|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:07:45 +0200, Simply Fred
wrote: Jimmy July wrote: The problem is that you've never been able to distinguish between the set of people who are Lance fan boys (pretty small on RBR) and the set of people who think Lafferty is an asshole (it's unanimous). William Fred wrote: Can't I go with dillweed? Asshat, The correct answer is: all of the above. |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes
"BL" wrote in message
... On 6/14/2011 1:19 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 13, 5:14 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 13, 7:26 am, wrote: Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr. Cheers. BL, of the regular posters here, who do you think qualifies as a LA "fanboy"? Even Mike J. makes it clear that he thinks LA is a doper. I think LA's a doper, everyone I know here thinks he's a doper, too. I don't see much support for him here. Only thing I see are a lot of people who think that LA isn't the anti-Christ, aren't obsessed with his prosecution, and think that even if he's tossed into a supermax that a large number of pro cyclists will continue to dope unabated. Who are you trying to "educate" with this stuff that we all have read and know? ====== I'm not sure how you can knowing people here, but I'm not convinced that Armstrong is a doper. Maybe I'm getting legalistic in my old age, but I actually use legal standards to guide my personal opinion of guilt. -ilan ====== By "legal standards" OJ Simpson didn't kill his wife. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com By civil court legal standards it was proved that he did---wrongful death and all that. Hey bro, I'm helping to make *your* case here. My point was that the "legal standards" that ilan mentions (I'm assuming he's talking criminal, not civil courts) let people off who are clearly guilty. To follow such standards is not to seek the truth. BTW, still waiting for your definition of Lance Fanboy. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes
On Jun 13, 9:08*pm, "Mike Jacoubowsky"
wrote: "BL" wrote in message ... On 6/13/2011 12:50 PM, William R. Mattil wrote: On 6/13/2011 10:27 AM, BL wrote: You can accept that Armstrong is a doper and still be a fanboy. There are very few posters here at rbr anymore who aren't fanboys, Brad. ;-) On a hunch I ran this through Babelfish in an attempt to get a translation for it. Interesting .............. What it means is that anyone not in favor of lynching LA and not agreeing with Laff is a fanboi Pretty broad brush there Brian. Bill Try again, Fanboy. Perhaps you could provide your own definition? This 20 questions things gets a bit old, plus there's no way of knowing if you're defining it dynamically. How about a solid June 13, 2011 definition of Lance Fanboy? Thanks- --Mike-- * * Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReactionBicycles.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Find the nearest mirror Mikey-Mike. Thanks, JFG |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes
"Juan Gunderson" wrote in message
... On Jun 13, 9:08 pm, "Mike Jacoubowsky" wrote: "BL" wrote in message ... On 6/13/2011 12:50 PM, William R. Mattil wrote: On 6/13/2011 10:27 AM, BL wrote: You can accept that Armstrong is a doper and still be a fanboy. There are very few posters here at rbr anymore who aren't fanboys, Brad. ;-) On a hunch I ran this through Babelfish in an attempt to get a translation for it. Interesting .............. What it means is that anyone not in favor of lynching LA and not agreeing with Laff is a fanboi Pretty broad brush there Brian. Bill Try again, Fanboy. Perhaps you could provide your own definition? This 20 questions things gets a bit old, plus there's no way of knowing if you're defining it dynamically. How about a solid June 13, 2011 definition of Lance Fanboy? Thanks- --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReactionBicycles.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ===== Find the nearest mirror Mikey-Mike. Thanks, JFG ===== Seriously? That's the best you can do? C'mon, take a shot at it. Try describing what a "Lance Fanboy" would be to someone without reference to a person, but rather attributes. Can you do it? --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes
Jimmy July wrote:
The problem is that you've never been able to distinguish between the set of people who are Lance fan boys (pretty small on RBR) and the set of people who think Lafferty is an asshole (it's unanimous). William Fred wrote: Can't I go with dillweed? Simply Fred wrote: Asshat, elmo leonard wrote: The correct answer is: all of the above. Candyass |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes
On 6/15/2011 12:08 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
wrote in message ... On 6/14/2011 1:19 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 13, 5:14 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 13, 7:26 am, wrote: Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr. Cheers. BL, of the regular posters here, who do you think qualifies as a LA "fanboy"? Even Mike J. makes it clear that he thinks LA is a doper. I think LA's a doper, everyone I know here thinks he's a doper, too. I don't see much support for him here. Only thing I see are a lot of people who think that LA isn't the anti-Christ, aren't obsessed with his prosecution, and think that even if he's tossed into a supermax that a large number of pro cyclists will continue to dope unabated. Who are you trying to "educate" with this stuff that we all have read and know? ====== I'm not sure how you can knowing people here, but I'm not convinced that Armstrong is a doper. Maybe I'm getting legalistic in my old age, but I actually use legal standards to guide my personal opinion of guilt. -ilan ====== By "legal standards" OJ Simpson didn't kill his wife. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com By civil court legal standards it was proved that he did---wrongful death and all that. Hey bro, I'm helping to make *your* case here. My point was that the "legal standards" that ilan mentions (I'm assuming he's talking criminal, not civil courts) let people off who are clearly guilty. To follow such standards is not to seek the truth. BTW, still waiting for your definition of Lance Fanboy. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com Lok in the mirror. Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the fairest Lance Fanboy of all? LOL!! |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes
"BL" wrote in message
