|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biking Increases Airborne Dust, Reducing the Snowpack
One more nail in mountain biking's coffin.
Mike An unusually high number of the storms has left a film of dust on the Rocky Mountain snowpack, causing it to melt earlier and forcing farmers to adjust. This could be the new normal, scientists say. By Nicholas Riccardi May 24, 2009 Reporting from Denver -- A series of unusual spring dust storms has left the snowcapped mountains of western Colorado stained brown and red, even a bit pink. The dust is speeding up the runoff to rivers that supply millions of people with water and raising fears of an increasingly arid West. Twelve dust storms barreled into the southern Rockies from the deserts of Arizona, Utah and New Mexico so far this year. In contrast, four storms hit the mountains all year long in 2003. Eight occurred in each of the last three years. Greenspace blog: Environmental news from California and beyond "This year's been really, really strong," said Jason Neff, a hydrologist at the University of Colorado-Boulder. "Something's been going on, and I don't think we're exactly sure what." The storms leave a dark film on snow that melts it faster by hastening its absorption of the sun's energy. That, coupled with unseasonably warm temperatures, has sped up the runoff here, swelling rivers to near flood stage, threatening to make reservoirs overflow and fueling fears that there will not be enough water left for late-summer crops. "It creates a high-pressured game of Twister for water managers," said Thomas Painter, director of the Snow Optics Lab at the University of Utah. "They're having to make decisions quickly to hold on to water or release water." Painter has found that dust can speed up snowmelt by as much as 35 days -- in other words, snow that would normally disappear by May 15 would instead be gone by April 10. Ever since European settlement of the West, there has been dust, caused by outside forces breaking the fragile crust that holds undisturbed desert soil in place. Initially, grazing cattle kicked up the dust. Scientists say it is now more likely to be caused by off-road vehicles, mountain bikers or energy exploration. In a study last year, Neff found that the amount of dust in the Rockies is five times greater than before the late 19th century. "This is really the story of the wholesale transformation of the West," Painter said. Even without the dust storms, forecasters predict that global warming will reduce the soil quality in the western United States to dust-bowl levels by 2050, said Jayne Belnap, a scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey. The Southwest's temperatures are expected to rise by 10 degrees Celsius by 2100. "It's just a harbinger of the future," Belnap said of the dust storms. "This is the kind of world we need to imagine we're going to be living in and decide if we can afford this dust." Dust and soot are contributing to the disappearance of mountain snows and the disturbance of water supplies all over the world. The Asian "brown cloud" rising from that continent's megalopolises is blamed for speeding up the melting of glaciers and snow in the Himalayas. Dust blown from the plains of eastern Africa is helping destroy the snows of Mt. Kilimanjaro. In California, the Sierra Nevada snowpack gets some soot from Asia and from the state's own smog-emitting centers, but little dust. State officials have begun to study whether that soot could be contributing to a sped-up snowmelt that, if it continues unabated, could someday overwhelm the reservoir system. Because winds in the western United States blow from the southwest, dust from the deserts of California, the Great Basin and the Colorado plateau is deposited on the southern Rockies. The amounts of wind-blown dust in the West peaked in the 1920s, reaching seven times the historic norm. Scientists think the level of dust dropped after Congress sharply limited cattle grazing in 1934, near the height of the Dust Bowl. Today, levels are five times the historic norm. It is only recently that scientists have begun to study dust's effect on snow and water supplies. Painter and his colleagues only started tracking storms in 2003. "We haven't thought about dust as a serious environmental issue," Neff said. This year's storms put the issue front and center, especially the final three, which swept through southeastern Utah and southwestern Colorado within a few days of one another in late March and early April. Mountains that usually remain snow-covered until midsummer are already almost bare along the entire western stretch of Colorado. "We've seen several days with just incredible obstruction in the air," said Steve Vandiver, general manager of the Rio Grande Water Conservation District, 7,500 feet high in the San Luis Valley of southern Colorado. Now the snowmelt is about 20 days early, and Vandiver's system is on the brink of flooding. He said some farmers and ranchers