GILBERT - SCHLECK - SCHLECK

He made it look so easy - dope?

On Apr 24, 8:29*am, Anton Berlin wrote:
He made it look so easy *- *dope?

That Bolt guy, he makes it look easy too, wonder if he's doping?

Fred

2005

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/spo...icle539978.ece

Anton Berlin wrote:
He made it look so easy - dope?

Gruber II

On Apr 24, 8:29*am, Anton Berlin wrote:
He made it look so easy *- *dope?

It only looked easy 'cause he was being double-teamed by the two most
incompetent non-sprinters in all of pro cycling. The Schleck brothers
have a lot of talent, but they have no killer instinct.

Fred

On Apr 24, 2:08*pm, Fred wrote:
On Apr 24, 8:29*am, Anton Berlin wrote:

He made it look so easy *- *dope?

It only looked easy 'cause he was being double-teamed by the two most
incompetent non-sprinters in all of pro cycling. *The Schleck brothers
have a lot of talent, but they have no killer instinct.

Fred

Agreed - (see other post )

But it's really ****ing hard to win a bike race - and now we have a
guy that takes the triple ? Last time we saw that was Davide Rebellin
- famous user of EPO and CERA and dq'd out of Beijing silver

On Apr 24, 1:19*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:
On Apr 24, 2:08*pm, Fred wrote:

On Apr 24, 8:29*am, Anton Berlin wrote:

He made it look so easy *- *dope?

It only looked easy 'cause he was being double-teamed by the two most
incompetent non-sprinters in all of pro cycling. *The Schleck brothers
have a lot of talent, but they have no killer instinct.

Fred

Agreed - (see other post )

But it's really ****ing hard to win a bike race - and now we have a
guy that takes the triple ? *Last time we saw that was Davide Rebellin
- famous user of EPO and CERA and dq'd out of Beijing silver

Doesn't matter that Rebellin was doping, everyone else was, too,
remember??

Now that there's no more doping in pro cycling, it's still a level
playing field. (snicker)

Fred

On Apr 24, 12:19*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:
On Apr 24, 2:08*pm, Fred wrote:

On Apr 24, 8:29*am, Anton Berlin wrote:

He made it look so easy *- *dope?

It only looked easy 'cause he was being double-teamed by the two most
incompetent non-sprinters in all of pro cycling. *The Schleck brothers
have a lot of talent, but they have no killer instinct.

Fred

Agreed - (see other post )

But it's really ****ing hard to win a bike race - and now we have a
guy that takes the triple ? *Last time we saw that was Davide Rebellin
- famous user of EPO and CERA and dq'd out of Beijing silver

If only Vino's wheel hadn't exploded. Then he might have
won LBL, and since he'd prevent Gilbert from winning the triple,
we could have confidence that the winners are all clean.

Now that Novitsky has scared everyone straight, I expect
that this year we'll see some real suffering in the mountains.

Sincerely,
Fredmaster Ben

"Fred" wrote in message
...
On Apr 24, 8:29 am, Anton Berlin wrote:
He made it look so easy - dope?
====
It only looked easy 'cause he was being double-teamed by the two most
incompetent non-sprinters in all of pro cycling. The Schleck brothers
have a lot of talent, but they have no killer instinct.

Fred
====

"Killer instinct" may be a requirement for the Classics, but a GC
contender is going to benefit greatly from "talent." But talent still
has to be managed, and who is managing the Schlecks? If they'd been
properly managed, wouldn't they have put a high priority on time trial
performance? Recent results don't show that to be the case.

Day after day after day, Andy has shown he can be there, he can avoid
the big mistakes. But he's not going to do anything spectacular, and
he's not going to win any TTs, so he remains vulnerable to guys like
Alberto Contador and... well OK, not coming up with much of a list after
that!

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

Anton Berlin wrote:
He made it look so easy - dope?

Fred wrote:
It only looked easy 'cause he was being double-teamed by the two most
incompetent non-sprinters in all of pro cycling. The Schleck brothers
have a lot of talent, but they have no killer instinct.

The Schleck's are optimized for long climbs while Gilbert is optimized
for short anaerobic climbs so the Schleck's needed Gilbert to not be
paying attention à la Boonen in last years PR to win, and it didn't
help to have Voigt tell all and sundry they would be attacking on
Faucons. Gilbert attacked them on Saint-Nicholas which was the only
place they could have attacked and they were never going to drop a
classics rider like him on the flat before the finish. The only other
thing they could have tried was to do serial attacks in the last km
before Ans but its doubtful it would have made much difference. They
probably needed fast twitch fibres more than killer instinct.