... On 6/15/2011 12:08 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On 6/14/2011 1:19 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 13, 5:14 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 13, 7:26 am, wrote: Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr. Cheers. BL, of the regular posters here, who do you think qualifies as a LA "fanboy"? Even Mike J. makes it clear that he thinks LA is a doper. I think LA's a doper, everyone I know here thinks he's a doper, too. I don't see much support for him here. Only thing I see are a lot of people who think that LA isn't the anti-Christ, aren't obsessed with his prosecution, and think that even if he's tossed into a supermax that a large number of pro cyclists will continue to dope unabated. Who are you trying to "educate" with this stuff that we all have read and know? ====== I'm not sure how you can knowing people here, but I'm not convinced that Armstrong is a doper. Maybe I'm getting legalistic in my old age, but I actually use legal standards to guide my personal opinion of guilt. -ilan ====== By "legal standards" OJ Simpson didn't kill his wife. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com By civil court legal standards it was proved that he did---wrongful death and all that. Hey bro, I'm helping to make *your* case here. My point was that the "legal standards" that ilan mentions (I'm assuming he's talking criminal, not civil courts) let people off who are clearly guilty. To follow such standards is not to seek the truth. BTW, still waiting for your definition of Lance Fanboy. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com Lok in the mirror. Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the fairest Lance Fanboy of all? LOL!! So you can't rise about school-yard name-calling? --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes
On 6/15/2011 12:51 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
wrote in message ... On 6/15/2011 12:08 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On 6/14/2011 1:19 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 13, 5:14 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 13, 7:26 am, wrote: Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr. Cheers. BL, of the regular posters here, who do you think qualifies as a LA "fanboy"? Even Mike J. makes it clear that he thinks LA is a doper. I think LA's a doper, everyone I know here thinks he's a doper, too. I don't see much support for him here. Only thing I see are a lot of people who think that LA isn't the anti-Christ, aren't obsessed with his prosecution, and think that even if he's tossed into a supermax that a large number of pro cyclists will continue to dope unabated. Who are you trying to "educate" with this stuff that we all have read and know? ====== I'm not sure how you can knowing people here, but I'm not convinced that Armstrong is a doper. Maybe I'm getting legalistic in my old age, but I actually use legal standards to guide my personal opinion of guilt. -ilan ====== By "legal standards" OJ Simpson didn't kill his wife. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com By civil court legal standards it was proved that he did---wrongful death and all that. Hey bro, I'm helping to make *your* case here. My point was that the "legal standards" that ilan mentions (I'm assuming he's talking criminal, not civil courts) let people off who are clearly guilty. To follow such standards is not to seek the truth. BTW, still waiting for your definition of Lance Fanboy. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com Lok in the mirror. Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the fairest Lance Fanboy of all? LOL!! So you can't rise about school-yard name-calling? --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com Why should I? This is rbr. In your case I guess you're a Business****Tard selling Treks. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes
"BL" wrote in message
... On 6/15/2011 12:51 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On 6/15/2011 12:08 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On 6/14/2011 1:19 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 13, 5:14 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 13, 7:26 am, wrote: Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr. Cheers. BL, of the regular posters here, who do you think qualifies as a LA "fanboy"? Even Mike J. makes it clear that he thinks LA is a doper. I think LA's a doper, everyone I know here thinks he's a doper, too. I don't see much support for him here. Only thing I see are a lot of people who think that LA isn't the anti-Christ, aren't obsessed with his prosecution, and think that even if he's tossed into a supermax that a large number of pro cyclists will continue to dope unabated. Who are you trying to "educate" with this stuff that we all have read and know? ====== I'm not sure how you can knowing people here, but I'm not convinced that Armstrong is a doper. Maybe I'm getting legalistic in my old age, but I actually use legal standards to guide my personal opinion of guilt. -ilan ====== By "legal standards" OJ Simpson didn't kill his wife. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com By civil court legal standards it was proved that he did---wrongful death and all that. Hey bro, I'm helping to make *your* case here. My point was that the "legal standards" that ilan mentions (I'm assuming he's talking criminal, not civil courts) let people off who are clearly guilty. To follow such standards is not to seek the truth. BTW, still waiting for your definition of Lance Fanboy. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com Lok in the mirror. Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the fairest Lance Fanboy of all? LOL!! So you can't rise about school-yard name-calling? --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com Why should I? This is rbr. In your case I guess you're a Business****Tard selling Treks. It is a choice, not a requirement, to avoid civil discourse in a conversation, on rbr or anywhere else. Just as it is a choice to directly answer a question in a way that helps someone understand your position, or simply resort to name calling, 4-letter epithets or whatever. Yes, this is rbr, and yes, I recognize that I'm out of my mind to believe that we could be civil here and learn something from others. But I'll keep trying anyway. --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lance Armstrong Doping Investigation On '60 Minutes' | Ubiquitous | Racing | 6 | May 25th 11 08:29 PM |
Tyler went after cycling more than Lance | Anton Berlin | Racing | 2 | May 24th 11 01:03 AM |
Lance Loses By 3 1/2 Minutes | [email protected] | General | 14 | July 24th 05 07:18 AM |
60 minutes Lance Special | Ben | Australia | 7 | July 11th 05 07:46 AM |
Lance Armstrong Press Conference - Starting in 10 minutes | GaryG | Racing | 1 | April 18th 05 07:58 PM |