|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Who the hell needs Mao?
On Jul 13, 5:36 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
I no longer bother posting any messages of value since there are none but idiots inhabiting these forums. It is all blather, but even so, I stand behind everything I have ever said on Usenet, up to and including dropping an atom bomb on Tom Sherman's head. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota Hey, Big Ed, here's another bomb in your arsenal... (two comments on some Vehicular Cycling instructor killed by a car) Originally Posted by Bekologist "The tragedy of a cycling instructor killed executing a vehicular left turn on a highway speed road is an example of the tenets of vehicular cycling education and autocentric infrastructure failing even a experienced cyclist in the face of heavy traffic and high speed differentials." We don't know exactly what Bruce did or didn't do, and perhaps never will. But we can be sure that the Chief VC Mathematician and followers (who juggle and manipulate numbers and definitions to show the effectiveness of VC education in lowering cycling risk "80% reduction!") will flatly state that BR was not practicing Vehicular Cycling at the time of his accident. By their definition and circular logic process, anyone who has an accident would have not had that accident if only they were cycling vehicularly; any accident is proof that the cyclist wasn't cycling vehicularly. Any cyclist involved in an accident is no longer considered a vehicular cyclist and vehicular cycling maintains its remarkable safety record. http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=561536 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|