C
average hotter, and food production falls to 20% of what it is now but
there are 3 times the ppl to feed, and oil has risen to 4 times the
price it is now, and sea levels have risen a metre or two.
People are like rats and when you have a sufficient number in too
small a space then fighting and disease tend to break out and the
numbers are culled. Nuclear war would be a great culler of all
species, and the genetic mutations which might follow such a war may
not necessarily lead more co-operative types to breed better than
those who just fight.

The future is frightfully un-predictable, and God won't tell us who
else to contact to advice.

Patrick Turner.

On Dec 15, 12:36*pm, Andre Jute wrote:
snip bits and peices.....

God, you global warmies are tenth-rate.

Well, lookin at how all the Warmies are communicating in Copenhagen,
I'd tend to agree.

But meanwhile the ice in the world continues to melt and glaciers
retreat and average temps are on the rise despite the Coolies saying
its a'coolin justa bit now.......

The biggest company running the NSW ski resort at Perisher Valley in
NSW is worried it will soon have to spend 40 million bucks on an
enormous expansion of artificial snow making machinery during the next
decade or else it risks going broke because ppl won't want to ski.
That company, like many others, know warming is happening.

The whole trouble with Warming is that it is creeping up on us way too
slow. We are getting use to it as it warms. Nothing seems odd. Sky is
still blue, birds sing songs in trees outside, the grass is green,
well, in springtime at least anyway. Warming is an idea that was
designed to be denied. And getting stoinkingly rich appeals to most
people much more than moping about all gloomy over boring
temperatures; and when ppl do get rich ppl just buy a bigger air con
to be comfy, problem solved.

I reckon if a decent hurricane blew the whole state of NY into the
Atlantic, maybe ppl would act, or if sea levels rose a metre by
Easter, or if their supermarkets put up their prices 100% in 6mths
because of food shortages. Bible sales would rise though, despite
bible price rises......

The other trouble with Warming is that although we here now will
aclimatise to the changes, maybe billions of future ppl won't be able
to so easily - whatever the causes of the warming. Warming is a bit
like cancer. If you detect cancer early enough, maybe you can save a
person with action. But cancer is not always able to be stopped
despite the medical bills people pay for treatment. So getting people
to invest in the cost of anti-warming measures as a form of insurance
is extremely difficult considering most people in the world don't know
what an insurance policy and premium is, and when **** happens in
their lives they just suffer and/or perish without any help.

Mein Got, I will soon get the Nobel Prize for Being Avidly Depressed,
the nobel BAD award.......

But I still like triodes and bicycles.

Patrick Turner.

Patrick Turner wrote:

But meanwhile the ice in the world continues to melt and glaciers
retreat and average temps are on the rise despite the Coolies saying
its a'coolin justa bit now.......

Within our lifetimes, it will be weather and not temperature that will
get our attention. One degree warmer feels the same to us as one
degree cooler, but that one degree represents a stupendous amount of
energy for the storms and other weather systems that are driven by the
gradient between slightly cooler and slightly warmer air and water
masses.

That's why record snows and other harsh cold weather are as much a
harbinger of a warming climate as glacial retreat and rising sea
levels. More energetic climate equals more chaotic climate, and even
the cold extremes will reflect that.

Chalo

Patrick Turner wrote:
On Dec 15, 12:36 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
snip bits and peices.....

God, you global warmies are tenth-rate.

Well, lookin at how all the Warmies are communicating in Copenhagen,
I'd tend to agree.

But meanwhile the ice in the world continues to melt and glaciers
retreat and average temps are on the rise despite the Coolies saying
its a'coolin justa bit now.......

The biggest company running the NSW ski resort at Perisher Valley in
NSW is worried it will soon have to spend 40 million bucks on an
enormous expansion of artificial snow making machinery during the next
decade or else it risks going broke because ppl won't want to ski.
That company, like many others, know warming is happening.

The whole trouble with Warming is that it is creeping up on us way too
slow. We are getting use to it as it warms. Nothing seems odd. Sky is
still blue, birds sing songs in trees outside, the grass is green,
well, in springtime at least anyway. Warming is an idea that was
designed to be denied. And getting stoinkingly rich appeals to most
people much more than moping about all gloomy over boring
temperatures; and when ppl do get rich ppl just buy a bigger air con
to be comfy, problem solved.

I reckon if a decent hurricane blew the whole state of NY into the
Atlantic, maybe ppl would act, or if sea levels rose a metre by
Easter, or if their supermarkets put up their prices 100% in 6mths
because of food shortages. Bible sales would rise though, despite
bible price rises......

The other trouble with Warming is that although we here now will
aclimatise to the changes, maybe billions of future ppl won't be able
to so easily - whatever the causes of the warming. Warming is a bit
like cancer. If you detect cancer early enough, maybe you can save a
person with action. But cancer is not always able to be stopped
despite the medical bills people pay for treatment. So getting people
to invest in the cost of anti-warming measures as a form of insurance
is extremely difficult considering most people in the world don't know
what an insurance policy and premium is, and when **** happens in
their lives they just suffer and/or perish without any help.

Mein Got, I will soon get the Nobel Prize for Being Avidly Depressed,
the nobel BAD award.......

But I still like triodes and bicycles.

Patrick Turner.

alternate:
http://www.hornpipe.com/ba/ba13a.htm

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org/
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Patrick Turner wrote:
But meanwhile the ice in the world continues to melt and glaciers
retreat and average temps are on the rise despite the Coolies saying
its a'coolin justa bit now.......