who rely on streams that normally run all summer long will be without water. "This whole system was built around the runoff coming pretty much as the crops came up," he said. The dust left its smear on a number of Colorado's storied ski resorts, leading to grousing by some skiers about slushier, dirtier snow. Jeff Hanley, a spokesman for the Aspen Skiing Co., said that as long as slopes were being groomed the dust was not a problem. "It didn't affect our operations. It just looked kind of funny," he said. "You'd ski and turn around and look at your tracks and they'd be red chocolate." He said the industry is not worried -- yet. "If it's going to be a regular thing for the next few years, that's one thing, but we don't know that yet." But some scientists note that the West has ended an unusual, 50-year wet period and is returning to its normal, more arid state. Belnap, the USGS scientist, said that the sort of activities that kick up dust may not be increasing -- they just may be more damaging because conditions are drier. "We've been talking about this for 20 years, but it's been wet and we've had a lot of plants" helping to hold the soil down, Belnap said. "It's not necessarily that everyone's doing more. You've suddenly got a drier surface." -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biking Increases Airborne Dust, Reducing the Snowpack
"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message ... One more nail in mountain biking's coffin. Mike You're an idiot, and the author is only slightly better. He's (and you are) attributing early exposure of the ground under the snow to faster melt rates of the snow. But the real problem is that the snow pack is thinner, and therefore melts away sooner. Regardless of the dust that may or may not exist, when the snow pack is not as thick or dense as normal, it's going to melt away faster. Furthermore, if there was no mountain biking for YOU to blame the dust on, there would still be the same amount of dust from all of the other much larger sources -- farming, driving on dirt roads, whatever ... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biking Increases Airborne Dust, Reducing the Snowpack
On May 25, 3:21*pm, "Jeff Strickland" wrote:
"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message ... One more nail in mountain biking's coffin. Mike You're an idiot, and the author is only slightly better. He's (and you are) attributing early exposure of the ground under the snow to faster melt rates of the snow. But the real problem is that the snow pack is thinner, and therefore melts away sooner. Regardless of the dust that may or may not exist, when the snow pack is not as thick or dense as normal, it's going to melt away faster. Furthermore, if there was no mountain biking for YOU to blame the dust on, there would still be the same amount of dust from all of the other much larger sources -- farming, driving on dirt roads, whatever ... And just consider all those mountain bikers exhaling all that carbon dioxide tipping the climate to a disastrous degree. (No charge for pun.) PMH |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biking Increases Airborne Dust, Reducing the Snowpack
On Mon, 25 May 2009 12:21:29 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote: "Mike Vandeman" wrote in message .. . One more nail in mountain biking's coffin. Mike You're an idiot, and the author is only slightly better. He's (and you are) attributing early exposure of the ground under the snow to faster melt rates of the snow. But the real problem is that the snow pack is thinner, and therefore melts away sooner. Regardless of the dust that may or may not exist, when the snow pack is not as thick or dense as normal, it's going to melt away faster. Furthermore, if there was no mountain biking for YOU to blame the dust on, there would still be the same amount of dust from all of the other much larger sources -- farming, driving on dirt roads, whatever ... I know you can't read, so I'll help you. The article clearly implicates mountain biking as one of the major creators of the dust that covers the snow, making it melt faster. That means that there will be less water when it is most needed. Ask your mommie to explain that to you. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biking Increases Airborne Dust, Reducing the Snowpack
