|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
thoughts from chris carmichael on lance deing dehydrated
An elite cyclist has three main obstacles on the road to success: crashing,
bonking, and getting dehydrated. Lance Armstrong lost over six kilograms of body weight between waking up and finishing Stage 12 yesterday, all of it fluid. That's 8% of his body weight! The fact that he lost some of his power was understandable, and the facts he rode as well as he did yesterday and today are remarkable. Of a cyclist's three main obstacles, crashing is sometimes preferable because if it is a minor fall, once you chase back on you can continue racing at full power. On the hand, once you run out of either fuel (bonking) or fluids (dehydration), there's no way to regain your power until you replenish what you're missing. A 2% loss of body weight due to dehydration leads to a 10-15% drop in sustainable power. If you lose 5-8% of your body weight, you can lose at least 20% of your power. Such extreme fluid loss also puts you at serious risk for heat exhaustion, a condition characterized by a rise in core temperature due to a decreased ability to cool the body through sweating. Dehydration has other, more far-reaching effects on performance as well. In an effort to continue racing at high speed, a dehydrated rider has to dig very deep and expend more energy per unit time than normal. That means that even though Lance was slower than usual during Stage 12, his effort level was higher than normal. Recovering from such an effort, and replenishing his lost fluids, takes time. Lance Armstrong knew today was going to be tough. Your body is more efficient at pulling fluids out of your body than it is replenishing them. It takes more than 24 hours to recover from dehydrating to the extent he did, no matter how much you drink. Following Stage 12, Lance consumed a lot of water and a lot of sports drink in an effort to regain the fluids, electrolytes, and energy he lost earlier in the day. By this morning, his waking body weight (measured after using the bathroom) was nearly normal, but he knew he would feel the lingering effects of the ordeal during Stage 13. While Lance lacked some of his customary punch today, he diligently consumed fluids throughout the stage and managed to contain his rivals. Finishing seven seconds down on Jan Ullrich and passing Alexander Vinokorouv in the final 500 meters of the stage was a great performance, all things considered. Even more encouraging is Lance Armstrong's amazing ability to recover from hard efforts. Part of what makes him a champion is his ability to put in huge efforts on one stage, and then recover to be able to do it again the following day. Lance should be able to fully recover from the past two days and have a strong performance during Stage 14. His goal is still to find opportunities to attack and gain time on Jan Ullrich before Tuesday's rest day. Though his legs may have wavered, Lance's will and character never do, and with a strong team around him, he knows what he has to do to keep his yellow jersey. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
thoughts from chris carmichael on lance deing dehydrated
who is better to comment about what had happened and it's effect than the
athlete's own coach. "David Ryan" wrote in message ... How about a source besides the brain of Chris Carmichael? dwjones wrote: An elite cyclist has three main obstacles on the road to success: crashing, bonking, and getting dehydrated. Lance Armstrong lost over six kilograms of body weight between waking up and finishing Stage 12 yesterday, all of it fluid. That's 8% of his body weight! The fact that he lost some of his power was understandable, and the facts he rode as well as he did yesterday and today are remarkable. Of a cyclist's three main obstacles, crashing is sometimes preferable because if it is a minor fall, once you chase back on you can continue racing at full power. On the hand, once you run out of either fuel (bonking) or fluids (dehydration), there's no way to regain your power until you replenish what you're missing. A 2% loss of body weight due to dehydration leads to a 10-15% drop in sustainable power. If you lose 5-8% of your body weight, you can lose at least 20% of your power. Such extreme fluid loss also puts you at serious risk for heat exhaustion, a condition characterized by a rise in core temperature due to a decreased ability to cool the body through sweating. Dehydration has other, more far-reaching effects on performance as well. In an effort to continue racing at high speed, a dehydrated rider has to dig very deep and expend more energy per unit time than normal. That means that even though Lance was slower than usual during Stage 12, his effort level was higher than normal. Recovering from such an effort, and replenishing his lost fluids, takes time. Lance Armstrong knew