A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ARGH!!!! Roof racks!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old May 23rd 16, 03:41 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Macaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 833
Default ARGH!!!! Roof racks!

On Mon, 23 May 2016 11:20:16 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Monday, 23 May 2016 10:12:30 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
On 23.05.2016 06:33, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2016 18:36:45 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Sunday, 22 May 2016 15:01:30 UTC+1, Mr Macaw wrote:
Correct, the electrons move around within solid substances.

Unless at the impossible absolute zero, ALL atoms are moving in
everything all the time.

Actually, at absolute zero, atoms still have a zero point quantum energy.


Correct.
At zero uncertainty of momentum (which it would be if the electron were
not moving) its uncertainty of position would be infinite. A practical
impossibility.


And who says it's impossible to get to absolute zero? It's just not
possible by any means we know of (eg simple cooling by contact with a
colder substance).


You would have to violate or break Plank's law and the Heisenberg
uncertainty Principle to get right to absolute zero.

I shall adjust my sentence above: "Correct, the electrons move around
(with a use required by the device's function) within solid substances."


Actually the coldest place in the known universe is here on Earth.


Is this an attempt at a joke Simon?

--
Is an infirmary a place for people who can't get it up?
Ads
  #52  
Old May 23rd 16, 03:41 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Macaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 833
Default ARGH!!!! Roof racks!

On Monday, 23 May 2016 10:12:30 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
On 23.05.2016 06:33, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2016 18:36:45 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Sunday, 22 May 2016 15:01:30 UTC+1, Mr Macaw wrote:
Correct, the electrons move around within solid substances.

Unless at the impossible absolute zero, ALL atoms are moving in
everything all the time.

Actually, at absolute zero, atoms still have a zero point quantum energy.


Correct.
At zero uncertainty of momentum (which it would be if the electron were
not moving) its uncertainty of position would be infinite. A practical
impossibility.

And who says it's impossible to get to absolute zero? It's just not
possible by any means we know of (eg simple cooling by contact with a
colder substance).


You would have to violate or break Plank's law and the Heisenberg
uncertainty Principle to get right to absolute zero.


I simply do not believe you can't get to absolute zero.

--
"I have a ringing in my ears." Doctor: "Don't answer!"
  #53  
Old May 23rd 16, 04:08 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Alycidon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,921
Default ARGH!!!! Roof racks!

On Monday, 23 May 2016 15:41:16 UTC+1, Mr Macaw wrote:


Actually the coldest place in the known universe is here on Earth.


Is this an attempt at a joke Simon?


It is no joke.
The background radiation temperature in space is 3 Kelvin (Big Bang remnant), but the lowest lab temperature obtained here on Earth is 0.0000000001K.



  #54  
Old May 23rd 16, 04:22 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Macaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 833
Default ARGH!!!! Roof racks!

On Mon, 23 May 2016 16:08:49 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Monday, 23 May 2016 15:41:16 UTC+1, Mr Macaw wrote:


Actually the coldest place in the known universe is here on Earth.


Is this an attempt at a joke Simon?


It is no joke.
The background radiation temperature in space is 3 Kelvin (Big Bang remnant), but the lowest lab temperature obtained here on Earth is 0.0000000001K.


Oh. I thought you were talking about naturally occurring temperatures, not labs.

So they have got pretty much to 0K.

--
If you're bothered by a god-botherer, does that make you god?
  #55  
Old May 23rd 16, 04:41 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Alycidon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,921
Default ARGH!!!! Roof racks!

On Monday, 23 May 2016 16:22:11 UTC+1, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2016 16:08:49 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Monday, 23 May 2016 15:41:16 UTC+1, Mr Macaw wrote:


Actually the coldest place in the known universe is here on Earth.

Is this an attempt at a joke Simon?


It is no joke.
The background radiation temperature in space is 3 Kelvin (Big Bang remnant), but the lowest lab temperature obtained here on Earth is 0.0000000001K.


Oh. I thought you were talking about naturally occurring temperatures, not labs.

So they have got pretty much to 0K.


It's a bit like the speed of light - you can get a particle to 99.999999% of it in theory, but not 100%.

  #56  
Old May 23rd 16, 05:50 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Bod[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default ARGH!!!! Roof racks!

On 23/05/2016 15:41, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2016 11:20:16 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Monday, 23 May 2016 10:12:30 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
On 23.05.2016 06:33, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2016 18:36:45 +0100, Alycidon
wrote:

On Sunday, 22 May 2016 15:01:30 UTC+1, Mr Macaw wrote:
Correct, the electrons move around within solid substances.

