#31
|
|||
|
|||
An apology
On Nov 14, 5:50*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote: On 14/11/2011 04:43, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 14, 1:09 am, Derek *wrote: Could I please apologise to the cyclist I cut up with my car at a roundabout near the Watford Industrial Estate the other evening. However if he had had any lights on his bike, I would have seen him a lot sooner and could have given way to him! Like this driver you mean? http://www.swldxer.co.uk/numpty.wmv Typical numbnuts diversionary tactic. Do you have any comment to make about the illegal bicyclist? -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University I am surprised that none of the pyscholists on this forum have defended the unlit cyclist at night, despite being a hazard both to himself and other road users! |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
An apology
On 14/11/2011 19:30, Derek C wrote:
On Nov 14, 5:50 pm, Dave - Cyclists wrote: On 14/11/2011 04:43, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 14, 1:09 am, Derek wrote: Could I please apologise to the cyclist I cut up with my car at a roundabout near the Watford Industrial Estate the other evening. However if he had had any lights on his bike, I would have seen him a lot sooner and could have given way to him! Like this driver you mean? http://www.swldxer.co.uk/numpty.wmv Typical numbnuts diversionary tactic. Do you have any comment to make about the illegal bicyclist? -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University I am surprised that none of the pyscholists on this forum have defended the unlit cyclist at night, despite being a hazard both to himself and other road users! Why? |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
An apology
On Nov 14, 7:38*pm, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2011 19:30, Derek C wrote: On Nov 14, 5:50 pm, Dave - Cyclists wrote: On 14/11/2011 04:43, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 14, 1:09 am, Derek * *wrote: Could I please apologise to the cyclist I cut up with my car at a roundabout near the Watford Industrial Estate the other evening. However if he had had any lights on his bike, I would have seen him a lot sooner and could have given way to him! Like this driver you mean? http://www.swldxer.co.uk/numpty.wmv Typical numbnuts diversionary tactic. Do you have any comment to make about the illegal bicyclist? -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University I am surprised that none of the pyscholists on this forum have defended the unlit cyclist at night, despite being a hazard both to himself and other road users! Why? Because I don't want to be involved in someone elses death wish. Or do you actually think that he was being stupid and that his lack of lights on a dark wet night was indefensible? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
An apology
On 14/11/2011 19:38, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2011 19:30, Derek C wrote: On Nov 14, 5:50 pm, Dave - Cyclists wrote: On 14/11/2011 04:43, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 14, 1:09 am, Derek wrote: Could I please apologise to the cyclist I cut up with my car at a roundabout near the Watford Industrial Estate the other evening. However if he had had any lights on his bike, I would have seen him a lot sooner and could have given way to him! Like this driver you mean? http://www.swldxer.co.uk/numpty.wmv Typical numbnuts diversionary tactic. Do you have any comment to make about the illegal bicyclist? -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University I am surprised that none of the pyscholists on this forum have defended the unlit cyclist at night, despite being a hazard both to himself and other road users! Why? Unlit cyclists at night deserve to be wiped out. Who would ever defend them? They are idiots. -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
An apology
On 14/11/2011 19:45, Derek C wrote:
On Nov 14, 7:38 pm, wrote: On 14/11/2011 19:30, Derek C wrote: On Nov 14, 5:50 pm, Dave - Cyclists wrote: On 14/11/2011 04:43, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 14, 1:09 am, Derek wrote: Could I please apologise to the cyclist I cut up with my car at a roundabout near the Watford Industrial Estate the other evening. However if he had had any lights on his bike, I would have seen him a lot sooner and could have given way to him! Like this driver you mean? http://www.swldxer.co.uk/numpty.wmv Typical numbnuts diversionary tactic. Do you have any comment to make about the illegal bicyclist? -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University I am surprised that none of the pyscholists on this forum have defended the unlit cyclist at night, despite being a hazard both to himself and other road users! Why? Because I don't want to be involved in someone elses death wish. Or do you actually think that he was being stupid and that his lack of lights on a dark wet night was indefensible? Whoever you are, you are being an idiot. You are about as good at trolling as Dave and Judith/JMS and they are both complete failures. Only idiots ride without lights. -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
