A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rohloff makes the case for Cyber Nexus



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old April 27th 09, 10:02 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Andre Jute[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,422
Default Rohloff makes the case for Cyber Nexus

Not that I'm more familiar with the Rohloff 500/14 hub gearbox and
settling in to a pattern of using it, in thing stands out: for
efficiency, you have to work it.

I tend to avoid the geers 7 and below, because they make a depressing
sighing sound. But even in the higher gears, I tend to stay in gear
and mash my way up the incline rather than bother with the stiff
gearchange.

That is not the most efficient way to ride. It might make me fitter
faster, but what we're discussing here is the bike's mechanical
efficiency, not my respiration rate.

Shimano's Cyber Nexus full-automatic hub gears on the other hand
changes gears smoothly to permit the cyclist the maximum speed his pre-
selected exertion level can provide. The rider exerts the same energy,
regardless of the road. In my case this level was set with a minimum
of experimentation and fuss at 80% of my maximum heart rate.

No human can change gears as efficiently as Shimano's Cyber Nexus.

I also have on another bike a manual version of the Nexus Premium/
Alfine gearbox the Cyber Nexus is built on, though I don't want to
pretend I changed gears on that much smoother box (than the Rohloff)
for maximum efficiency all the time. But a large proportion of the
time I did use it well.

The Rohloff with its even gearing steps but with its stiff change thus
makes a convincing case -- for an automatic gearbox!

I don't think it would be difficult to make an automatik Rohloff, and
there could be a small market for it.

Shimano's full-auto hub and derailleur gearboxes are still going but
the prognosis is not good because Shimano has a long history of
ruthlessly killing products which reach only niche markets. I fear
that the Cyber Nexus will become merely a footnote to the
electronically assisted (not automatic) Dura-Ace shifter derived from
it. (The Dura-Ace shifter is a joke, a sop to the macho attitudes of
the roadies, nothing to do with extracting the maximum efficiency from
gears and cyclist.)

However, Rohloff can work within much smaller, specialist markets. I
for one would happily pay two or three hundred Euro for a kit to add
electronic shifting (powered by the hub dynamo already on my bikes) to
the Rohloff box.

Andre Jute
Visit Jute on Bicycles at
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/...20CYCLING.html

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB: Gear case or partial chain cover for bike with Nexus drive WC Handy Marketplace 0 July 21st 08 01:44 PM
Rohloff non-OEM hub in Rohloff OEM frame? Konstantin Shemyak Techniques 3 October 19th 06 02:31 PM
What airline bike case to buy? (Trico Iron Case or XPORT Cargo Case?) Robert Hayden General 2 July 14th 06 04:26 PM
Commonwealth Games Ballot - question about cyber-scalping Walrus Australia 8 June 1st 05 02:43 AM
S&S travel bike-their hard case or the soft case? eflayer2 Techniques 11 February 12th 05 12:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.