#1
|
|||
|
|||
Short-Stopper
I'm sitting here in Aurora, Illinois, USA, wondering if the police
ever apprehended the guy who short-stopped the training ride resulting in multiple injuries. -- jeverett3ATsbcglobalDOTnet (John V. Everett) |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Short-Stopper
Yes, he was later apprehended. He apparently claimed his car was running on
LPG fuel (liquid petroleum gas) and it ran out, so he "had to stop" to change it over and run on petrol !! http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...444378555.html He also rang in to a radio talkback show making all sorts of dumb statements and arguing with one of the road racing stars involved in the crash. http://2gb.com/podcasts/rayhadleybikecrash100508.mp3 Dumb Klutz!! Throw the book at him. Grrrr! -- Cheers Peter ~~~ ~ _@ ~~ ~ _- \, ~~ (*)/ (*) "John Everett" wrote in message news I'm sitting here in Aurora, Illinois, USA, wondering if the police ever apprehended the guy who short-stopped the training ride resulting in multiple injuries. -- jeverett3ATsbcglobalDOTnet (John V. Everett) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Short-Stopper
That podcast link should be:
http://podcasts.2gb.com/rayhadley/ra...rash100508.mp3 Good ol' Jason, he's such a pearler! But Ben Kersten has an interesting viewpoint on his claims of innocence. -- Cheers Peter ~~~ ~ _@ ~~ ~ _- \, ~~ (*)/ (*) "PeteSig" wrote in message ... Yes, he was later apprehended. He apparently claimed his car was running on LPG fuel (liquid petroleum gas) and it ran out, so he "had to stop" to change it over and run on petrol !! http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...444378555.html He also rang in to a radio talkback show making all sorts of dumb statements and arguing with one of the road racing stars involved in the crash. http://2gb.com/podcasts/rayhadleybikecrash100508.mp3 Dumb Klutz!! Throw the book at him. Grrrr! -- Cheers Peter ~~~ ~ _@ ~~ ~ _- \, ~~ (*)/ (*) "John Everett" wrote in message news I'm sitting here in Aurora, Illinois, USA, wondering if the police ever apprehended the guy who short-stopped the training ride resulting in multiple injuries. -- jeverett3ATsbcglobalDOTnet (John V. Everett) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Short-Stopper
PeteSig wrote:
Yes, he was later apprehended. He apparently claimed his car was running on LPG fuel (liquid petroleum gas) and it ran out, so he "had to stop" to change it over and run on petrol !! http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...444378555.html He also rang in to a radio talkback show making all sorts of dumb statements and arguing with one of the road racing stars involved in the crash. http://2gb.com/podcasts/rayhadleybikecrash100508.mp3 Dumb Klutz!! Throw the book at him. Grrrr! Has anything come of this since? As far as I know, he was only charged for failing to stop after an accident. In addition, I would have guessed, that had he been someone of a more 'normal' state of mind, he would be publically questioning the installers or retailers of the LPG kit for the "failure". Lack thereof appears to lean towards he knew full well what was going on, and there was very probably nothing wrong with his kit, and the sudden stop was wholly a direct result of his foot against the brake. Also a very noticeable absence of any police testing of his vehicle. Did they not care, not have any legal requirement to check, or were they interrupted on their doughnut run thus not inclined to do the paperwork? -- Linux Registered User # 302622 http://counter.li.org |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Short-Stopper
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:52:11 +1000, John Tserkezis wrote:
Also a very noticeable absence of any police testing of his vehicle. Did they not care, not have any legal requirement to check, or were they interrupted on their doughnut run thus not inclined to do the paperwork? Was some one injured? as in being taken away by ambulance?, if not, police not interested, or Did a vehicle require towing, if not, police not interested. It them comes to participants claiming dmages from their insurance companies, who them settle who pays what. If directly involved parties want to take civil action, then injured parties can launch a civil claim against each other for what is basically sharing of direct dollar damages in the proportion as decided by the courts. The claim progresses by each party submtting documents to the judge/magistrate at a hearing, with opportunity for verbal statement, then returning to hear the judge/magistrates decision. That is how I uderstand it works. Aka, the almighty dollar rules. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Short-Stopper
"John Tserkezis" wrote: Has anything come of this since? As far as I know, he was only charged for failing to stop after an accident. Be patient, it's only been a couple of weeks. Charges laid, then police complete their inquiries. Some weeks/months later the case is heard, probably only at mgidtrates court level. In addition, I would have guessed, that had he been someone of a more 'normal' state of mind, he would be publically questioning the installers or retailers of the LPG kit for the "failure". He may choose to do this, but not likely to be in the public domain. It is entirely a private complaint/warranty IF he bothers to do anything. Also a very noticeable absence of any police testing of his vehicle. Did they not care, not have any legal requirement to check, or were they interrupted on their doughnut run thus not inclined to do the paperwork? Do you really think that any such testing will be made public, before a court hearing? That's not how our legal system works. The trial is the place for any such findings to be revealed. -- Cheers Peter ~~~ ~ _@ ~~ ~ _- \, ~~ (*)/ (*) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Short-Stopper
terryc wrote:
Also a very noticeable absence of any police testing of his vehicle. Did they not care, not have any legal requirement to check, or were they interrupted on their doughnut run thus not inclined to do the paperwork? Was some one injured? as in being taken away by ambulance?, if not, police not interested, or Did a vehicle require towing, if not, police not interested. It them comes to participants claiming dmages from their insurance companies, who them settle who pays what. If directly involved parties want to take civil action, then injured parties can launch a civil claim against each other for what is basically sharing of direct dollar damages in the proportion as decided by the courts. The claim progresses by each party submtting documents to the judge/magistrate at a hearing, with opportunity for verbal statement, then returning to hear the judge/magistrates decision. That is how I understand it works. Aka, the almighty dollar rules. What you said is disgusting. It's also quite true. Money talks, bull**** walks. -- Linux Registered User # 302622 http://counter.li.org |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Short-Stopper
"PeteSig" wrote in message ... "John Tserkezis" wrote: Has anything come of this since? As far as I know, he was only charged for failing to stop after an accident. Be patient, it's only been a couple of weeks. Charges laid, then police complete their inquiries. Some weeks/months later the case is heard, probably only at mgidtrates court level. Hope the journos or WOJ or cycling magazines etc are following the court case and report what happens. If it is a magistrates court there is no transcript of the court case AFAIK, so hard to find out what went on. It would be good if there was a search you could do on these sort of incidents between motorists and cylists and the outcomes. I think the Coluzzi ride still goes on, despite all the calls for banning cyclists at 630 am during "peak hour". fb in sydknee |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
short uni vid | Spencer Hochberg | Unicycling | 1 | September 17th 06 01:56 AM |
RR: (Short) | Ride-A-Lot | Mountain Biking | 3 | May 1st 06 10:40 PM |
RR: short & wet | gabrielle | Mountain Biking | 1 | October 9th 04 11:28 PM |
3" Too Short | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 31 | May 7th 04 12:14 PM |