A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Social Issues
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Salon article on a new school of traffic design



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 21st 04, 02:01 AM
Joe Riel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Salon article on a new school of traffic design

The following link might be of interest
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/20...ign/index.html

It describes what sounds like a completely chaotic method for
"controlling" traffic.
Ads
  #2  
Old May 21st 04, 03:48 AM
Bill Z.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Salon article on a new school of traffic design

Joe Riel writes:

The following link might be of interest
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/20...ign/index.html

It describes what sounds like a completely chaotic method for
"controlling" traffic.


The web site doesn't work - I won't subscribe nor let them set
cookies, and I've no idea what their friggin "commercial" is, but I've
no reason to trust them.

The idea sounds like something that's been tried in the Netherlands,
where residential areas allow cars, pedestrians, and bikes to share
the same space. This can be appropriate for short distances, where
the primary function of the road system is to provide access to
residences, and where traffic will tend to be very light.

In some cases, you might have a parking lot on the outskirts, but can
still drive in to drop off some bulky object you just purchased.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  #3  
Old May 21st 04, 04:22 AM
Joe Riel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Salon article on a new school of traffic design

Bill Z. wrote:
Joe Riel writes:


The following link might be of interest
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/20...ign/index.html

It describes what sounds like a completely chaotic method for
"controlling" traffic.



The web site doesn't work - I won't subscribe nor let them set
cookies, and I've no idea what their friggin "commercial" is, but I've
no reason to trust them.


I read salon.com frequently---probably should subscribe---but have
never had a problem with their commercials misbehaving.

The idea sounds like something that's been tried in the Netherlands,
where residential areas allow cars, pedestrians, and bikes to share
the same space. This can be appropriate for short distances, where
the primary function of the road system is to provide access to
residences, and where traffic will tend to be very light.


That's pretty much what the article is about.

Joe
  #4  
Old May 21st 04, 06:05 AM
Bill Z.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Salon article on a new school of traffic design

Joe Riel writes:

Bill Z. wrote:
Joe Riel writes:

The following link might be of interest
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/20...ign/index.html

It describes what sounds like a completely chaotic method for
"controlling" traffic.

The web site doesn't work - I won't subscribe nor let them set
cookies, and I've no idea what their friggin "commercial" is, but I've
no reason to trust them.


I read salon.com frequently---probably should subscribe---but have
never had a problem with their commercials misbehaving.


If a site requires cookies to just browse web pages, that is an
indication that the site is up to no good and should not be
trusted.

If a site is abusing you by selling information about what you
read, using the cookies to determine your identity (possibly
indirectly if cookies are shared between sites), it is almost
impossible for you to tell. Privacy policies can mean something
quite different than you think due to multiple servers, each
separately administered and each with its own policy.

And, every time someone tries to get privacy legislation passed,
big business opposes it. You can guess why.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  #5  
Old May 21st 04, 06:31 AM
Fritz M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Salon article on a new school of traffic design


On Fri, 21 May 2004 01:01:20 GMT, Joe Riel wrote:

It describes what sounds like a completely chaotic method for
"controlling" traffic.


I tried an experiment today: I walked across a parking lot. I pickup
truck and a BMW both gunned their engines to try to beat me to an
intersection, but I made it clear I wasn't stopping for them and kept
right on walking, forcing them to stop.

Parking lots should not be considered pedestrian-free zones, yet
somehow even here peds cower in fear of the cars. It's time to change
the paradigm.

RFM
--
http://www.masoner.net/
Email: richard is at the given domain.
RFM
--
http://www.masoner.net/
Email: richard is at the given domain.
  #6  
Old May 22nd 04, 08:07 PM
Cathy Kearns
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Salon article on a new school of traffic design


"Joe Riel" wrote in message
...
The following link might be of interest
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/20...ign/index.html

It describes what sounds like a completely chaotic method for
"controlling" traffic.


Actually, it sounds like our back streets to school. The main entrance to
the elementary school is on a two lane main street with a wide sidewalk
down one side and bike lanes on both sides of the street. Speed limit
is 25mph, and there is a crossing guard to get folks from the sidewalk
side to the school side of the street. There is almost enough parking
in the lot, and some street parking. In general, despite all this in place,
people look at the front of the school and are forever deriding it as
unsafe. Yet, there is a back street to the school. It is residential,
and in parts is not wide enough for two cars to pass. There are
no sidewalks or bikelanes. All the kids walk or bike, and the
few cars that venture onto the street creep along extremely
slowly worried about the pedestrians and bicyclists. It works
well, and there have been no accidents that I know of since my
kids started walking or biking to school there 10 years ago.
(And I get the official accident reports due to a city
bicycle committee I am a member of.) You need critical
mass of bicylists and pedestrians, but it really works.


  #7  
Old May 24th 04, 04:27 PM
Jym Dyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Salon article on a new school of traffic design

=v= I got ahold of this article (the stupid interactive
Javascript ad wouldn't actually work, but I have my ways),
and found it to be pretty odd.

=v= I'm not sure what "second generation" traffic-calming is
supposed to mean, because the principles mentioned are the same
as regular ol' ("first generation?") traffic-calming. Maybe
it's just marketing. Maybe it has something to do with the
"evolutionary biology" veneer. I dunno.

=v= That said, it's nice that a _Salon_ writer is delivering the
concepts to a new audience, whatever she's labelling them. It's
unfortunate that her point of departure is Suzhou, China, since
the sudden disastrous increase in car traffic in Chinese cities
has killed many pedestrians and bicyclists. I would point to
Manhattan as a much better example of "no rules" that works much
better. (Neither example is really a "Woonerf," though!)
_Jym_
  #8  
Old June 1st 04, 04:01 AM
Jym Dyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Salon article on a new school of traffic design

It's much better to read the original - here it is:
http://www.lesstraffic.com/Articles/index.htm


=v= Yeah, I looked up lesstraffic.com myself. Here's
David Engwicht on what he calls "second-generation
traffic calming:"

http://www.lesstraffic.com/Articles/Traffic/SGTC.htm

It's quite different from what the _Salon_ article
was saying.
_Jym_
  #9  
Old June 1st 04, 04:03 PM
Cathy Kearns
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Salon article on a new school of traffic design

Thanks, I needed this article.

"Jym Dyer" wrote in message
...
It's much better to read the original - here it is:
http://www.lesstraffic.com/Articles/index.htm


=v= Yeah, I looked up lesstraffic.com myself. Here's
David Engwicht on what he calls "second-generation
traffic calming:"

http://www.lesstraffic.com/Articles/Traffic/SGTC.htm

It's quite different from what the _Salon_ article
was saying.
_Jym_



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Actually you are the first person to bring up this issue" James Annan Mountain Biking 428 April 4th 04 08:59 PM
Reports from Sweden Garry Jones General 17 October 14th 03 05:23 PM
Reports from Sweden Garry Jones Social Issues 14 October 14th 03 05:23 PM
Hasty generalizations of the day Kerry Nikolaisen General 16 October 6th 03 12:39 PM
Riding facing traffic Bruce G Patrick General 4 August 12th 03 08:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.