today was going to be tough. Your body is more efficient at pulling fluids out of your body than it is replenishing them. It takes more than 24 hours to recover from dehydrating to the extent he did, no matter how much you drink. Following Stage 12, Lance consumed a lot of water and a lot of sports drink in an effort to regain the fluids, electrolytes, and energy he lost earlier in the day. By this morning, his waking body weight (measured after using the bathroom) was nearly normal, but he knew he would feel the lingering effects of the ordeal during Stage 13. While Lance lacked some of his customary punch today, he diligently consumed fluids throughout the stage and managed to contain his rivals. Finishing seven seconds down on Jan Ullrich and passing Alexander Vinokorouv in the final 500 meters of the stage was a great performance, all things considered. Even more encouraging is Lance Armstrong's amazing ability to recover from hard efforts. Part of what makes him a champion is his ability to put in huge efforts on one stage, and then recover to be able to do it again the following day. Lance should be able to fully recover from the past two days and have a strong performance during Stage 14. His goal is still to find opportunities to attack and gain time on Jan Ullrich before Tuesday's rest day. Though his legs may have wavered, Lance's will and character never do, and with a strong team around him, he knows what he has to do to keep his yellow jersey. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
thoughts from chris carmichael on lance deing dehydrated
dwjones wrote:
how did i plagiarize chris carmichael's diary entry? just read the title to the post. it is quite clear that the words in my post was his. FFR, it is customary to provide a URL. "Nick Burns" wrote in message ... "dwjones" wrote in message plagiarized Carmichael diary entry snipped Duh. He means that you should give attribution, not an alternative. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
thoughts from chris carmichael on lance deing dehydrated
David Ryan wrote in message ...
dwjones wrote: how did i plagiarize chris carmichael's diary entry? just read the title to the post. it is quite clear that the words in my post was his. FFR, it is customary to provide a URL. "Nick Burns" wrote in message ... "dwjones" wrote in message plagiarized Carmichael diary entry snipped Duh. He means that you should give attribution, not an alternative. Plagiarism is not the issue. Even with full attribution, it is, strictly speaking, not legal to simply copy and post the entire piece that was written by Carmichael. Doing so goes well beyond "Fair Use". It is perfectly ethical to cite Carmichael's article, to directly quote a few passages, to paraphrase other portions, and to give a link to one of the sources. Your copy and paste job goes beyond bounds, and infringes on copyright. However, "No harm, no foul", I suppose..... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
thoughts from chris carmichael on lance deing dehydrated
In article _bjSa.99668$ye4.71709@sccrnsc01, dwjones
wrote: who is better to comment about what had happened and it's effect than the athlete's own coach. He is not Lance's coach. He is a friend and advisor, and a not very expert advisor at that. Lance's association with Chris is more about friendship and publicity for Chris's company. -WG "David Ryan" wrote in message ... How about a source besides the brain of Chris Carmichael? dwjones wrote: An elite cyclist has three main obstacles on the road to success: crashing, bonking, and getting dehydrated. Lance Armstrong lost over six kilograms of body weight between waking up and finishing Stage 12 yesterday, all of it fluid. That's 8% of his body weight! The fact that he lost some of his power was understandable, and the facts he rode as well as he did yesterday and today are remarkable. Of a cyclist's three main obstacles, crashing is sometimes preferable because if it is a minor fall, once you chase back on you can continue racing at full power. On the hand, once you run out of either fuel (bonking) or fluids (dehydration), there's no way to regain your power until you replenish what you're missing. A 2% loss of body weight due to dehydration leads to a 10-15% drop in sustainable power. If you lose 5-8% of your body weight, you can lose at least 20% of your power. Such extreme fluid loss also puts you at serious risk for heat exhaustion, a condition characterized by a rise in core temperature due to a decreased ability to cool the body through sweating. Dehydration has other, more far-reaching effects on performance as well. In an effort to continue racing at high speed, a dehydrated rider has to dig very deep and expend more energy per unit time than normal. That means that even though Lance was slower than usual during Stage 12, his effort level was higher than normal. Recovering