NEXT

Xeric isnot a popular word in golf

http://www.willowcreek2hoa.com/view/xeric-project.aspx

but insert LOW WATER and urine...well hypothetically...as low water is in the thinking about pre planning stages that is to say golf is holding out for the next deluge.

http://media.nbcbayarea.com/images/6...51694498_n.jpg

On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 2:39:51 PM UTC-4, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:55:28 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

for a man not liking golf you sure spend a lotta time dwelling on it

I don't like to play golf. I do like to design the hardware.
Actually, I think I'm doing rather well for someone who has played
exactly 1 game (18 holes) and knows little about how the game is
played. Some of my most creative ideas come from total ignorance,
which offers the benefit of not knowing that it won't work, can't be
done, or was invented 100 years ago.

I suppose it would be tactless to remind you who started this golfing
threat.

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558



unbearable...

!? snow melt in NV ?

https://www.google.com/#q=rick+perry...er+declaration

http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/sto/

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:56:07 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:44:56 +0700, John B.
wrote:

But those "radio controlled bullets" simply disintegrate when they
reach the designated distance.... probably not what one wants in a
golf game :-)

Yep. With a real golf ball, the ballistics solution is a three
dimensional problem, where the altitude, azimuth, and range are all
controlled by the golfer.

Obviously you haven't played much golf :-) the proper form of the
above statement would include the phrase "in theory" just before the
"are all" portion :-)

However, with a radio controlled bullet,
only the distance is controlled. Unless the military device can stop
the projectile directly over the golf hole, it's useless for golfing.



Also, disintegrating golf balls have already been invented and are
commonly available:
http://explodinggolfballs.com/index.php?session_id=1433951463278&submit=true&cat egory=Novelty_Golf_Balls
http://www.amazon.com/JP-Lann-Exploding-Golf-Ball/dp/B004DM2UXQ
If golfers spend good money on such rubbish, surely they would be
interested in GPS guided golf balls, golf club accuracy enhancements,
mm wave (radar?) ballistic profilers, and terrain insensitive gyro
stabilized balls.
--
cheers,

John B.

On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:19:22 +0700, John B.
wrote:

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:56:07 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:
Yep. With a real golf ball, the ballistics solution is a three
dimensional problem, where the altitude, azimuth, and range are all
controlled by the golfer.

Obviously you haven't played much golf :-)

True. I've played exactly one 18 hole game which produced a state of
distraction eventually terminating in boredom. Further exposure
seemed unnecessary to verify my opinion. A 2nd game would have been
too much.

the proper form of the
above statement would include the phrase "in theory" just before the
"are all" portion :-)

True. There are other influences on golf ball ballistics:
https://www.google.com/search?q=golfers+prayer&tbm=isch

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 7:38:05 PM UTC-5, John B. wrote:

Boring, perhaps. But it appears that in the 1400's someone observed
that a roughened golf ball went further. In 1672, Newton recognized
that transverse forces existed when spinning tennis balls flew through
the air, Magnus explained these forces in the 1740s and in 1890,
Professor Guthrie Tait of Edinburgh University was the first to
publish an understanding of the aerodynamic principles of a golf ball.
:-)

--
cheers,

John B.
Should have kept that in mind when they developed the Jabulani soccer ball.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/1...le-when-kicked