An apology
On 14/11/2011 19:45, Derek C wrote:
On Nov 14, 7:38 pm, wrote: On 14/11/2011 19:30, Derek C wrote: On Nov 14, 5:50 pm, Dave - Cyclists wrote: On 14/11/2011 04:43, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 14, 1:09 am, Derek wrote: Could I please apologise to the cyclist I cut up with my car at a roundabout near the Watford Industrial Estate the other evening. However if he had had any lights on his bike, I would have seen him a lot sooner and could have given way to him! Like this driver you mean? http://www.swldxer.co.uk/numpty.wmv Typical numbnuts diversionary tactic. Do you have any comment to make about the illegal bicyclist? -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University I am surprised that none of the pyscholists on this forum have defended the unlit cyclist at night, despite being a hazard both to himself and other road users! Why? Because I don't want to be involved in someone elses death wish. Or do you actually think that he was being stupid and that his lack of lights on a dark wet night was indefensible? No... Why are you surprised? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
An apology
On 14/11/2011 20:16, Simon Weaseltemper wrote:
On 14/11/2011 19:45, Derek C wrote: On Nov 14, 7:38 pm, wrote: On 14/11/2011 19:30, Derek C wrote: On Nov 14, 5:50 pm, Dave - Cyclists wrote: On 14/11/2011 04:43, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 14, 1:09 am, Derek wrote: Could I please apologise to the cyclist I cut up with my car at a roundabout near the Watford Industrial Estate the other evening. However if he had had any lights on his bike, I would have seen him a lot sooner and could have given way to him! Like this driver you mean? http://www.swldxer.co.uk/numpty.wmv Typical numbnuts diversionary tactic. Do you have any comment to make about the illegal bicyclist? -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University I am surprised that none of the pyscholists on this forum have defended the unlit cyclist at night, despite being a hazard both to himself and other road users! Why? Because I don't want to be involved in someone elses death wish. Or do you actually think that he was being stupid and that his lack of lights on a dark wet night was indefensible? Whoever you are, you are being an idiot. You are about as good at trolling as Dave and Judith/JMS and they are both complete failures. Only idiots ride without lights. There are a fair few of them about, you have to admit. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
An apology
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:50:04 -0000, "Simon Mason"
wrote: On Nov 14, 4:53 pm, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote: On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:56:42 -0000, Judith wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:43:17 -0800 (PST), Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 14, 1:09 am, Derek C wrote: Could I please apologise to the cyclist I cut up with my car at a roundabout near the Watford Industrial Estate the other evening. However if he had had any lights on his bike, I would have seen him a lot sooner and could have given way to him! Like this driver you mean? http://www.swldxer.co.uk/numpty.wmv Yawn - that's the umpteenth time you have shown us that. Broken your glasses have you? He likes to exaggerate how many times he has problems. So far I've only seen two examples. The first one didn't look like a problem to me (there was plenty of room), and the second one there is no proof that Simon indicated right. My sunglasses do not film events sideways on like my outstretched right hand. **** me - his outstretched right hand films events now. You couldn't make it up. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
An apology
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:21:08 +0000, Judith wrote:
**** me - No thanks. Try the vorephilic dave. -- An oft-repeated lie is still a lie. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
An apology
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:30:30 -0800, Derek C wrote:
I am surprised that none of the pyscholists on this forum have defended the unlit cyclist at night, despite being a hazard both to himself and other road users! I am not. Being invisible is just damn' stupid. -- An oft-repeated lie is still a lie. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An Apology | Noddy Anderson[_2_] | UK | 11 | July 8th 10 12:28 AM |
An Apology! | TrailRat | UK | 12 | April 28th 10 01:26 AM |
Apology | nuxx bar | UK | 12 | October 17th 08 12:09 PM |
An Apology | Andrew Morris | Australia | 66 | July 12th 04 12:04 AM |
An Apology | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 4 | May 20th 04 02:32 AM |