On May 25, 11:18*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 12:21:29 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" wrote: "Mike Vandeman" wrote in message .. . One more nail in mountain biking's coffin. Mike You're an idiot, and the author is only slightly better. He's (and you are) attributing early exposure of the ground under the snow to faster melt rates of the snow. But the real problem is that the snow pack is thinner, and therefore melts away sooner. Regardless of the dust that may or may not exist, when the snow pack is not as thick or dense as normal, it's going to melt away faster. Furthermore, if there was no mountain biking for YOU to blame the dust on, there would still be the same amount of dust from all of the other much larger sources -- farming, driving on dirt roads, whatever ... I know you can't read, so I'll help you. The article clearly implicates mountain biking as one of the major creators of the dust that covers the snow, making it melt faster. That means that there will be less water when it is most needed. Ask your mommie to explain that to you. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande Implication is not evidence and hypothesis is not quantification. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biking Increases Airborne Dust, Reducing the Snowpack
what an idiot
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biking Increases Airborne Dust, Reducing the Snowpack
"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message ... On Mon, 25 May 2009 12:21:29 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" wrote: "Mike Vandeman" wrote in message . .. One more nail in mountain biking's coffin. Mike You're an idiot, and the author is only slightly better. He's (and you are) attributing early exposure of the ground under the snow to faster melt rates of the snow. But the real problem is that the snow pack is thinner, and therefore melts away sooner. Regardless of the dust that may or may not exist, when the snow pack is not as thick or dense as normal, it's going to melt away faster. Furthermore, if there was no mountain biking for YOU to blame the dust on, there would still be the same amount of dust from all of the other much larger sources -- farming, driving on dirt roads, whatever ... I know you can't read, so I'll help you. The article clearly implicates mountain biking as one of the major creators of the dust that covers the snow, making it melt faster. That means that there will be less water when it is most needed. Ask your mommie to explain that to you. It is not mathematically possible for mountain biking to be a major contributor to the affects noted i8n the article, which is why the author is only slightly smarter than you. For all we know, yoiu wrote the article under a pen name because you've been laughed out of the auditorium by the respectable environmentalists (if there is such a thing). You peer reviewed your own work again, and are passing it off here. There will be less water when needed because there is already less snow. Ask your mommie to explain that, idiot. If you knew anything about snow, you would know that dirty snow frequently covers the ground long after the clean snow has melted away. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biking Increases Airborne Dust, Reducing the Snowpack
On Mon, 25 May 2009 20:18:30 -0700, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 12:21:29 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" wrote: "Mike Vandeman" wrote in message . .. One more nail in mountain biking's coffin. Mike You're an idiot, and the author is only slightly better. He's (and you are) attributing early exposure of the ground under the snow to faster melt rates of the snow. But the real problem is that the snow pack is thinner, and therefore melts away sooner. Regardless of the dust that may or may not exist, when the snow pack is not as thick or dense as normal, it's going to melt away faster. Furthermore, if there was no mountain biking for YOU to blame the dust on, there would still be the same amount of dust from all of the other much larger sources -- farming, driving on dirt roads, whatever ... I know you can't read, so I'll help you. The article clearly implicates mountain biking as one of the major creators of the dust that covers the snow, making it melt faster. That means that there will be less water when it is most needed. Ask your mommie to explain that to you. Liar! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biking Increases Airborne Dust, Reducing the Snowpack
I know you can't read, so I'll help you. The article clearly
implicates mountain biking as one of the major creators of the dust that covers the snow, making it melt faster. That means that there will be less water when it is most needed. Ask your mommie to explain that to you. This article wrote some bigger idiot than you. Happy recovery |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Bikers Rat Pack & Threaten Woman for Telling the Truth about Mountain Biking! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 2 | April 2nd 08 05:12 PM |
Mountain Bikers Rat Pack & Threaten Woman for Telling the Truth about Mountain Biking! | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 2 | April 2nd 08 05:12 PM |
Wilder Muni--dust to dust | vivalargo | Unicycling | 21 | March 21st 06 09:06 PM |
Reducing the length of a Marzocchi All Mountain LS | Flyinscott | Mountain Biking | 2 | October 27th 05 02:08 PM |
Mountain Biking Video -- See What Mountain Biking Is Really Like! | Peter | Mountain Biking | 0 | March 25th 05 10:56 PM |