In defense of Mr. Vandeman

[...massive crossposting trimmed...]

cc wrote:

A real scientist never leaves out the possibility of being disproven;
the above statement is exactly the opposite, declaring what we've known
all along: you are no scientist or researcher. This type of thinking is
what leads to the omission of all data disagreeing with a preconceived
hypothesis, which is exactly what you are carrying out relative to
mountain biking. Wake up !!

Real scientists generally don't waste their time arguing with whack-job
crackpots. What's your excuse?

CC (the other one)

Corvus Corvax wrote:
[...massive crossposting trimmed...]

cc wrote:

A real scientist never leaves out the possibility of being disproven;
the above statement is exactly the opposite, declaring what we've known
all along: you are no scientist or researcher. This type of thinking is
what leads to the omission of all data disagreeing with a preconceived
hypothesis, which is exactly what you are carrying out relative to
mountain biking. Wake up !!


Real scientists generally don't waste their time arguing with whack-job
crackpots. What's your excuse?

CC (the other one)


Good question . . amb is a
good distraction when I should
be writing or when I'm waiting
for an experiment to finish .
.. or to begin. You know, aided
procrastination. MV is
something to do whilst waiting
for MB content.

I guess it's also kind of like
one of those toys kids have:
the inflatable, bowling-pin
shaped balloons with weight in
the bottom. Every time you hit
them, they come back up. But
you keep hitting them anyway,
right?