#11
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 01.08.2018 14:43, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:57:41 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 31.07.2018 13:02, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:06:34 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 30.07.2018 12:13, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:53:56 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 29.07.2018 12:00, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:04:18 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 28.07.2018 13:41, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 11:40:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 27.07.2018 13:35, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Â*Treehugging ignorant moron. Thanks greatly for that excellent compliment coming from YOU. Especially as it is from YOU! Now please ejaculate in my direction the further excellent accolade of being a weed, a fungus, and the dregs of this earth. It really is a very great compliment to be called a treehugging ignorant moron by YOU. Especially by YOU. And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes. After all I ride a bicycle. And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that,Â* that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. Why do people insult others? An insult can be interpreted as an attempt to reduce the social status of the recipient and raise the relative status of the insulter. Â*No, it's because you're wrong. Once again, Thanks greatly for that excellent compliment of Treehugging ignorant moron. The fact that you call me a Treehugging ignorant moron. has nothing to do with whether I am right or wrong. You only honour me with that excellent epithet because you fear that you may be losing some argument , so you introduce an irrelevancy in order to make you think that you are omehow better than me. So I still take it as a great compliment. Â*No, I say it because all green people are incorrect. They might be, but that is independent of them being Treehugging ignorant morons So now please throw me the further excellent epithet of being a stench, a revulsion, and a big suck on a sour lemon. Â*If they are green they are by definition treehuggers. Sez you. Blah! Â*No not me, it's the meaning of the word. What word? "Treehugger", do keep up at the back. Someone who hugs trees? I have never known or seen one. And thanks greatly for your excellent complement of my not keeping up. Now please throw out to me the further honour of being a nincompoop. If they are wrong they are by definition ignorant morons. Ignorant moron has nothing to do with being wrong. Â*If you're ignorant of something, you'll be wrong about it.Â* If you're ignorant of the earth being round, you'll think it's flat. Bullenscheiße. If I am ignorant of something I simply do not know something. By definition that omething could be anything, right or wrong. If I ask Mr Smith about Quantum mechanics and he says he has no idea, I would not call him ignorant.Â* However if I ask Mr Jones and he gives me the wrong answer, some bull**** propagated by the media, then I would call him ignorant. Makes no difference. Ignorant means does not know. I am really glad I am an ignorant moron according to you. Now please throw me the further excellent honour of having crawled out of a mutant maggot egg rejected by an evil scientist as being below his low standards. Â*Have you got that strange fetish where you enjoy having abuse shouted at you? Why yes! If all you can do to win your arguments is to shout compliments at me I have never complimented you. Oh yes you have! By calling me a tree-hugging ignorant moron. Now please throw out to me the further excellent honour of being a thick-headed trog. it indicates to me that you are afraid you may be wrong, but are not man enough to admit it and thus try to convince yourself that you are somehow a better peron than I am. No, I'm just pointing out you're wrong. Then just say it! Do not wander off into irrelevancies such as tree-hugging ignorant morons. I really take that as a compliment coming from you. Therefore I take such blatherings as compliments and an admission of failure by you, and an attempt (failed) to bully me into your line of thought. Hence my "Hitler" comment very early in this thread. If you think I am wrong, just say it with evidence of why I am wrong. Adding irrelevancies such as "treehugging ignorant moron" adds nothing to the conversation. All it does its show your utter intolerance of anyone who may be different from you. It's clear to everyone with a brain that the green movement is a complete and utter waste of time. Thanks greatly for the further excellent compliment and honour from YOU that I have no brain. Now please ejaculate to me the further excellent compliment of being evil beyond comprehension, and half-living in the slough of despair. NOw I will get on my bike. Oh the clear air! And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that,Â* that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. Â*No, I'm fine with normal cyclists.Â* What I don't like are the ones that dress up like they're in the Tour de France, using flashing headlamps in broad daylight, cycle on a busy road when there's a clear pavement right next to them, and wear pansy helmets because they haven't learned not to fall off yet. That is their right. And it's my right to intimidate them with my larger vehicle.Â* You know those roads where the council are cheapskates and don't steamroll the road afterwards, so you can throw stones in cyclist's faces?Â* :-) It is not your right to threaten anyone with physical harm or to interfere with their right to do whatever they like. Yu do not have a right to order somone to change because his habits or mode of tranport offend you. At least they are on a bike. And take 5 times longer to get to their destination, and can't carry so much stuff. That is your take on it. What if they are enjoying themselves? You have no right to interfere with that by physical threats such as throwing up stones from large vehicles at them. Yes, you do have a right to be offended, as long as you do not act on that with physical threats. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stolen bike.... anyone want to bet on it? | Anton Berlin | Racing | 0 | December 22nd 09 07:30 PM |
Shelly Olds...bike stolen, bike found, gold medal won | caffetrieste | Racing | 20 | October 14th 08 09:39 AM |
Stolen bike | Chris A | UK | 26 | March 27th 07 03:01 PM |
nearly stolen bike | Simon Brooke | UK | 0 | November 18th 05 10:16 PM |
nearly stolen bike | nobody760 | UK | 6 | November 17th 05 08:05 AM |