Unless at the impossible absolute zero, ALL atoms are moving in
everything all the time.

Actually, at absolute zero, atoms still have a zero point quantum
energy.

Correct.
At zero uncertainty of momentum (which it would be if the electron were
not moving) its uncertainty of position would be infinite. A practical
impossibility.


And who says it's impossible to get to absolute zero? It's just not
possible by any means we know of (eg simple cooling by contact with a
colder substance).

You would have to violate or break Plank's law and the Heisenberg
uncertainty Principle to get right to absolute zero.

I shall adjust my sentence above: "Correct, the electrons move around
(with a use required by the device's function) within solid
substances."


Actually the coldest place in the known universe is here on Earth.


Is this an attempt at a joke Simon?

If it is a joke, then I don't get it either because in space it can get
down to minus 270.45 Celsius.


--
Bod
  #57  
Old May 23rd 16, 06:02 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Macaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 833
Default ARGH!!!! Roof racks!

On Mon, 23 May 2016 17:50:24 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/05/2016 15:41, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2016 11:20:16 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Monday, 23 May 2016 10:12:30 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
On 23.05.2016 06:33, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2016 18:36:45 +0100, Alycidon
wrote:

On Sunday, 22 May 2016 15:01:30 UTC+1, Mr Macaw wrote:
Correct, the electrons move around within solid substances.

Unless at the impossible absolute zero, ALL atoms are moving in
everything all the time.

Actually, at absolute zero, atoms still have a zero point quantum
energy.

Correct.
At zero uncertainty of momentum (which it would be if the electron were
not moving) its uncertainty of position would be infinite. A practical
impossibility.


And who says it's impossible to get to absolute zero? It's just not
possible by any means we know of (eg simple cooling by contact with a
colder substance).

You would have to violate or break Plank's law and the Heisenberg
uncertainty Principle to get right to absolute zero.

I shall adjust my sentence above: "Correct, the electrons move around
(with a use required by the device's function) within solid
substances."

Actually the coldest place in the known universe is here on Earth.


Is this an attempt at a joke Simon?

If it is a joke, then I don't get it either because in space it can get
down to minus 270.45 Celsius.


I thought it was very evenly 3K everywhere in space other than on planets or stars etc.

ROFL at RANDOM sig below!

--
Only 55% of Americans know that the sun is a star.
  #58  
Old May 23rd 16, 06:27 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Alycidon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,921
Default ARGH!!!! Roof racks!

On Monday, 23 May 2016 17:50:23 UTC+1, Bod wrote:

Actually the coldest place in the known universe is here on Earth.


Is this an attempt at a joke Simon?

If it is a joke, then I don't get it either because in space it can get
down to minus 270.45 Celsius.


Yes, but here on Earth we can get down to 0.0000000001K in labs. 3K colder than deep space.

  #59  
Old May 23rd 16, 06:53 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Macaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 833
Default ARGH!!!! Roof racks!

On Mon, 23 May 2016 18:27:06 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Monday, 23 May 2016 17:50:23 UTC+1, Bod wrote:

Actually the coldest place in the known universe is here on Earth.

Is this an attempt at a joke Simon?

If it is a joke, then I don't get it either because in space it can get
down to minus 270.45 Celsius.


Yes, but here on Earth we can get down to 0.0000000001K in labs. 3K colder than deep space.


You deliberately left out "in a lab" in your original statement. You'd make a terrible lawyer.

--
Abdicate (v.), to give up all hope of ever having a flat stomach.
  #60  
Old May 23rd 16, 07:07 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Bod[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default ARGH!!!! Roof racks!

On 23/05/2016 18:27, Alycidon wrote:
On Monday, 23 May 2016 17:50:23 UTC+1, Bod wrote:

Actually the coldest place in the known universe is here on Earth.

Is this an attempt at a joke Simon?

If it is a joke, then I don't get it either because in space it can get
down to minus 270.45 Celsius.


Yes, but here on Earth we can get down to 0.0000000001K in labs. 3K colder than deep space.

Ah! in Labs, maybe.

--
Bod
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roof Mounted Racks ? Bob[_19_] General 3 September 7th 15 09:33 PM
Roof-racks for bikes D.M. Procida UK 24 September 3rd 07 07:52 AM
bike roof racks DJ Australia 6 January 22nd 05 05:17 AM
Roof Racks? Edward Holt Mountain Biking 3 December 5th 04 06:53 AM
Roof racks adownhiller Mountain Biking 11 November 9th 03 07:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.