from such an effort, and replenishing his lost fluids, takes time. Lance Armstrong knew today was going to be tough. Your body is more efficient at pulling fluids out of your body than it is replenishing them. It takes more than 24 hours to recover from dehydrating to the extent he did, no matter how much you drink. Following Stage 12, Lance consumed a lot of water and a lot of sports drink in an effort to regain the fluids, electrolytes, and energy he lost earlier in the day. By this morning, his waking body weight (measured after using the bathroom) was nearly normal, but he knew he would feel the lingering effects of the ordeal during Stage 13. While Lance lacked some of his customary punch today, he diligently consumed fluids throughout the stage and managed to contain his rivals. Finishing seven seconds down on Jan Ullrich and passing Alexander Vinokorouv in the final 500 meters of the stage was a great performance, all things considered. Even more encouraging is Lance Armstrong's amazing ability to recover from hard efforts. Part of what makes him a champion is his ability to put in huge efforts on one stage, and then recover to be able to do it again the following day. Lance should be able to fully recover from the past two days and have a strong performance during Stage 14. His goal is still to find opportunities to attack and gain time on Jan Ullrich before Tuesday's rest day. Though his legs may have wavered, Lance's will and character never do, and with a strong team around him, he knows what he has to do to keep his yellow jersey. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
thoughts from chris carmichael on lance deing dehydrated
this is laughable when i get accused of infringing on copyright. this
article written from chris carmichael did not come from a paid site. it was in the public domain that anyone could have access to. so lighten up and take the butt plug out of your ass "Isidor Gunsberg" wrote in message om... David Ryan wrote in message ... dwjones wrote: how did i plagiarize chris carmichael's diary entry? just read the title to the post. it is quite clear that the words in my post was his. FFR, it is customary to provide a URL. "Nick Burns" wrote in message ... "dwjones" wrote in message plagiarized Carmichael diary entry snipped Duh. He means that you should give attribution, not an alternative. Plagiarism is not the issue. Even with full attribution, it is, strictly speaking, not legal to simply copy and post the entire piece that was written by Carmichael. Doing so goes well beyond "Fair Use". It is perfectly ethical to cite Carmichael's article, to directly quote a few passages, to paraphrase other portions, and to give a link to one of the sources. Your copy and paste job goes beyond bounds, and infringes on copyright. However, "No harm, no foul", I suppose..... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
thoughts from chris carmichael on lance deing dehydrated
then why does it say that he is armstrong's coach in his bio?
"warren" wrote in message ... In article _bjSa.99668$ye4.71709@sccrnsc01, dwjones wrote: who is better to comment about what had happened and it's effect than the athlete's own coach. He is not Lance's coach. He is a friend and advisor, and a not very expert advisor at that. Lance's association with Chris is more about friendship and publicity for Chris's company. -WG "David Ryan" wrote in message ... How about a source besides the brain of Chris Carmichael? dwjones wrote: An elite cyclist has three main obstacles on the road to success: crashing, bonking, and getting dehydrated. Lance Armstrong lost over six kilograms of body weight between waking up and finishing Stage 12 yesterday, all of it fluid. That's 8% of his body weight! The fact that he lost some of his power was understandable, and the facts he rode as well as he did yesterday and today are remarkable. Of a cyclist's three main obstacles, crashing is sometimes preferable because if it is a minor fall, once you chase back on you can continue racing at full power. On the hand, once you run out of either fuel (bonking) or fluids (dehydration), there's no way to regain your power until you replenish what you're missing. A 2% loss of body weight due to dehydration leads to a 10-15% drop in sustainable power. If you lose 5-8% of your body weight, you can lose at least 20% of your power. Such extreme fluid loss also puts you at serious risk for heat exhaustion, a condition characterized by a rise in core temperature due to a decreased ability to cool the body through sweating. Dehydration has other, more far-reaching effects on performance as well. In an effort to continue racing at high speed, a dehydrated rider has to dig very deep and expend more energy per unit time than normal. That means that even though Lance was slower than usual during Stage 12, his effort level was higher than normal. Recovering