Chalo wrote:
Within our lifetimes, it will be weather and not temperature that will
get our attention. One degree warmer feels the same to us as one
degree cooler, but that one degree represents a stupendous amount of
energy for the storms and other weather systems that are driven by the
gradient between slightly cooler and slightly warmer air and water
masses.

That's why record snows and other harsh cold weather are as much a
harbinger of a warming climate as glacial retreat and rising sea
levels. More energetic climate equals more chaotic climate, and even
the cold extremes will reflect that.

oh, the horror:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...009-quiet.html

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org/
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

On Dec 15, 8:18 am, Patrick Turner wrote:
On Dec 15, 9:20 am, Andre Jute wrote:

If 220,000,000 murders, and counting, were necessary to ban DDT, how
many billion will be the 'few necessary murders' of global warming?

And who will those few billion murdered by anti-global warming
measures be?

Here are a few extracts from the MEIN KAMPF of the next genocide:

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100
million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see
wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout
the world.”
--Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

Don't worry Andre, someone will shoot Dave first before the others.

Makes me nostalgic for the days when I could put some little ****** in
front of the firing squad for taking my parking spot across the door
from El Presidente, my boss.

“The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.”
-- Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point

Again, no need to worry about such value statements.


Let's be clear, Patrick: those guys aren't joking; they mean it.

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from
present levels, would be ideal.”
-- Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

Then he could corner a market and build things back up when he becmes
a dicktator.
He'd have rather a lot of opposition.....

He thrives on it. For fun he headed up a syndicate to compete for the
America's Cup.

„A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the
present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion.
At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would
be possible.“
-- United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment

Again there are too many ppl in the way to worry about this idea.

That didn't worry Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot and suchlike. Why
should it worry UN officials who see man as "the cancer?" You naivety
astounds me, Patrick.

„In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000
people per day.“
-- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier

There's a mob outside and they wanna start with Jacques....

I wish.

Osama bin Laden never dreamed such dreams of genocide...

Andre Jute
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea
that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine
and the like would fit the bill.” -- Club of Rome, The First Global
Revolution

Don't let hot nights keep you awake in summertime.

6 degrees C today, wind 12 miles. You can bet your house I wasn't
wearing a kilt!

Of course nobody knows how we'll cope in the year 3009 when there are
30 billion on the planet but I'm told McDonalds is looking forward to
that day.

They probably got a recipe for Soylent Green already.

I'm sure there are millions of other planets in the observable
universe with life or maybe life has been and gone.

That's always seemed likely to me. The universe is vast.

And I'm sure many
planets have had crowd control bothers, or will have them, or have
them now which would mean they would have to think of a way to survive
against plagues, shortages, temperatures, etc, etc, etc, not to
mention troubles with politicians only thinking 10 years ahead, and
demographics experts telling ppl bull****.

The chances of sentient beings developing are rather less, and the
chances of them being humanoid are vanishingly small, perceptible,
calculable even, only because the universe is so vast and growing all
the time.

And maybe this universe is a mere pimple on God's nose, and the rest
of the body of God and the world and universe in which God lives is
just a pimple on a larger God's nose, and so on until 10 raised to an
infinite number.......

Whoa! I would want some time to give serious consideration to whether
I want to be a pimple on God's nose and therefore the subject of his
careful attention, or a pimple on his arse, to be thoughlessly
scratched out of existence. Don't get reckless in your old age,
Patrick.

But while you consider the authors you mention above and their
unlikely solutions, consider a world in maybe 3009 where Ireland is 5C
average hotter, and food production falls to 20% of what it is now

That doesn't follow at all. Quite the contrary. Higher temperature is
good for plants; the harvests get bigger. Our modern world has its
characteristic shape because of the "global warming" of the Medieval
Warm Period when agriculture was firmly established, plant yields
escalated drastically, and people had disposable income because of
higher agricultural yields.

but
there are 3 times the ppl to feed, and oil has risen to 4 times the
price it is now, and sea levels have risen a metre or two.

Everything has a natural cycle. So what? it is incredible arrogant,
hubris in fact, to claim that our particular time is the best of all
times, and the planet should be fixed in our image.

People are like rats and when you have a sufficient number in too
small a space then fighting and disease tend to break out and the
numbers are culled. Nuclear war would be a great culler of all
species, and the genetic mutations which might follow such a war may
not necessarily lead more co-operative types to breed better than
those who just fight.

You should write science fiction, Patrick. Sure to pay better than
building amps.

The future is frightfully un-predictable, and God won't tell us who
else to contact to advice.

It's good that you realize it. So why do you global warmies advocate
all kinds of reckless measures that will make the future even more
uncertain through the law of unintended effect?

Andre Jute
The IPCC -- longest hand job in the history of mass hysteria -- has
now lasted almost twice as long as the Third Reich

On Dec 15, 10:17 am, Chalo wrote:
Patrick Turner wrote:

But meanwhile the ice in the world continues to melt and glaciers
retreat and average temps are on the rise despite the Coolies saying
its a'coolin justa bit now.......

Within our lifetimes, it will be weather and not temperature that will
get our attention. One degree warmer feels the same to us as one
degree cooler, but that one degree represents a stupendous amount of
energy for the storms and other weather systems that are driven by the
gradient between slightly cooler and slightly warmer air and water
masses.

That's why record snows and other harsh cold weather are as much a
harbinger of a warming climate as glacial retreat and rising sea
levels. More energetic climate equals more chaotic climate, and even
the cold extremes will reflect that.

Chalo

A little local weather, isn't that what the global warmies say when
the sensible people point to the crisp, cool day outside the window?

Andre Jute
What is sauce for the goose...