"Mountain biker dies from fall off cliff": Evolution in Action!

On Wed, 25 May 2005 17:30:59 GMT, "Is this trip REALLY necessary?"
wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote in
:
..
..Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical interpretations.
..It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how it should
..be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done nothing but
..insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop the act.
..
..Done. Later.
..
..Ikonicus
..1-202-518-1515
..415-203-1513

Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously. MAYBE.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 May 2005 17:30:59 GMT, "Is this trip REALLY necessary?"
wrote:

.Mike Vandeman wrote in
:
.
.Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
interpretations.
.It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how it
should
.be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done nothing
but
.insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop the
act.
.
.Done. Later.
.
.Ikonicus
.1-202-518-1515
.415-203-1513

Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously. MAYBE.

As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a history of
violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal details.

On Fri, 27 May 2005 16:14:25 GMT, "Mark" wrote:

..
.."Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
. ..
.. On Wed, 25 May 2005 17:30:59 GMT, "Is this trip REALLY necessary?"
.. wrote:
..
.. .Mike Vandeman wrote in
.. :
.. .
.. .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
..interpretations.
.. .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how it
..should
.. .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done nothing
..but
.. .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop the
..act.
.. .
.. .Done. Later.
.. .
.. .Ikonicus
.. .1-202-518-1515
.. .415-203-1513
..
.. Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously. MAYBE.
..
..As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a history of
..violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
..interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal details.

I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

" .
. .Mike Vandeman wrote in
. :
. .
. .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
.interpretations.
. .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how it
.should
. .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done
nothing
.but
. .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop the
.act.
. .
. .Done. Later.
. .
. .Ikonicus
. .1-202-518-1515
. .415-203-1513
.
. Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously. MAYBE.
.
.As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a history
of
.violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
.interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal
details.

I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.


Paranoid?

I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally , I
think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp detail
you get from headers is telling in itself.

On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:48:13 GMT, "Mark" wrote:

..
.." .
.. . .Mike Vandeman wrote in
.. . :
.. . .
.. . .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
.. .interpretations.
.. . .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how it
.. .should
.. . .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done
..nothing
.. .but
.. . .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop the
.. .act.
.. . .
.. . .Done. Later.
.. . .
.. . .Ikonicus
.. . .1-202-518-1515
.. . .415-203-1513
.. .
.. . Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously. MAYBE.
.. .
.. .As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a history
..of
.. .violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
.. .interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal
..details.
..
.. I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
..
..
..Paranoid?
..
..I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally , I
..think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
..personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
..several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp detail
..you get from headers is telling in itself.

Failure to give one's real name is a sure sign of dishonesty.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:48:13 GMT, "Mark"
wrote:

.
." .
. . .Mike Vandeman wrote in
. . :
. . .
. . .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
. .interpretations.
. . .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how
it
. .should
. . .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done
.nothing
. .but
. . .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop
the
. .act.
. . .
. . .Done. Later.
. . .
. . .Ikonicus
. . .1-202-518-1515
. . .415-203-1513
. .
. . Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously.
MAYBE.
. .
. .As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a
history
.of
. .violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
. .interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal
.details.
.
. I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
.
.
.Paranoid?
.
.I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally , I
.think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
.personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
.several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp detail
.you get from headers is telling in itself.

Failure to give one's real name is a sure sign of dishonesty.

When dealing with a normal, rational person, maybe.

When dealing with a paranoid, obsessed, angry person such as yourself, it's
a sure sign of wisdom.

GG

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:48:13 GMT, "Mark"
wrote:

.
." .
. . .Mike Vandeman wrote in
. . :
. . .
. . .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
. .interpretations.
. . .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how
it
. .should
. . .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done
.nothing
. .but
. . .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop
the
. .act.
. . .
. . .Done. Later.
. . .
. . .Ikonicus
. . .1-202-518-1515
. . .415-203-1513
. .
. . Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously.
MAYBE.
. .
. .As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a
history
.of
. .violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
. .interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal
.details.
.
. I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
.
.
.Paranoid?
.
.I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally , I
.think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
.personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
.several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp detail
.you get from headers is telling in itself.

Failure to give one's real name is a sure sign of dishonesty.

On what grounds do you make this statement?

Please show, with valid data from a peer reviewed , acknowledged expert that
people who dont include their personal details posting to usenet are more
dishonest than those that do.

Or is that another of your 'truths' that cant be proven because they simply
arent true?