Cyclist at war!

"ComandanteBanana" wrote in message
...
So what do you think of the VB project, and would you buy one?

I dunno - what do YOU think of the Buell 1125R?

(Hint: this has long ago ceased to be of interest to rec.motorcycles.)


Bob M.

"ComandanteBanana" wrote in message
...
On Oct 20, 9:03 pm, Tom Sherman
wrote:

I've said BIKE LANES, TAME TRAFFIC, OR GO TO HOLLAND, but you are just
picking up on the first one.

Bicycle lanes are separate and unequal facilities.

Why unequal, dummy? Just separate but equal.

This IS true discrimination...

"There's no doubt that car drivers need to clean up their act. Taking
speed limits down to 20mph in built-up areas will make the roads safer
for motorists, cyclists and pedestrians alike. Enforcing the ban on
mobile phone use will help drivers become more attentive. And applying
the Highway Code more strictly will make many people think twice about
engaging in the current bully-boy hierarchy of bigger is better.
...

Now, saying that motor vehicles should have the same rights as
pedestrians or cyclists is like saying that water skiers should be
allowed on all waters in front of a popular beach. The Highway Code by
instigating this non-sensical equality status, that inevitably leads
to the law of the jungle, is bunk. It has the same moral standing as
the South African Pbutt Law."

Sure, go ahead and build your own roads. Use the huge surplus from the
otherwise untapped bicycle road use taxes. The Feds can't fund it, because
bicycles have no interstate commerce value. State, county, and
municipalities can incorporate them as recreational land under eminent
domain. They might even be able to sell bonds to fund construction. Be sure
to write back and let us know that goes. You need to go elsewhere to find
your socialist utopia. Try Canada.

On Oct 21, 12:12*pm, ComandanteBanana
wrote:
SNIP
You are such a well behaved sheep that will blend in the wolf in
sheep's clothing.

What about the wolves who don't wear sheeps clothing, run with the
sheep and wolves and manipulate both to their will??? No clue (why am
I not surprised) Those wolves are called alpha wolves and there are
even Wolves over them...it's good to be THE wolf and not just another
alpha wolf. It's the same whether a push bike or a motorcycle, all do
my will. Even when they don't know they are being manipulated.
--
Keith

S'mee wrote:
On Oct 21, 12:12 pm, ComandanteBanana
wrote:
SNIP
You are such a well behaved sheep that will blend in the wolf in
sheep's clothing.

What about the wolves who don't wear sheeps clothing, run with the
sheep and wolves and manipulate both to their will??? No clue (why am
I not surprised) Those wolves are called alpha wolves and there are
even Wolves over them...it's good to be THE wolf and not just another
alpha wolf. It's the same whether a push bike or a motorcycle, all do
my will. Even when they don't know they are being manipulated.
--
Keith



A wolf in sheeps clothing will be treated as a sheep!.....minus the oral.

On Oct 21, 1:59*pm, BrianNZ wrote:
S'mee wrote:
On Oct 21, 12:12 pm, ComandanteBanana
wrote:
SNIP
You are such a well behaved sheep that will blend in the wolf in
sheep's clothing.

What about the wolves who don't wear sheeps clothing, run with the
sheep and wolves and manipulate both to their will??? No clue (why am
I not surprised) Those wolves are called alpha wolves and there are
even Wolves over them...it's good to be THE wolf and not just another
alpha wolf. It's the same whether a push bike or a motorcycle, all do
my will. Even when they don't know they are being manipulated.
--
Keith

A wolf in sheeps clothing will be treated as a sheep!.....minus the oral.

Well isn't that a given? I thought everyone, even those without wolves
understood that. Bugger them if they get in the way.
--
Keith

(Whatever political differences MAY be between bikers and bicyclists,
is explained here)

Originally Posted by gcottay

'In the United States. "Biker Joe" would not be a cyclist but rather a
motorcycle rider.'

***

That Joe may be for McCain, but Joe the Cyclist must be for Obama.
Statistically speaking at least.

How many sensible bicycle riders could be voting for McCain when all
he promises is "more drilling"? Obama too but he got the drill from
McCain.

S'mee wrote:
On Oct 21, 1:59 pm, BrianNZ wrote:
S'mee wrote:
On Oct 21, 12:12 pm, ComandanteBanana
wrote:
SNIP
You are such a well behaved sheep that will blend in the wolf in
sheep's clothing.
What about the wolves who don't wear sheeps clothing, run with the
sheep and wolves and manipulate both to their will??? No clue (why am
I not surprised) Those wolves are called alpha wolves and there are
even Wolves over them...it's good to be THE wolf and not just another
alpha wolf. It's the same whether a push bike or a motorcycle, all do
my will. Even when they don't know they are being manipulated.
--
Keith
A wolf in sheeps clothing will be treated as a sheep!.....minus the oral.

Well isn't that a given? I thought everyone, even those without wolves
understood that. Bugger them if they get in the way.
--
Keith


....and tie them up if they try to get out of the way?

On Oct 21, 3:40 pm, "MikeWhy" wrote:

Now, saying that motor vehicles should have the same rights as
pedestrians or cyclists is like saying that water skiers should be
allowed on all waters in front of a popular beach. The Highway Code by
instigating this non-sensical equality status, that inevitably leads
to the law of the jungle, is bunk. It has the same moral standing as
the South African Pbutt Law."

Sure, go ahead and build your own roads. Use the huge surplus from the
otherwise untapped bicycle road use taxes. The Feds can't fund it, because
bicycles have no interstate commerce value. State, county, and
municipalities can incorporate them as recreational land under eminent
domain. They might even be able to sell bonds to fund construction. Be sure
to write back and let us know that goes. You need to go elsewhere to find
your socialist utopia. Try Canada.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bicycles may not be necessary in a system built around waste, but that
doesn't make the bicycle something to be dismissed. Maybe the system
is...

"In a society dominated by the fact of commercial competition, money
is necessarily the test of prowess, and wastefulness the sole
criterion of power." -Upton Sinclair, book 'The Jungle'

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:08:40 -0700 (PDT), KingOfTheApes
wrote:

(Whatever political differences MAY be between bikers and bicyclists,
is explained here)

Originally Posted by gcottay

'In the United States. "Biker Joe" would not be a cyclist but rather a
motorcycle rider.'

***

That Joe may be for McCain, but Joe the Cyclist must be for Obama.
Statistically speaking at least.

How many sensible bicycle riders could be voting for McCain when all
he promises is "more drilling"? Obama too but he got the drill from
McCain.

Toll-o-meter gives you a '1' on that one.


--
Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
www.theanimalrescuesite.com/

Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/
Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm

On Oct 21, 3:49*pm, "S'mee" wrote:
On Oct 21, 12:12*pm, ComandanteBanana
wrote:
SNIP

You are such a well behaved sheep that will blend in the wolf in
sheep's clothing.

What about the wolves who don't wear sheeps clothing, run with the
sheep and wolves and manipulate both to their will??? No clue (why am
I not surprised) Those wolves are called alpha wolves and there are
even Wolves over them...it's good to be THE wolf and not just another
alpha wolf. It's the same whether a push bike or a motorcycle, all do
my will. Even when they don't know they are being manipulated.
--
Keith

Some wolves operate without camouflage...

http://home.triad.rr.com/llambeth/Hitler%20vs%20UBI.jpg

And some wear the sheep's clothing...

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2005/...b__430x410.jpg