from such an effort, and replenishing his lost fluids, takes time. Lance Armstrong knew today was going to be tough. Your body is more efficient at pulling fluids out of your body than it is replenishing them. It takes more than 24 hours to recover from dehydrating to the extent he did, no matter how much you drink. Following Stage 12, Lance consumed a lot of water and a lot of sports drink in an effort to regain the fluids, electrolytes, and energy he lost earlier in the day. By this morning, his waking body weight (measured after using the bathroom) was nearly normal, but he knew he would feel the lingering effects of the ordeal during Stage 13. While Lance lacked some of his customary punch today, he diligently consumed fluids throughout the stage and managed to contain his rivals. Finishing seven seconds down on Jan Ullrich and passing Alexander Vinokorouv in the final 500 meters of the stage was a great performance, all things considered. Even more encouraging is Lance Armstrong's amazing ability to recover from hard efforts. Part of what makes him a champion is his ability to put in huge efforts on one stage, and then recover to be able to do it again the following day. Lance should be able to fully recover from the past two days and have a strong performance during Stage 14. His goal is still to find opportunities to attack and gain time on Jan Ullrich before Tuesday's rest day. Though his legs may have wavered, Lance's will and character never do, and with a strong team around him, he knows what he has to do to keep his yellow jersey. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
thoughts from chris carmichael on lance deing dehydrated
"dwjones" wrote in message news:E%mSa.101692$Ph3.11394@sccrnsc04... this is laughable when i get accused of infringing on copyright. You mean like a joke? this article written from chris carmichael did not come from a paid site. it was in the public domain that anyone could have access to. so lighten up and take the butt plug out of your ass "Isidor Gunsberg" wrote in message om... David Ryan wrote in message ... dwjones wrote: how did i plagiarize chris carmichael's diary entry? just read the title to the post. it is quite clear that the words in my post was his. FFR, it is customary to provide a URL. "Nick Burns" wrote in message ... "dwjones" wrote in message plagiarized Carmichael diary entry snipped Duh. He means that you should give attribution, not an alternative. Plagiarism is not the issue. Even with full attribution, it is, strictly speaking, not legal to simply copy and post the entire piece that was written by Carmichael. Doing so goes well beyond "Fair Use". It is perfectly ethical to cite Carmichael's article, to directly quote a few passages, to paraphrase other portions, and to give a link to one of the sources. Your copy and paste job goes beyond bounds, and infringes on copyright. However, "No harm, no foul", I suppose..... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
thoughts from chris carmichael on lance deing dehydrated
Steve D wrote:
So Lance was the only one to dehydrate? And no won else did? We've all read about how he is meticulous in his preparation. How could this have happened? Nobody to bring him any bottles?... Steve He bonked on that climb in 1999. I wonder how many other top cyclists have these occasional ****-ups. -- -- Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall "I'm not proud. We really haven't done everything we could to protect our customers. Our products just aren't engineered for security." --Microsoft VP in charge of Windows OS Development, Brian Valentine. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
thoughts from chris carmichael on lance deing dehydrated
warren wrote:
For yourself, listen very carefully to what CC says about Lance's training. Nearly all of the time he simply reports what Lance is doing. He never/rarely mentions who told him what to do for training. And watch him on the "prerace" shows and how he struggles to provide the details of Lance's preparation. It's not surprising to me that CC always looks so nervous on that show. That fits, but I assigned it to confidentiality. And a lot of discomfort with Kirsten Gum. :-) You could also read the Ferrari interviews on cyclingnews.com and get some hints about his involvement with Lance's training plans and where he gets them. -WG CC is a former rider and coach, not an M.D. -- -- Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall "I'm not proud. We really haven't done everything we could to protect our customers. Our products just aren't engineered for security." --Microsoft VP in charge of Windows OS Development, Brian Valentine. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lance won't win #5 this year | dwjones | Racing | 17 | July 19th 03 05:44 PM |
In defence of the Lance era | Bret Wade | Racing | 5 | July 15th 03 11:11 PM |